World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4223
World Ranking
10273
National Ranking
1009

Anna M. Woollams publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Woollams sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 81 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna M. Woollams D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna M. Woollams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna M. Woollams is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of neuroscience and medicine, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience.

Their work covers several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, developmental and educational psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

Key topics explored in Woollams' research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Woollams include Marta Czime Litwińczuk, Nils Muhlert, Nelson J. Trujillo-Barreto, Ajay D. Halai, and Matthew A. Lambon Ralph.

The primary venues publishing Woollams' research involve:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • NeuroImage

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Woollams include:

  • "Investigating the effect of changing parameters when building prediction models for post-stroke aphasia," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Combination of structural and functional connectivity explains unique variation in specific domains of cognitive function," 2022, NeuroImage
  • "Distinct roles for the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus in the spatiotemporal cortical semantic network," 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods," 2022, Brain Connectivity
  • "Using graph theory as a common language to combine neural structure and function in models of healthy cognitive performance," 2023, Human Brain Mapping

Best Publications

  • SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia

    Anna M. Woollams;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;David C. Plaut;Karalyn Patterson

  • Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics

    Ajay D. Halai;Anna M. Woollams;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph

  • Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures

    Rebecca A. Butler;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • Presemantic Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation

    Karalyn Patterson;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Elizabeth Jefferies;Anna Woollams

  • Anomia: a doubly typical signature of semantic dementia.

    Anna M. Woollams;Elisa Cooper-Pye;John R. Hodges;Karalyn Patterson

  • Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: an Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis.

    Jennifer M. Rodd;Sylvia Vitello;Anna M. Woollams;Patti Adank;Patti Adank

  • [Q: ] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexicality in Written Word Recognition

    O. Hauk;K. Patterson;A. Woollams;L. Watling

  • “Presemantic” Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation

    Unknown

  • Making sense of progressive non-fluent aphasia: an analysis of conversational speech

    Jonathan A. Knibb;Anna M. Woollams;John R. Hodges;Karalyn Patterson

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics

    Michael Spivey;Ken McRae;Marc Joanisse

  • Efficient Visual Object and Word Recognition Relies on High Spatial Frequency Coding in the Left Posterior Fusiform Gyrus: Evidence from a Case-Series of Patients with Ventral Occipito-Temporal Cortex Damage

    Daniel J. Roberts;Anna M. Woollams;Esther Kim;Pelagie M. Beeson

  • Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory

    Anna M. Woollams;Jason R. Taylor;Frini Karayanidis;Richard N. Henson

  • Repeat and Point: Differentiating semantic dementia from progressive non-fluent aphasia

    John R. Hodges;Marina Martinos;Anna M. Woollams;Karalyn Patterson

  • Triangulation of the neurocomputational architecture underpinning reading aloud

    Paul Hoffman;Paul Hoffman;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • A position-sensitive Stroop effect: further evidence for a left-to-right component in print-to-speech conversion

    Max Coltheart;Anna Woollams;Sachiko Kinoshita;Conrad Perry

  • Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions

    Paul Hoffman;Anna M. Woollams

  • What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.

    Gemma A. L. Evans;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph;Anna M. Woollams

  • Cognitive consequences of the left-right asymmetry of atrophy in semantic dementia.

    Anna M. Woollams;Karalyn Patterson;Karalyn Patterson

  • Connectionist Neuropsychology: Uncovering ultimate causes of acquired dyslexia

    Anna M. Woollams

  • How Word Meaning Influences Word Reading

    J. S. H. Taylor;Fiona J. Duff;Anna M. Woollams;Padraic Monaghan

  • The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning?

    Sachiko Kinoshita;Anna Woollams

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: The Human Conceptual System

    Anna Woollams;Karalyn Patterson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Karalyn Patterson
Karalyn Patterson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Paul F. Hoffman
Paul F. Hoffman University of Edinburgh
John R. Hodges
John R. Hodges University of Sydney
Olaf Hauk
Olaf Hauk MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
Timothy T. Rogers
Timothy T. Rogers University of Wisconsin–Madison
David C. Plaut
David C. Plaut Carnegie Mellon University
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London
Marc F. Joanisse
Marc F. Joanisse University of Western Ontario
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees in the USA offer flexibility and accessibility for students in various regions. Many colleges and universities provide full or part-time programs with different levels of academic rigor, allowing learners to choose pathways that fit their schedules and goals. For students seeking a streamlined approach, the easiest online psychology master's degrees in California can be a great option, offering reputable programs that balance quality and convenience.

Those located in other regions have varied choices as well. The Pennsylvania easiest psychology master's degree online options are popular for students who value strong faculty but want a more accessible admission route. Similarly, the easiest online psychology programs in the Midwest provide diverse opportunities across leading institutions in that part of the country.

Interested in location-specific options? The San Antonio psychology programs online cater to Texas-based students and those seeking programs with a local focus. No matter the choice, graduates can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, and research, or continue to advanced studies in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Anna M. Woollams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles