World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
119052
World Ranking
3516
National Ranking
1933

Roberto M. Lang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto M. Lang sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,135 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Roberto M. Lang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto M. Lang sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto M. Lang is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management, and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments.

Roberto M. Lang's recent papers include:

  • "Utility of a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Guide Novices to Acquire Echocardiograms for Limited Diagnostic Use", 2021, JAMA Cardiology
  • "Recommended Standards for the Performance of Transesophageal Echocardiographic Screening for Structural Heart Intervention: From the American Society of Echocardiography", 2021, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • "Restoring Sinus Rhythm Reverses Cardiac Remodeling and Reduces Valvular Regurgitation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation", 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Tricuspid Valve Academic Research Consortium Definitions for Tricuspid Regurgitation and Trial Endpoints", 2023, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Normal Values of Left Atrial Size and Function and the Impact of Age: Results of the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography Study", 2021, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Karima Addetia (91 collaborations)
  • Victor Mor-Avi (55 collaborations)
  • Federico M. Asch (49 collaborations)
  • Jeremy Slivnick (32 collaborations)
  • Juan Ignacio Cotella (30 collaborations)

The main publication venues where Roberto M. Lang's works appear regularly are:

  • Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography (47 publications)
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (22 publications)
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging (21 publications)
  • Circulation (12 publications)
  • European Heart Journal (7 publications)

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B. Devereux;Frank A. Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

    Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Victor Mor-Avi;Jonathan Afilalo

  • Recommendations for chamber quantification

    Roberto M. Lang;Michelle Bierig;Richard B Devereux;Frank A Flachskampf

  • Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular Regurgitation: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;David Adams;Robert O. Bonow;Maurice Enriquez-Sarano

  • Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese society of echocardiography

    Victor Mor-Avi;Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Marek Belohlavek

  • Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Theodore Abraham;Mark S. Adams;Charles J. Bruce

  • EAE/ASE Recommendations for Image Acquisition and Display Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

    Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Wendy Tsang;David H. Adams

  • Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Size and Function: Side-by-Side Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography With Magnetic Resonance Reference

    Lissa Sugeng;Victor Mor-Avi;Lynn Weinert;Johannes Niel

  • Sex-associated differences in left ventricular function in aortic stenosis of the elderly.

    J D Carroll;E P Carroll;T Feldman;D M Ward

  • American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography.

    Sharon L. Mulvagh;Harry Rakowski;Mani A. Vannan;Sahar S. Abdelmoneim

  • Real-Time 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Left Ventricular Volumes: Multicenter Study for Validation With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Investigation of Sources of Error

    Victor Mor-Avi;Carly Jenkins;Harald P. Kühl;Hans Joachim Nesser

  • Guidelines for the Echocardiographic Assessment of Atrial Septal Defect and Patent Foramen Ovale: From the American Society of Echocardiography and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions

    Frank E. Silvestry;Meryl S. Cohen;Laurie B. Armsby;Nitin J. Burkule

  • Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report.

    Julius M. Gardin;David B. Adams;Pamela S. Douglas;Harvey Feigenbaum

  • Sustained hemodynamic effects of an infusion of nesiritide (human b-type natriuretic peptide) in heart failure: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial

    Roger M. Mills;Thierry H. LeJemtel;Darlene P. Horton;Chang-seng Liang

  • Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac chamber size: results from the NORRE study

    Seisyou Kou;Luis Caballero;Raluca Elena Dulgheru;Damien Voilliot

  • Serial Assessment of the Cardiovascular System in Normal Pregnancy Role of Arterial Compliance and Pulsatile Arterial Load

    Athena Poppas;Sanjeev G. Shroff;Claudia E. Korcarz;Judith U. Hibbard

  • 3D echocardiography: a review of the current status and future directions.

    Judy Hung;Roberto Lang;Frank Flachskampf;Stanton K. Shernan

  • Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data.

    Lawrence D. Jacobs;Ivan S. Salgo;Sascha Goonewardena;Lynn Weinert

  • LA Strain for Categorization of LV Diastolic Dysfunction

    Amita Singh;Karima Addetia;Francesco Maffessanti;Victor Mor-Avi

  • Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

    Victor Mor-Avi;Lissa Sugeng;Lynn Weinert;Peter MacEneaney

Frequent Co-Authors

Luigi P. Badano
Luigi P. Badano University of Milano-Bicocca
Ted Feldman
Ted Feldman Edwards Lifesciences (United States)
Joe G.N. Garcia
Joe G.N. Garcia University of Arizona
James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Patrizio Lancellotti
Patrizio Lancellotti University of Liège
Itzhak Kronzon
Itzhak Kronzon Lenox Hill Hospital
Sanjiv J. Shah
Sanjiv J. Shah Northwestern University
Michael H. Picard
Michael H. Picard Harvard University
Bogdan A. Popescu
Bogdan A. Popescu Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
José Luis Zamorano
José Luis Zamorano Hospital Ramon y Cajal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA isn’t limited to becoming a doctor — there are many related academic and career pathways. For those interested in patient care but seeking quicker entry into the healthcare field, consider the easiest rn program options, which can offer a fast track to a nursing career.

Nursing schools can have tough entrance requirements, but some are more accessible. Researching a nursing school that don't require teas or HESI exams can help reduce barriers for applicants looking to start their journey in nursing.

For those who prefer administrative roles, online healthcare management degree programs offer accelerated learning and leadership opportunities in hospitals and clinics.

Alternatively, if you’re interested in the business side of medicine, medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid can help you start a career in this growing, remote-friendly field.

Each of these pathways provides unique ways to join the healthcare sector and support patient care, administration, or technology with flexible online study options.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto M. Lang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles