World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
6262
World Ranking
11576
National Ranking
350

Iain A. McCowan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain A. McCowan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 70 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Iain A. McCowan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iain A. McCowan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Iain A. McCowan is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia. The academic profile indicates engagement in scientific research at this institution, though specific research topics or publication details are not listed.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues documented in the available data, which limits detailed insight into their research outputs or collaboration networks.

No book publications or awards have been recorded, and information regarding main or subfields of study, as well as main research topics, is not provided. This absence of detailed bibliographic or thematic data makes it difficult to delineate specific areas of scientific focus or contributions.

The data does indicate that Iain A. McCowan is currently active and not deceased. As such, their ongoing affiliation with Queensland University of Technology suggests continuing involvement in academic or scientific activities within their domain.

Best Publications

  • The AMI meeting corpus: a pre-announcement

    Jean Carletta;Simone Ashby;Sebastien Bourban;Mike Flynn

  • Microphone array post-filter based on noise field coherence

    I.A. McCowan;H. Bourlard

  • The AMI meeting corpus

    I. McCowan;J. Carletta;W. Kraaij;S. Ashby

  • Semi-supervised adapted HMMs for unusual event detection

    Dong Zhang;D. Gatica-Perez;S. Bengio;I. McCowan

  • Modeling individual and group actions in meetings with layered HMMs

    Dong Zhang;D. Gatica-Perez;S. Bengio;I. McCowan

  • The multi-channel Wall Street Journal audio visual corpus (MC-WSJ-AV): specification and initial experiments

    M. Lincoln;I. McCowan;J. Vepa;H.K. Maganti

  • Robust speaker change detection

    J. Ajmera;I. McCowan;H. Bourlard

  • Automatic Analysis of Multimodal Group Actions in Meetings

    Iain A. McCowan;Daniel Gatica-Perez;Samy Bengio;Guillaume Lathoud

  • Speech/music segmentation using entropy and dynamism features in a HMM classification framework

    Jitendra Ajmera;Iain McCowan;Hervé Bourlard

  • Audiovisual Probabilistic Tracking of Multiple Speakers in Meetings

    D. Gatica-Perez;G. Lathoud;J.-M. Odobez;I. McCowan

  • Modeling human interaction in meetings

    I. McCowan;S. Bengio;D. Gatica-Perez;G. Lathoud

  • On the Use of Information Retrieval Measures for Speech Recognition Evaluation

    Iain A. McCowan;Darren Moore;John Dines;Daniel Gatica-Perez

  • Detecting group interest-level in meetings

    D. Gatica-Perez;L. McCowan;Dong Zhang;S. Bengio

  • Robust Speaker Recognition Using Microphone Arrays

    Iain A. McCowan;Jason W. Pelecanos;Sridha Sridharan

  • Unknown-Multiple Speaker clustering using HMM

    Jitendra Ajmera;Hervé Bourlard;I. Lapidot;Iain A. McCowan

  • Modeling Individual and Group Actions in Meetings: A Two-Layer HMM Framework

    Dong Zhang;D. Gatica-Perez;S. Bengio;I. McCowan

  • Microphone Array Shape Calibration in Diffuse Noise Fields

    I. McCowan;M. Lincoln;I. Himawan

  • Microphone array post-filter for diffuse noise field

    Iain A. McCowan;Herve Bourlard

  • Clustered Blind Beamforming From Ad-Hoc Microphone Arrays

    I Himawan;I McCowan;S Sridharan

  • Speech Enhancement and Recognition in Meetings With an Audio–Visual Sensor Array

    H.K. Maganti;D. Gatica-Perez;I. McCowan

  • The development of the AMI system for the transcription of speech in meetings

    Thomas Hain;Lukas Burget;John Dines;Iain McCowan

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Gatica-Perez
Daniel Gatica-Perez Idiap Research Institute
Hervé Bourlard
Hervé Bourlard Idiap Research Institute
Sridha Sridharan
Sridha Sridharan Queensland University of Technology
Samy Bengio
Samy Bengio Apple (United States)
Jean-Marc Odobez
Jean-Marc Odobez Idiap Research Institute
Thomas Hain
Thomas Hain University of Sheffield
Steve Renals
Steve Renals University of Edinburgh
Lukas Burget
Lukas Burget Brno University of Technology
Martin Karafiat
Martin Karafiat Brno University of Technology
Wessel Kraaij
Wessel Kraaij Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring associate's degree online programs is a great way to start your journey in Computer Science, especially if you’re looking for flexible, entry-level options. Many students prefer these online pathways for their convenience and adaptability to different schedules.

Cost is a major concern for many prospective students. Thankfully, there are affordable online colleges that make it possible to earn a quality degree without breaking the bank. Researching tuition rates and available financial aid can help you make a smart investment in your future.

Worried about a less-than-perfect academic record? Plenty of best online colleges that accept low gpa offer supportive environments and give many students a valuable second chance to succeed.

With a solid foundation in Computer Science, a variety of career paths become available. Similar to what can you get with an environmental science degree, Computer Science graduates can pursue roles in software development, cybersecurity, data analysis, and more—often with the flexibility of remote or hybrid work.

Best Scientists Citing Iain A. McCowan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles