World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
12044
World Ranking
1823
National Ranking
666

Craig M. Young publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig M. Young sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 232 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Craig M. Young D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Craig M. Young sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Craig M. Young is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans several specialized subfields including Ecology, Oceanography, Ocean Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work engages with a range of topics centered on marine environments, with particular focus areas such as Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Isotope Analysis in Ecology, Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and Marine Ecology and Invasive Species.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Craig M. Young include Mary A. Sewell, Shen Jean Lim, Luke Thompson, Terry Gaasterland, and Kelly D. Goodwin. Their publications appear often in notable scientific venues such as Frontiers in Marine Science, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Marine Pollution Bulletin, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, and Communications Earth & Environment.

Selected recent papers by Craig M. Young reflect a focus on marine pollution, methane emissions, microbial ecology, and deep-sea ecosystems:

  • Distributions of microplastics and larger anthropogenic debris in Norfolk Canyon, Baltimore Canyon, and the adjacent continental slope (Western North Atlantic Margin, U.S.A.) (2021) in Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Methane Seeps on the US Atlantic Margin and Their Potential Importance to Populations of the Commercially Valuable Deep-Sea Red Crab, Chaceon quinquedens (2020) in Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Dominance of Sulfurospirillum in Metagenomes Associated with the Methane Ice Worm (Sirsoe methanicola) (2022) in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • Deep seafloor hydrothermal vent communities buried by volcanic ash from the 2022 Hunga eruption (2024) in Communications Earth & Environment
  • Coupling large-spatial scale larval dispersal modelling with barcoding to refine the amphi-Atlantic connectivity hypothesis in deep-sea seep mussels (2023) in Frontiers in Marine Science

Craig M. Young was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Locomotion of marine invertebrate larvae: a review

    Fu-Shiang Chia;John Buckland-Nicks;Craig M. Young

  • The ecology and behavior of ascidian larvae

    I. Svane;C. M. Young

  • Atlas of marine invertebrate larvae

    C M Young;M A Sewell;Academic Press M E Rice (eds)

  • Behavior and Locomotion During the Dispersal Phase of Larval Life

    Craig M. Young

  • Epibiosis of Marine Algae and Benthic Invertebrates: Natural Products Chemistry and Other Mechanisms Inhibiting Settlement and Overgrowth

    Andrew R. Davis;Nancy M. Targett;Oliver J. McConnell;Craig M. Young

  • Larval dispersal potential of the tubeworm Riftia pachyptila at deep-sea hydrothermal vents

    Adam G. Marsh;Adam G. Marsh;Lauren S. Mullineaux;Craig M. Young;Donal T. Manahan

  • Reproduction and dispersal at vents and cold seeps

    P.A. Tyler;C.M. Young

  • Estimating dispersal distance in the deep sea: challenges and applications to marine reserves

    Ana Hilário;Anna Metaxas;Sylvie M. Gaudron;Kerry L. Howell

  • Microhabitat-associated variability in survival and growth of subtidal solitary ascidians during the first 21 days after settlement

    C. M. Young;F. S. Chia

  • Siliceous sponges as a silicon sink: An overlooked aspect of benthopelagic coupling in the marine silicon cycle

    Manuel Maldonado;Ma Carmen Carmona;Zoila Velásquez;Angels Puig

  • Effects of physical factors on larval behavior, settlement and recruitment of four tropical demosponges

    Manuel Maldonado;Craig M. Young

  • Larval ecology of marine invertebrates: A sesquicentennial history

    Craig M. Young

  • Reproductive success in large populations: empirical measures and theoretical predictions of fertilization in the sea biscuit Clypeaster rosaceus

    Don R. Levitan;Craig M. Young

  • Reproduction, larval biology, and recruitment of the deep-sea benthos

    Craig M. Young;Kevin J. Eckelbarger

  • LABORATORY EVIDENCE FOR DELAY OF LARVAL SETTLEMENT IN RESPONSE TO A DOMINANT COMPETITOR

    Craig M. Young;F. S. Chia

  • Deep-sea ecology. Developmental arrest in vent worm embryos.

    Florence Pradillon;Bruce Shillito;Craig M. Young;Françoise Gaill

  • Fixed, free, and fixed: The fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian–Triassic origin

    Greg W. Rouse;Lars S. Jermiin;Lars S. Jermiin;Nerida G. Wilson;Igor Eeckhaut

  • Temperature limits to fertilization and early development in the tropical sea urchin Echinometra lucunter

    Mary A. Sewell;Craig M. Young

  • Embryology of vestimentiferan tube worms from deep-sea methane/sulphide seeps

    Craig M. Young;Elsa Vázquez;Anna Metaxas;Paul A. Tyler

  • Sponge Grounds as Key Marine Habitats: A Synthetic Review of Types, Structure, Functional Roles, and Conservation Concerns

    Manuel Maldonado;Ricardo Aguilar;Raymond J. Bannister;James J. Bell

  • The natural diet of a hexactinellid sponge: Benthic–pelagic coupling in a deep-sea microbial food web

    Adele J. Pile;Craig M. Young

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Tyler
Paul A. Tyler University of Southampton
Manuel Maldonado
Manuel Maldonado Spanish National Research Council
Alan J. Southward
Alan J. Southward Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
Anna Metaxas
Anna Metaxas Dalhousie University
Robert C. Vrijenhoek
Robert C. Vrijenhoek Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Mary A. Sewell
Mary A. Sewell University of Auckland
Greg W. Rouse
Greg W. Rouse University of California, San Diego
Cindy Lee Van Dover
Cindy Lee Van Dover Duke University
Nerida G. Wilson
Nerida G. Wilson University of Western Australia
Lauren S. Mullineaux
Lauren S. Mullineaux Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA, it’s important to consider how online education can support your career goals. Many students choose flexible, accredited programs to advance both academic knowledge and professional opportunities.

Some of the fastest online programs help you progress quickly. For example, if you’re interested in healthcare, a fastest rn to bsn program online can allow registered nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree in as little as six months. If you’re considering a long-term path in healthcare leadership or academia, options like rn to np bridge programs efficiently bridge your skills toward nurse practitioner qualifications.

Even those without a nursing background can pivot into healthcare with options such as an online direct entry msn program, designed for non-nurses seeking advanced clinical education.

Choosing the right school is crucial. Wondering which school is better snhu vs wgu? Research each option’s strengths to find the best fit for your learning style and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Craig M. Young

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles