World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
43
Citations
4765
World Ranking
5409
National Ranking
238

Didier Jollivet publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Jollivet sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 107 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Didier Jollivet D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Didier Jollivet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Didier Jollivet is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with particular emphasis on oceanography and ecology.

Their scholarly output includes notable publications on marine biology, specifically centered on deep-sea hydrothermal vent ecosystems and associated species. Recent papers highlight diverse aspects of genetic connectivity, species divergence, and ecosystem assessments:

  • Contrasted phylogeographic patterns of hydrothermal vent gastropods along South West Pacific: Woodlark Basin, a possible contact zone and/or stepping-stone (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • Subtle limits to connectivity revealed by outlier loci within two divergent metapopulations of the deep-sea hydrothermal gastropod Ifremeria nautilei (2022, Molecular Ecology)
  • Inter-Specific Genetic Exchange Despite Strong Divergence in Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Gastropods of the Genus Alviniconcha (2022, Genes)
  • A blueprint for integrating scientific approaches and international communities to assess basin-wide ocean ecosystem status (2023, Communications Earth & Environment)
  • Active hydrothermal vents in the Woodlark Basin may act as dispersing centres for hydrothermal fauna (2022, Communications Earth & Environment)

Their coauthor network includes collaborators with frequent partnerships such as Stéphane Hourdez, Thomas Broquet, Claire Daguin-Thiébaut, Jade Castel, and Jean Mary.

Jollivet's research appears regularly in several publication venues, among which are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • PLoS ONE
  • Molecular Ecology

A significant portion of their academic work intersects with multiple subfields, including molecular biology, global and planetary change, and genetics. The main scientific topics covered in their research are diverse:

  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Best Publications

  • Introgression patterns in the mosaic hybrid zone between Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis

    N. Bierne;Philippe Borsa;Philippe Borsa;C. Daguin;D. Jollivet

  • Increasing genomic information in bivalves through new EST collections in four species: Development of new genetic markers for environmental studies and genome evolution

    Arnaud Tanguy;Nicolas Bierne;Carlos Saavedra;Benjamin Pina

  • Biology and ecology of the “Pompeii worm” (Alvinella pompejana Desbruyères and Laubier), a normal dweller of an extreme deep-sea environment: A synthesis of current knowledge and recent developments

    D. Desbruyères;P. Chevaldonné;P. Chevaldonné;A. M. Alayse;D. Jollivet

  • Comparative phylogeography of two coastal polychaete tubeworms in the Northeast Atlantic supports shared history and vicariant events.

    Marc Taïmour Jolly;Marc Taïmour Jolly;Frédérique Viard;Franck Gentil;Éric Thiébaut

  • Sharp genetic break between Atlantic and English Channel populations of the polychaete Pectinaria koreni, along the North coast of France.

    M T Jolly;D Jollivet;F Gentil;E Thiébaut

  • Heat-shock response and temperature resistance in the deep-sea vent shrimp Rimicaris exoculata.

    Juliette Ravaux;Françoise Gaill;Nadine Le Bris;Pierre-Marie Sarradin

  • Comparative phylogeography among hydrothermal vent species along the East Pacific Rise reveals vicariant processes and population expansion in the South.

    S. Plouviez;T. M. Shank;B. Faure;C. Daguin-Thiebaut

  • Sister-species of eastern Pacific hydrothermal vent worms (Ampharetidae, Alvinellidae, Vestimentifera) provide new mitochondrial COI clock calibration

    Pierre Chevaldonne;Didier Jollivet;Daniel Desbruyeres;Richard A. Lutz

  • Amphi-Atlantic cold-seep Bathymodiolus species complexes across the equatorial belt

    K. Olu-Le Roy;R. von Cosel;S. Hourdez;S.L. Carney

  • Specific and genetic diversity at deep-sea hydrothermal vents: an overview

    Didier Jollivet

  • Evidence for differences in the allozyme thermostability of deep-sea hydrothermal vent polychaetes (Alvinellidae): a possible selection by habitat

    D Jollivet;Daniel Desbruyeres;Christine Ladrat;Lucien Laubier

  • Current hypotheses to explain genetic chaos under the sea.

    Bjarki Eldon;Florentine Riquet;Florentine Riquet;Jon Yearsley;Didier Jollivet;Didier Jollivet

  • Thermal limit for metazoan life in question: in vivo heat tolerance of the Pompeii worm.

    Juliette Ravaux;Gérard Hamel;Magali Zbinden;Aurélie A. Tasiemski

  • Temperature resistance of Hesiolyra bergi, a polychaetous annelid living on deep-sea vent smoker walls

    Bruce Shillito;Didier Jollivet;Pierre-Marie Sarradin;Philippe Rodier

  • Escarpia southwardae sp. nov., a new species of vestimentiferan tubeworm (Annelida, Siboglinidae) from West African cold seeps

    Ann C Andersen;S Hourdez;B Marie;D Jollivet

  • Temperature resistance studies on the deep-sea vent shrimp Mirocaris fortunata.

    Bruce Shillito;Nadine Le Bris;Stéphane Hourdez;Juliette Ravaux

  • High genetic diversity and ephemeral drift effects in a successful introduced mollusc (Crepidula fornicata: Gastropoda)

    L. Dupont;D. Jollivet;F. Viard

  • Reproductive biology, sexual dimorphism, and population structure of the deep sea hydrothermal vent scale-worm, Branchipolynoe seepensis (Polychaeta : Polynoidae)

    D Jollivet;A Empis;Mc Baker;S Hourdez

  • Speciation in the deep sea: multi-locus analysis of divergence and gene flow between two hybridizing species of hydrothermal vent mussels.

    Baptiste Faure;Didier Jollivet;Arnaud Tanguy;François Bonhomme

  • Biophysical and Population Genetic Models Predict the Presence of "Phantom" Stepping Stones Connecting Mid-Atlantic Ridge Vent Ecosystems.

    Corinna Breusing;Arne Biastoch;Annika Drews;Anna Metaxas

  • Videoscopic study of deep-sea hydrothermal vent alvinellid polychaete populations: biomass estimation and behaviour

    P Chevaldonne;Didier Jollivet

  • Thermotolerance and the 'Pompeii worms'

    Pierre Chevaldonné;Charles R. Fisher;James J. Childress;Daniel Desbruyères

Frequent Co-Authors

Stéphane Hourdez
Stéphane Hourdez Sorbonne University
Daniel Desbruyères
Daniel Desbruyères French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea
Frédérique Viard
Frédérique Viard University of Montpellier
Françoise Gaill
Françoise Gaill Ocean & Climate Platform
Nicolas Bierne
Nicolas Bierne University of Montpellier
François Bonhomme
François Bonhomme University of Montpellier
Dominique Davoult
Dominique Davoult Sorbonne University
Pierre-Marie Sarradin
Pierre-Marie Sarradin University of Western Brittany
Richard A. Lutz
Richard A. Lutz Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Olivier Poch
Olivier Poch University of Strasbourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution in the USA often requires students to consider flexible and accredited educational pathways. Many now explore online degrees, which can open doors to research, teaching, environmental consulting, and policy roles.

Those interested in bridging health and environmental science may benefit from specialized healthcare programs, such as direct entry msn programs designed for non-nurses seeking advanced qualifications. For students comparing options, it’s important to evaluate which school is a better fit—see a detailed side-by-side analysis in which school is better snhu vs wgu.

Sustainability advocates from different backgrounds sometimes enroll in bsn to msn programs online as a way to apply scientific knowledge in health-focused fields. It’s equally important to select an accredited and recognized institution—learn more about top non profit university options for studying online.

By exploring these pathways and programs, students can align their educational journey with their long-term career goals in both environmental and interdisciplinary sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Didier Jollivet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles