World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
63
Citations
14050
World Ranking
1777
National Ranking
576

Earth Science

D-Index
60
Citations
12031
World Ranking
1920
National Ranking
838

Tuncer B. Edil publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tuncer B. Edil sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 134 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 117 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 59 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 348 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Tuncer B. Edil D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tuncer B. Edil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 128 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 349 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 425 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 94 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 24 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tuncer B. Edil is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of engineering and environmental science, with a focus on civil and structural engineering and related subfields.

Their work encompasses several subfields including civil and structural engineering, industrial and manufacturing engineering, environmental engineering, pollution, and building and construction. The main topics covered in their publications involve geotechnical engineering and soil stabilization, landfill environmental impact studies, soil and unsaturated flow, grouting, rheology, and soil mechanics, geotechnical engineering and underground structures, groundwater flow and contamination studies, as well as transportation safety and impact analysis.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Craig H. Benson, Idil Deniz Akin, Sabrina L. Bradshaw, Ronald J. Breitmeyer, and Levi S. Potter.

Notable publication venues for their research include:

  • Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Geo-Congress 2020
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
  • Geomechanics and Engineering
  • E3S Web of Conferences

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Effect of Changing Unit Weight and Decomposition on Unsaturated Hydraulics of Municipal Solid Waste in Bioreactor Landfills, 2020, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Quantifying the Benefits of Using Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum in Sustainable Wallboard Production, 2024, UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)
  • Implications of Interparticle Forces on Resilient and Shear Modulus of Unsaturated Compacted Kaolinite, 2021, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
  • Effect of grain size on the shear strength of unsaturated silty soils, 2020, Geomechanics and Engineering
  • Preliminary Numerical Modeling of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall under Flooding and Rapid Drawdown Conditions, 2020, Geo-Congress 2020

Best Publications

  • Evaluating the hydraulic conductivity of GCLs permeated with non-standard liquids

    Charles D Shackelford;Craig H Benson;Takeshi Katsumi;Tuncer B Edil

  • HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND SWELLING OF NONPREHYDRATED GCLS PERMEATED WITH SINGLE-SPECIES SALT SOLUTIONS

    Ho Young Jo;Takeshi Katsumi;Craig H. Benson;Tuncer B. Edil

  • Stabilization of Organic Soils with Fly Ash

    Erdem O. Tastan;Tuncer B. Edil;Craig H. Benson;Ahmet H. Aydilek

  • Design of Highway Embankments Using Tire Chips

    Peter J. Bosscher;Tuncer B. Edil;Senro Kuraoka

  • DEM simulation of granular media—structure interface: effects of surface roughness and particle shape

    Richard P. Jensen;Peter J. Bosscher;Michael E. Plesha;Tuncer B. Edil

  • Stabilizing Soft Fine-Grained Soils with Fly Ash

    Tuncer B. Edil;Hector A. Acosta;Craig H. Benson

  • Long-term hydraulic conductivity of a geosynthetic clay liner permeated with inorganic salt solutions

    Ho Young Jo;Craig H. Benson;Charles D. Shackelford;Jae Myung Lee

  • HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND SWELL OF NONPREHYDRATED GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINERS PERMEATED WITH MULTISPECIES INORGANIC SOLUTIONS

    Dale C. Kolstad;Craig H. Benson;Tuncer B. Edil

  • Long-Term Hydraulic Conductivity of a Bentonite-Polymer Composite Permeated with Aggressive Inorganic Solutions

    Joseph Scalia;Craig H. Benson;Gretchen L. Bohnhoff;Tuncer B. Edil

  • Interaction Between Reinforcing Geosynthetics and Soil-Tire Chip Mixtures

    Nilay Tatlisoz;Tuncer B. Edil;Craig H. Benson

  • Correlating Index Properties and Hydraulic Conductivity of Geosynthetic Clay Liners

    Jae Myung Lee;Charles D. Shackelford;Craig H. Benson;Ho Young Jo

  • Soft subgrades' stabilization by using various fly ashes

    Aykut Senol;Tuncer B. Edil;Md.Sazzad Bin-Shafique;Hector A. Acosta

  • Effects of pH on the leaching mechanisms of elements from fly ash mixed soils

    Kanokwan Komonweeraket;Bora Cetin;Ahmet H. Aydilek;Craig H. Benson

  • CONSTRUCTION AND PERFORMANCE OF A SHREDDED WASTE TIRE TEST EMBANKMENT

    Peter J Bosscher;Tuncer B Edil;Neil N Eldin

  • Geological and Physical Factors Affecting the Friction Angle of Compacted Sands

    Christopher A. Bareither;Tuncer B. Edil;Craig H. Benson;David M. Mickelson

  • Comparison of Solute Transport in Three Composite Liners

    Gary J. Foose;Craig H. Benson;Tuncer B. Edil

  • Modulus-Suction-Moisture Relationship for Compacted Soils in Postcompaction State

    Auckpath Sawangsuriya;Tuncer B Edil;Peter J Bosscher

  • A review of aqueous-phase VOC transport in modern landfill liners

    Tuncer B Edil

  • Field Evaluation of Construction Alternatives for Roadways over Soft Subgrade

    Tuncer B. Edil;Craig H. Benson;M. Bin-Shafique;Burak F. Tanyu

  • INTERACTION OF FOUNDRY SANDS WITH GEOSYNTHETICS

    Marc J. Goodhue;Marc J. Goodhue;Tuncer B. Edil;Tuncer B. Edil;Craig H. Benson;Craig H. Benson

Frequent Co-Authors

Craig H. Benson
Craig H. Benson University of Wisconsin–Madison
William J. Likos
William J. Likos University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ahmet H. Aydilek
Ahmet H. Aydilek University of Maryland, College Park
Patrick J. Fox
Patrick J. Fox Pennsylvania State University
David M. Mickelson
David M. Mickelson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles D. Shackelford
Charles D. Shackelford Colorado State University
Morton A. Barlaz
Morton A. Barlaz North Carolina State University
Fumio Tatsuoka
Fumio Tatsuoka Tokyo University of Science
Kevin H. Gardner
Kevin H. Gardner City University of New York
Timothy D. Stark
Timothy D. Stark University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond traditional engineering and technology degrees, students may want to explore other fields that combine innovation with practical career routes. For those interested in digital communication, degrees in social media offer strong grounding in marketing, branding, and analytics—key skills across nearly every industry today.

Students who prefer people-focused roles can consider hospitality management courses online. These programs teach business, customer service, and operations management, complementing technical backgrounds with highly transferable soft skills.

For those aiming to enter executive or business leadership, pursuing the cheapest aacsb online mba no gmat can be the next step. These accredited degrees develop advanced managerial expertise without the overhead of traditional on-campus study.

Interested in the legal aspects of technology? aba approved paralegal programs online make it possible to specialize in areas like intellectual property or tech regulation—an increasingly important field for engineers and technologists.

Best Scientists Citing Tuncer B. Edil

Trending Scientists