World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
10647
World Ranking
3998
National Ranking
1401

Ruth D. Yanai publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth D. Yanai sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 142 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Ruth D. Yanai D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth D. Yanai sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ruth D. Yanai is affiliated with SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry in the United States. Their research contributions span several core topics within environmental science, with a focus on forest ecology, nutrient dynamics, and carbon accounting.

Their work covers significant areas such as:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Forest management and policy
  • Soil and water nutrient dynamics

Yanai's main fields of study include Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, complemented by subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, Plant Science, and Atmospheric Science.

They have published extensively in various scientific venues, with a frequency of publications distributed mainly among:

  • Ecosystems
  • PeerJ
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Tree Physiology

Selected recent papers by Ruth D. Yanai demonstrate a focus on carbon cycling, nutrient constraints, and trace element behavior in forest ecosystems. These include:

  • Improving uncertainty in forest carbon accounting for REDD+ mitigation efforts, 2020, Environmental Research Letters
  • New Approaches to Understand Mercury in Trees: Radial and Longitudinal Patterns of Mercury in Tree Rings and Genetic Control of Mercury in Maple Sap, 2020, Water Air & Soil Pollution

Other recent related research publications, although authored by co-authors with Yanai involved in some capacity, include:

  • Foliar nutrient concentrations of six northern hardwood species responded to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization but did not predict tree growth, 2022, PeerJ
  • Fine Root Growth Increases in Response to Nitrogen Addition in Phosphorus-limited Northern Hardwood Forests, 2022, Ecosystems
  • N and P constrain C in ecosystems under climate change: Role of nutrient redistribution, accumulation, and stoichiometry, 2022, Ecological Applications

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Timothy J. Fahey
  • John L. Campbell
  • Jenna M. Zukswert
  • Melany C. Fisk
  • Mark B. Green

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • The Ecology of Root Lifespan

    D.M. Eissenstat;R.D. Yanai

  • Building roots in a changing environment: implications for root longevity

    D. M. Eissenstat;C. E. Wells;R. D. Yanai;J. L. Whitbeck

  • Soil Carbon Dynamics after Forest Harvest: An Ecosystem Paradigm Reconsidered

    Ruth D. Yanai;William S. Currie;Christine L. Goodale

  • The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook

    T. J. Fahey;T. G. Siccama;C. T. Driscoll;G. E. Likens

  • Challenges of measuring forest floor organic matter dynamics:: Repeated measures from a chronosequence

    Ruth D Yanai;Mary A Arthur;Thomas G Siccama;C.Anthony Federer

  • Estimating age-dependent costs and benefits of roots with contrasting life span: Comparing apples and oranges

    Tjeerd J. Bouma;Ruth D. Yanai;Adrienne D. Elkin;Ulrich Hartmond

  • BAAD: a Biomass And Allometry Database for woody plants

    Daniel S. Falster;Remko A. Duursma;Masae I. Ishihara;Diego R. Barneche

  • Modeling changes in red spruce carbon balance and allocation in response to interacting ozone and nutrient stresses.

    David A. Weinstein;Ronald M. Beloin;Ruth D. Yanai

  • Phosphorus budget of a 70-year-old northern hardwood forest

    Ruth D. Yanai

  • Wood ash effects on plant and soil in a willow bioenergy plantation

    Byung Bae Park;Ruth D. Yanai;James M. Sahm;Don K. Lee

  • Root Life Span, Efficiency, and Turnover

    Ruth Yanai;David Eissenstat

  • Detecting Change in Forest Floor Carbon

    Ruth D. Yanai;Stephen V. Stehman;Mary A. Arthur;Cindy E. Prescott

  • Soil nitrogen affects phosphorus recycling: foliar resorption and plant-soil feedbacks in a northern hardwood forest.

    Craig R. See;Ruth D. Yanai;Melany C. Fisk;Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur

  • ACCUMULATION AND DEPLETION OF BASE CATIONS IN FOREST FLOORS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES

    R. D. Yanai;T. G. Siccama;M. A. Arthur;C. A. Federer

  • The effect of whole-tree harvest on phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest

    Ruth D Yanai

  • The vertical and horizontal distribution of roots in northern hardwood stands of varying age

    Ruth D Yanai;Byung B Park;Steven P Hamburg

  • Efficiency of Nutrient Acquisition by Fine Roots and Mycorrhizae

    R.D. Yanai;T.J. Fahey;S.L. Miller

  • A Steady-State Model of Nutrient Uptake Accounting for Newly Grown Roots

    Ruth D. Yanai

  • Rates of sustainable forest harvest depend on rotation length and weathering of soil minerals

    Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur;Steven P. Hamburg;Ruth D. Yanai;Joel D. Blum

  • Estimating Uncertainty in Ecosystem Budget Calculations

    Ruth D. Yanai;John J. Battles;Andrew D. Richardson;Corrie A. Blodgett

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary A. Arthur
Mary A. Arthur University of Kentucky
Steven P. Hamburg
Steven P. Hamburg Environmental Defense Fund
Thomas G. Siccama
Thomas G. Siccama Yale University
Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur
Matthew A. Vadeboncoeur University of New Hampshire
Timothy J. Fahey
Timothy J. Fahey Cornell University
Charles T. Driscoll
Charles T. Driscoll Syracuse University
Melany C. Fisk
Melany C. Fisk Miami University
Joel D. Blum
Joel D. Blum University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David M. Eissenstat
David M. Eissenstat Pennsylvania State University
Douglas A. Burns
Douglas A. Burns United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in combining your background in Ecology and Evolution with healthcare, there are flexible online options to launch or advance your nursing career. Understanding how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner is an important first step. Some pathways, like accelerated RN to BSN programs, allow working nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree quickly—explore the top rn to bsn 6 months options for fast advancement.

For those holding an associate degree in nursing, specialized bridge programs make the transition to higher qualifications seamless. Learn more about rn to np bridge programs to streamline your journey toward becoming a nurse practitioner. Even if you are coming from a non-nursing background, there are online opportunities available. Discover online direct entry msn pathways designed for career changers who seek to enter the nursing field efficiently.

Online degree programs offer flexibility and a variety of career trajectories, helping science majors pivot into in-demand healthcare roles with speed and support.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth D. Yanai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles