World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Angelika Brandt

Angelika Brandt

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
54
Citations
11017
World Ranking
3135
National Ranking
167

Angelika Brandt publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelika Brandt sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 400 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Angelika Brandt D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angelika Brandt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angelika Brandt is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany. Their research primarily centers on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with notable contributions spanning Oceanography, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Molecular Biology as subfields.

The scientist's work extensively covers themes related to Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Marine and Coastal Plant Biology, Marine and Fisheries Research, Marine and Environmental Studies, Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, and Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies.

Angelika Brandt has published recent papers including:

  • Patterns of eukaryotic diversity from the surface to the deep-ocean sediment, 2022, Science Advances
  • Systematic identification of microplastics in abyssal and hadal sediments of the Kuril Kamchatka trench, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • Eukaryotic Biodiversity and Spatial Patterns in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone and Other Abyssal Regions: Insights From Sediment DNA and RNA Metabarcoding, 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Antarctic ecosystem responses following ice-shelf collapse and iceberg calving: Science review and future research, 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
  • Discovery of widely available abyssal rock patches reveals overlooked habitat type and prompts rethinking deep-sea biodiversity, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Angelika Brandt include Hanieh Saeedi, Henry Knauber, Torben Riehl, Stefanie Kaiser, and Davide Di Franco.

Publication venues where Angelika Brandt has most frequently published are Progress In Oceanography with 14 publications, Frontiers in Marine Science with 8, Marine Biodiversity with 4, Diversity with 3, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 3.

Angelika Brandt has also contributed to book publications, including a work titled Biogeographic Atlas of the Deep NW Pacific Fauna published by Pensoft Publishers in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Deep, diverse and definitely different: unique attributes of the world's largest ecosystem

    E. Ramirez-Llodra;A. Brandt;R. Danovaro;B. De Mol

  • Climate change and Southern Ocean ecosystems I: how changes in physical habitats directly affect marine biota

    Andrew J. Constable;Andrew J. Constable;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Stuart P. Corney;Kevin R. Arrigo

  • First insights into the biodiversity and biogeography of the Southern Ocean deep sea

    Angelika Brandt;Andrew J. Gooday;Simone N. Brandão;Saskia Brix

  • A roadmap for Antarctic and Southern Ocean science for the next two decades and beyond

    M.C. Kennicutt;S.L. Chown;J.J. Cassano;D. Liggett

  • Plastic pollution of the Kuril–Kamchatka Trench area (NW pacific)

    Viola Fischer;Nikolaus O. Elsner;Nils Brenke;Enrico Schwabe

  • The biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean benthos

    A. Brandt;C. De Broyer;I.G. De Mesel;K.E. Ellingsen

  • Higher classification of the flabelliferan and related Isopoda based on a reappraisal of relationships

    Angelika Brandt;Gary C. B. Poore

  • An improved supra- and epibenthic sledge for catching Peracarida (Crustacea, Malacostraca)

    Angelika Brandt;Dagmar Barthel

  • Benthic community patterns reflect water column processes in the Northeast Water polynya (Greenland)

    Dieter Piepenburg;William G. Ambrose;Angelika Brandt;Paul E. Renaud

  • Zur Besiedlungsgeschichte des antarktischen Schelfes am Beispiel der Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca) = Colonization of the Antarctic shelf by the Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca)

    A. Brandt

  • Molecular data reveal a highly diverse species flock within the munnopsoid deep-sea isopod Betamorpha fusiformis (Barnard, 1920) (Crustacea: Isopoda: Asellota) in the Southern Ocean

    Michael J. Raupach;Marina Malyutina;Angelika Brandt;Johann-Wolfgang Wägele

  • Patterns of eukaryotic diversity from the surface to the deep-ocean sediment

    Unknown

  • Introduction to ANDEEP(ANtarctic benthic DEEP -sea biodiversity: colonization history and recent community patterns)—a tribute to Howard L. Sanders

    Angelika Brandt;Claude De Broyer;Andrew J. Gooday;Brigitte Hilbig

  • Commonness and rarity in the marine biosphere

    Sean R. Connolly;M. Aaron MacNeil;M. Julian Caley;Nancy Knowlton

  • Developing priority variables (“ecosystem Essential Ocean Variables” — eEOVs) for observing dynamics and change in Southern Ocean ecosystems

    Andrew J. Constable;Andrew J. Constable;Daniel P. Costa;Oscar Schofield;Louise Newman

  • Deep-sea isopod biodiversity, abundance, and endemism in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean-Results from the ANDEEP I-III expeditions

    Angelika Brandt;Saskia Brix;Wiebke Brökeland;Madhumita Choudhury

  • Zur Besiedlungsgeschichte des antarktischen Schelfes am Beispiel der Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca)

    A. Brandt

  • Global Observational Needs and Resources for Marine Biodiversity

    Gabrielle Canonico;Pier Luigi Buttigieg;Enrique Montes;Frank E. Muller-Karger

  • Brooding and Species Diversity in the Southern Ocean: Selection for Brooders Or Speciation within Brooding Clades?

    John S. Pearse;Richard Mooi;Susanne J. Lockhart;Angelika Brandt

  • Possible effects of global environmental changes on Antarctic benthos: a synthesis across five major taxa.

    Jeroen Ingels;Ann Vanreusel;Angelika Brandt;Ana I. Catarino

  • Origin of Antarctic Isopoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca)

    Angelika Brandt

  • Epifauna of the Sea of Japan collected via a new epibenthic sledge equipped with camera and environmental sensor systems

    A. Brandt;N. Elsner;N. Brenke;O. Golovan

Frequent Co-Authors

Katrin Linse
Katrin Linse British Antarctic Survey
Huw J. Griffiths
Huw J. Griffiths British Antarctic Survey
Julian Gutt
Julian Gutt Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Andrew J. Gooday
Andrew J. Gooday National Oceanography Centre
Ann Vanreusel
Ann Vanreusel Ghent University
David K. A. Barnes
David K. A. Barnes British Antarctic Survey
Andrew Constable
Andrew Constable University of Tasmania
Patricia Miloslavich
Patricia Miloslavich University of Tasmania
Sven Thatje
Sven Thatje National Oceanography Centre
Gary C. B. Poore
Gary C. B. Poore Museums Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Ecology and Evolution share valuable connections with psychology and counseling fields—especially as many careers today demand strong skills in research, analytics, and human behavior. Exploring related pathways can open exciting alternatives or complementary roles in your professional journey.

If you’re interested in law and criminal justice, psychology degrees can be useful for specialized niches. For example, learning about how much do forensic psychologists make might inform your decision to pursue forensic psychology, where understanding both behavior and evidence is key.

Those passionate about supporting youth development should consider child psychology degrees online. These flexible programs help you develop the expertise needed to guide and support children and teens in academic and social environments.

There are also affordable online master degree programs in counseling for those interested in guiding others through life’s mental and emotional challenges. Likewise, exploring clinical psychology online degree options enables you to prepare for roles in healthcare, therapy, and community services.

Best Scientists Citing Angelika Brandt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles