World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
67
Citations
18114
World Ranking
1957
National Ranking
161

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
67
Citations
17786
World Ranking
8143
National Ranking
632

Paul A. Tyler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 369 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Paul A. Tyler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul A. Tyler is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with specific contributions to Environmental Science. Within these broad areas, their subfields include Oceanography and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics in their work encompass Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies, Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, and Marine and Coastal Plant Biology.

Paul A. Tyler has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Cruise Report: EX-11-04, 2011 Mid-Cayman Rise Expedition (ROV & Mapping)", 2021, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library
  • "How to Save Britain's Parliamentary Democracy", 2024, Political Insight
  • "Reproductive biology of two hydrothermal vent Cocculinidae species (Mollusca: Gastropoda) from the Arctic and Southern Ocean", 2025, Marine Biology

The scientist's frequent coauthors include Maria Baker and Eva Ramírez-Llodra, each having collaborated on three occasions. Additional collaborators include Kelley Elliott, Elizabeth Lobecker, and Christopher R. German.

Paul A. Tyler's work appears in publication venues such as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library, Political Insight, and Marine Biology, each featuring at least one of their publications.

Best Publications

  • Deep-Sea Biology: A Natural History of Organisms at the Deep-Sea Floor

    John D. Gage;Paul A. Tyler

  • Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world's largest ecosystem

    E. Ramirez-Llodra;A. Brandt;R. Danovaro;B. De Mol

  • Man and the last great wilderness: human impact on the deep sea.

    Eva Ramirez-Llodra;Paul A. Tyler;Maria C. Baker;Odd Aksel Bergstad

  • Marine litter distribution and density in European seas, from the shelves to deep basins.

    Christopher K. Pham;Eva Ramirez-Llodra;Eva Ramirez-Llodra;Claudia H. S. Alt;Teresa Amaro

  • An improved molecular phylogeny of the Nematoda with special emphasis on marine taxa.

    Birgit H M Meldal;Nicola J Debenham;Paul De Ley;Irma Tandingan De Ley

  • Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology

    Roberto Danovaro;Roberto Danovaro;Paul V.R. Snelgrove;Paul Tyler

  • Seasonality in the deep sea

    P.A. Tyler

  • The Discovery of New Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Communities in the Southern Ocean and Implications for Biogeography

    Alex D. Rogers;Paul A. Tyler;Douglas P. Connelly;Jonathan T. Copley

  • Ecosystems of the deep oceans

    Paul A. Tyler

  • Reproduction and dispersal at vents and cold seeps

    P.A. Tyler;C.M. Young

  • The biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean benthos

    A. Brandt;C. De Broyer;I.G. De Mesel;K.E. Ellingsen

  • Hydrothermal vent fields and chemosynthetic biota on the world's deepest seafloor spreading centre

    Douglas P. Connelly;Jonathan T.P. Copley;Bramley J. Murton;Kate Stansfield

  • Feeding ecology of deep-sea seastars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea): a fatty-acid biomarker approach

    Kerry L. Howell;David W. Pond;David S. M. Billett;Paul A. Tyler

  • A picture on the wall: innovative mapping reveals cold-water coral refuge in submarine canyon.

    Veerle A. I. Huvenne;Paul A. Tyler;Doug G. Masson;Elizabeth H. Fisher

  • The analysis of data in studies of invertebrate reproduction. I. Introduction and statistical analysis of gonad indices and maturity indices

    A. Grant;P. A. Tyler

  • Depth-related distribution and abundance of seastars (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in the Porcupine Seabight and Porcupine Abyssal Plain, N.E. Atlantic

    Kerry L. Howell;David S.M. Billett;Paul A. Tyler

  • Litter in submarine canyons off the west coast of Portugal

    Gideon Mordecai;Paul A. Tyler;Douglas G. Masson;Veerle A.I. Huvenne

  • Is annual reproduction in deep-sea echinoderms a response to variability in their environment?

    P. A. Tyler;A. Grant;S. L. Pain;J. D. Gage

  • Early Larval Development of the Sydney Rock Oyster Saccostrea glomerata Under Near-Future Predictions of CO2-Driven Ocean Acidification

    Sue-Ann Watson;Paul C. Southgate;Paul A. Tyler;Lloyd S. Peck

  • Adult Antarctic Krill Feeding at Abyssal Depths

    Andrew Clarke;Paul A. Tyler

  • Deep-Sea Biology: Abundance and size structure of the deep-sea benthos

    John D. Gage;Paul A. Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

John D. Gage
John D. Gage Scottish Association For Marine Science
David S.M. Billett
David S.M. Billett National Oceanography Centre
Craig M. Young
Craig M. Young University of Oregon
Alan J. Southward
Alan J. Southward Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Lloyd S. Peck
Lloyd S. Peck British Antarctic Survey
Alex Rogers
Alex Rogers University of Oxford
Eva Ramirez-Llodra
Eva Ramirez-Llodra Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Veerle A.I. Huvenne
Veerle A.I. Huvenne National Oceanography Centre
Katrin Linse
Katrin Linse British Antarctic Survey
Daniel O.B. Jones
Daniel O.B. Jones National Oceanography Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners start with the cheapest online general studies degree programs to gain a broad education before specializing. These affordable options allow flexibility and a solid foundation in interdisciplinary subjects.

Those seeking a more focused path might consider programs in geology or earth sciences. With rising demand, several universities offer top-ranked online geology programs that cover crucial areas such as mineralogy, environmental geology, and natural resource management. These programs often blend theory with hands-on, real-world applications.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is another key field linked to Environmental Sciences. GIS specialists play a vital role in analyzing spatial data and supporting environmental decision-making. The breadth of options includes some of the best gis degree programs available online, offering skills applicable across numerous industries, from conservation to urban planning.

For those looking for an accessible start or a career pivot, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help streamline the path. While “easiest” can vary by preference, some online degrees emphasize flexibility and manageable workloads, aiding students in achieving their goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles