World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10273 9615 1009 963 81 4223

Anna M. Woollams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna M. Woollams between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna M. Woollams published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2015. 5 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2015. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1997 2025

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna M. Woollams: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 2
2006 3
2007 2
2008 3
2009 3
2010 4
2011 3
2012 9
2013 4
2014 3
2015 11
2016 4
2017 6
2018 6
2019 6
2020 1
2021 4
2022 7
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 97
Download as CSV

Anna M. Woollams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Woollams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 81
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna M. Woollams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Woollams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna M. Woollams is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience.

Their work covers several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Key topics explored in Woollams' research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Woollams include Marta Czime Litwińczuk, Nils Muhlert, Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto, Ajay D. Halai, and Matthew A. Lambon Ralph.

The primary venues publishing Woollams' research involve:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • NeuroImage

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Woollams include:

  • "Investigating the effect of changing parameters when building prediction models for post-stroke aphasia," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function," 2022, NeuroImage
  • "Distinct roles for the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus in the spatiotemporal cortical semantic network," 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods," 2022, Brain Connectivity
  • "Using graph theory as a common language to combine neural structure and function in models of healthy cognitive performance," 2023, Human Brain Mapping

Best Publications

  • SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia

    Anna M. Woollams;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;David C. Plaut;Karalyn Patterson

  • Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics

    Ajay D. Halai;Anna M. Woollams;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures

    Rebecca A. Butler;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • Presemantic Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation

    Karalyn Patterson;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Elizabeth Jefferies;Anna Woollams

  • Anomia: a doubly typical signature of semantic dementia.

    Anna M. Woollams;Elisa Cooper-Pye;John R. Hodges;Karalyn Patterson

  • Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Sylvia Vitello;Anna M. Woollams;Patti Adank;Patti Adank

  • [Q: ] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexicality in Written Word Recognition

    O. Hauk;K. Patterson;A. Woollams;L. Watling

  • “Presemantic” Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation

    Unknown

  • Making sense of progressive non-fluent aphasia: an analysis of conversational speech

    Jonathan A. Knibb;Anna M. Woollams;John R. Hodges;Karalyn Patterson

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics

    Michael Spivey;Ken McRae;Marc Joanisse

  • Efficient Visual Object and Word Recognition Relies on High Spatial Frequency Coding in the Left Posterior Fusiform Gyrus: Evidence from a Case-Series of Patients with Ventral Occipito-Temporal Cortex Damage

    Daniel J. Roberts;Anna M. Woollams;Esther Kim;Pelagie M. Beeson

  • Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory

    Anna M. Woollams;Jason R. Taylor;Frini Karayanidis;Richard N. Henson

  • Repeat and Point: Differentiating semantic dementia from progressive non-fluent aphasia

    John R. Hodges;Marina Martinos;Anna M. Woollams;Karalyn Patterson

  • Triangulation of the neurocomputational architecture underpinning reading aloud

    Paul Hoffman;Paul Hoffman;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion

    Max Coltheart;Anna Woollams;Sachiko Kinoshita;Conrad Perry

  • Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions

    Paul Hoffman;Anna M. Woollams

  • What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.

    Gemma A. L. Evans;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • Cognitive consequences of the left-right asymmetry of atrophy in semantic dementia.

    Anna M. Woollams;Karalyn Patterson;Karalyn Patterson

  • Connectionist Neuropsychology: Uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia

    Anna M. Woollams

  • How Word Meaning Influences Word Reading

    J. S. H. Taylor;Fiona J. Duff;Anna M. Woollams;Padraic Monaghan

  • The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning?

    Sachiko Kinoshita;Anna Woollams

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: The Human Conceptual System

    Anna Woollams;Karalyn Patterson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Paul F. Hoffman
Paul F. Hoffman University of Edinburgh
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Olaf Hauk
Olaf Hauk MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Timothy T. Rogers
Timothy T. Rogers University of Wisconsin–Madison
David C. Plaut
David C. Plaut Carnegie Mellon University
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees in the USA offer flexibility and accessibility for students in various regions. Many colleges and universities provide full or part-time programs with different levels of academic rigor, allowing learners to choose pathways that fit their schedules and goals. For students seeking a streamlined approach, the easiest online psychology master's degrees in California can be a great option, offering reputable programs that balance quality and convenience.

Those located in other regions have varied choices as well. The Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online options are popular for students who value strong faculty but want a more accessible admission route. Similarly, the easiest online psychology programs in the Midwest provide diverse opportunities across leading institutions in that part of the country.

Interested in location-specific options? The San Antonio psychology programs online cater to Texas-based students and those seeking programs with a local focus. No matter the choice, graduates can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, and research, or continue to advanced studies in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anna M. Woollams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles