World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 91 11477 10789 428 409 573 82979

Maurizio Galderisi publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Maurizio Galderisi between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Maurizio Galderisi published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 13.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2020. 2 of the 576 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2020. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 25 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 44 publications 2018: 37 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 46 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1984 2025

576 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Maurizio Galderisi: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 4
1986 0
1987 1
1988 4
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 2
1993 7
1994 4
1995 8
1996 3
1997 6
1998 5
1999 6
2000 4
2001 14
2002 12
2003 15
2004 15
2005 21
2006 21
2007 25
2008 28
2009 13
2010 21
2011 18
2012 23
2013 30
2014 22
2015 31
2016 31
2017 44
2018 37
2019 29
2020 46
2021 14
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 576
Download as CSV

Maurizio Galderisi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurizio Galderisi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 573 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 573
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Maurizio Galderisi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maurizio Galderisi sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 91
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Maurizio Galderisi is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy and focuses on medical research primarily within cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their work encompasses a wide array of topics in cardiovascular health, cardiac imaging, diagnostics, and treatment modalities.

The main fields of study in which Maurizio Galderisi publishes research include:

  • Medicine

Within these broader fields, the subfields of study include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Surgery

Their research covers specific topics such as:

  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Maurizio Galderisi has authored multiple scientific papers, including recent publications in reputable cardiovascular journals. Notable works include:

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease, published in 2020 in European Heart Journal
  • Strain-Guided Management of Potentially Cardiotoxic Cancer Therapy, published in 2020 in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Role of cardiovascular imaging in cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic therapies: a position statement on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA), the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardio-Oncology Council of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), published in 2020 in European Journal of Heart Failure
  • COVID-19 pandemic and cardiac imaging: EACVI recommendations on precautions, indications, prioritization, and protection for patients and healthcare personnel, published in 2020 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Multimodality imaging in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, published in 2021 in European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Ciro Santoro
  • Roberta Esposito
  • Bogdan A. Popescu
  • Maria Lembo
  • Bernard Cosyns

Publication venues where Maurizio Galderisi frequently contributes comprise:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • European Heart Journal
  • Diagnostics
  • International journal of cardiac imaging
  • Echocardiography

Best Publications

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese society of echocardiography

    Victor Mor-Avi;Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Marek Belohlavek

  • 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines

    Jose Luis Zamorano;Patrizio Lancellotti;Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz;Victor Aboyans

  • 2016 ESC Position Paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines The Task Force for cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

    Jose Luis Zamorano;Patrizio Lancellotti;Daniel Rodriguez Munoz;Victor Aboyans

  • Expert Consensus for Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of Adult Patients during and after Cancer Therapy: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

    Juan Carlos Plana;Maurizio Galderisi;Ana Barac;Michael S. Ewer

  • 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redán

  • Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.

    Luigi P. Badano;Theodore J. Kolias;Denisa Muraru;Theodore P. Abraham

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Antonio Pelliccia;Sanjay Sharma;Sabiha Gati;Maria Bäck

  • 2013 ESH/ESC Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension

    Giuseppe Mancia;Robert Fagard;Krzysztof Narkiewicz;Josep Redon

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    Thomas H. Marwick;Thierry C. Gillebert;Gerard Aurigemma;Julio Chirinos

  • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF A DISTINCT DIABETIC CARDIOMYOPATHY (THE FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY)

    Maurizio Galderisi;Keaven M. Anderson;Peter W.F. Wilson;Daniel Levy

  • Standardization of adult transthoracic echocardiography reporting in agreement with recent chamber quantification, diastolic function, and heart valve disease recommendations: an expert consensus document of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.

    Maurizio Galderisi;Bernard Cosyns;Thor Edvardsen;Nuno Cardim

  • Recommendations for the practice of echocardiography in infective endocarditis

    Gilbert Habib;Luigi Badano;Christophe Tribouilloy;Isidre Vilacosta

  • Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Patrizio Lancellotti;Vuyisile T. Nkomo;Luigi P. Badano;Jutta Bergler

  • Speckle-tracking echocardiography: A new technique for assessing myocardial function

    Sergio Mondillo;Maurizio Galderisi;Donato Mele;Matteo Cameli

  • The use of echocardiography in acute cardiovascular care: Recommendations of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association

    Patrizio Lancellotti;Susanna Price;Thor Edvardsen;Bernard Cosyns

  • International Evidence-Based Recommendations for Focused Cardiac Ultrasound

    Gabriele Via;Arif Hussain;Mike Wells;Robert Reardon

  • Feasibility and reference values of left atrial longitudinal strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle tracking.

    Matteo Cameli;Maria Caputo;Sergio Mondillo;Piercarlo Ballo

  • Recommendations on the use of echocardiography in adult hypertension: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)

    T H Marwick;Marwick T H;T C Gillebert;Gillebert T C

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrizio Lancellotti
Patrizio Lancellotti University of Liège
Thor Edvardsen
Thor Edvardsen Oslo University Hospital
Bogdan A. Popescu
Bogdan A. Popescu Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Gilbert Habib
Gilbert Habib Aix-Marseille University
Bruno Trimarco
Bruno Trimarco University of Naples Federico II
Giovanni de Simone
Giovanni de Simone University of Naples Federico II
Luigi P. Badano
Luigi P. Badano University of Milano-Bicocca
Eugenio Picano
Eugenio Picano National Research Council (CNR)
Bernard Cosyns
Bernard Cosyns Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Eduardo Bossone
Eduardo Bossone University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a career in medicine or healthcare but want flexible or alternative pathways, online degrees offer a valuable route. Diverse options exist beyond the traditional MD, allowing students to specialize in administration, nursing, or nutrition—all fields vital to the health sector.

For those drawn to leadership roles in hospitals and clinics, a degree in healthcare administration can help you master the business and operational side of healthcare. Meanwhile, working nurses seeking to advance their qualifications can explore asn to np programs, which bridge the gap from associate to nurse practitioner with flexible online formats.

If nutrition and wellness appeal to you, consider an online degree nutrition program. These courses provide foundational knowledge in food science, dietary planning, and public health. For ambitious professionals seeking high-level roles, the best online mha programs offer advanced management and leadership skills—opening doors to executive positions.

Online pathways are more accessible than ever and allow for career progression or specialization without pausing your professional or personal life.

Best Scientists Citing Maurizio Galderisi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles