World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
60
Citations
13745
World Ranking
2914
National Ranking
1146

Hans Moosmüller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Moosmüller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 207 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Hans Moosmüller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans Moosmüller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans Moosmüller is affiliated with the Desert Research Institute in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research focuses primarily on atmospheric processes, including atmospheric chemistry, aerosols, and the interactions of fire with ecosystems.

The main research topics covered by Hans Moosmüller include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

The subfields of study they have contributed to are:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Hans Moosmüller has published in several frequent scientific venues including:

  • Atmosphere
  • Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Fire

They have collaborated regularly with peers such as Vera Samburova, Andrey Khlystov, Deep Sengupta, Justin B. Maughan, and C. M. Sorensen.

Some of the recent notable publications by Hans Moosmüller include:

  • Previously unaccounted atmospheric mercury deposition in a midlatitude deciduous forest (2021) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Deposition of brown carbon onto snow: changes in snow optical and radiative properties (2020) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Evaluation of gas and particle sensors for detecting spacecraft-relevant fire emissions (2020) published in Fire Safety Journal
  • Mineral dust optical properties for remote sensing and global modeling: A review (2024) published in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Polar semivolatile organic compounds in biomass-burning emissions and their chemical transformations during aging in an oxidation flow reactor (2020) published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics

Best Publications

  • Aerosol light absorption and its measurement: A review

    H. Moosmüller;R.K. Chakrabarty;W.P. Arnott

  • Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols.

    Judith C Chow;John G Watson;L W Antony Chen;W Patrick Arnott

  • Towards Aerosol Light-Absorption Measurements with a 7-Wavelength Aethalometer: Evaluation with a Photoacoustic Instrument and 3-Wavelength Nephelometer

    W. Patrick Arnott;Khadeejeh Hamasha;Hans Moosmüller;Patrick J. Sheridan

  • Brown carbon in tar balls from smoldering biomass combustion

    R. K. Chakrabarty;H. Moosmüller;L.-W. A. Chen;K. Lewis

  • Emissions of trace gases and aerosols during the open combustion of biomass in the laboratory

    Gavin R. McMeeking;Gavin R. McMeeking;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Stephen Baker;Christian M. Carrico

  • Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light absorption by aerosol: instrument description

    W. Patrick Arnott;Hans Moosmüller;C. Fred Rogers;Tianfeng Jin

  • Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual-wavelength photoacoustic instrument

    Kristin Lewis;William P. Arnott;Hans Moosmüller;Cyle E. Wold

  • Absorption Ångström coefficient, brown carbon, and aerosols: basic concepts, bulk matter, and spherical particles

    H. Moosmüller;R. K. Chakrabarty;K. M. Ehlers;W. P. Arnott

  • An Inter-Comparison of Instruments Measuring Black Carbon Content of Soot Particles

    Jay G. Slowik;Eben S. Cross;Jeong-Ho Han;Paul Davidovits

  • Cloud condensation nucleation activity of biomass burning aerosol

    Markus D. Petters;Markus D. Petters;Christian M. Carrico;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Anthony J. Prenni

  • In situ aerosol optics in Reno, NV, USA during and after the summer 2008 California wildfires and the influence of absorbing and non-absorbing organic coatings on spectral light absorption

    M. Gyawali;W. P. Arnott;K. Lewis;H. Moosmüller

  • Characterizing elemental, equivalent black, and refractory black carbon aerosol particles: a review of techniques, their limitations and uncertainties

    Daniel A. Lack;Hans Moosmüller;Gavin R. McMeeking;Rajan K. Chakrabarty

  • Emissions from the laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: Particle morphology and size

    Rajan K. Chakrabarty;Hans Moosmüller;Mark A. Garro;Mark A. Garro;W. Patrick Arnott;W. Patrick Arnott

  • Emissions from laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: emission factors and source profiles.

    L.-W. Anthony Chen;Hans Moosmuller;W. Patrick Arnott;Judith C. Chow

  • Photoacoustic and filter-based ambient aerosol light absorption measurements : Instrument comparisons and the role of relative humidity

    W. P. Arnott;H. Moosmüller;P. J. Sheridan;J. A. Ogren

  • Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME)

    E. J. T. Levin;G. R. McMeeking;G. R. McMeeking;C. M. Carrico;L. E. Mack

  • Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity.

    Vera Samburova;Jessica Connolly;Madhu Gyawali;Reddy L.N. Yatavelli

  • The Reno Aerosol Optics Study: An Evaluation of Aerosol Absorption Measurement Methods

    Patrick J. Sheridan;W. Patrick Arnott;John A. Ogren;Elisabeth Andrews

  • Emissions of levoglucosan, methoxy phenols, and organic acids from prescribed burns, laboratory combustion of wildland fuels, and residential wood combustion.

    Lynn R Mazzoleni;Barbara Zielinska;Hans Moosmüller

  • Nitrogen dioxide and kerosene-flame soot calibration of photoacoustic instruments for measurement of light absorption by aerosols

    W. Patrick Arnott;Hans Moosmüller;John W. Walker

  • Ice nuclei emissions from biomass burning

    Markus D. Petters;Matthew T. Parsons;Matthew T. Parsons;Anthony J. Prenni;Paul J. DeMott

Frequent Co-Authors

John G. Watson
John G. Watson Desert Research Institute
Judith C. Chow
Judith C. Chow Desert Research Institute
Timothy B. Onasch
Timothy B. Onasch Boston College
Sonia M. Kreidenweis
Sonia M. Kreidenweis Colorado State University
Andrey Khlystov
Andrey Khlystov Desert Research Institute
Manvendra K. Dubey
Manvendra K. Dubey Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jeffrey L. Collett
Jeffrey L. Collett Colorado State University
Gavin R. McMeeking
Gavin R. McMeeking Colorado State University
L.-W. Antony Chen
L.-W. Antony Chen University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Douglas R. Worsnop
Douglas R. Worsnop University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, complementary online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many students explore an online bachelors degree programs in sociology to gain insight into social dynamics and community engagement, which are vital in environmental policy and advocacy roles.

Advancing to doctoral-level education is another option. Some professionals seek flexible options like a doctorate degree online no dissertation, allowing them to focus on applied knowledge without the traditional dissertation requirement.

For educators or those aiming for leadership in environmental education, programs that transition from eds to edd program provide a seamless path to deepen expertise while remaining fully online.

Additionally, those interested in social work connected to environmental justice may consider affordable options like the cheapest dsw program, blending social and environmental advocacy skills crucial for community impact roles.

Best Scientists Citing Hans Moosmüller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles