World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emily F. Rothman

Emily F. Rothman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5595 5191 2651 2413 169 7874

Emily F. Rothman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emily F. Rothman between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emily F. Rothman published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2021. 29 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emily F. Rothman: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 1
2006 3
2007 6
2008 6
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 7
2013 3
2014 1
2015 11
2016 6
2017 16
2018 14
2019 13
2020 17
2021 31
2022 15
2023 21
2024 19
2025 10
Total 214
Download as CSV

Emily F. Rothman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily F. Rothman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 164–173 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391 169
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Emily F. Rothman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emily F. Rothman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Emily F. Rothman is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology, with extensive work in clinical psychology, sociology and political science, health, general health professions, and gender studies.

The scientist investigates a range of topics related to intimate partner and family violence, sex work and related issues, sexuality, behavior and technology, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, gender, feminism and media, autism spectrum disorder research, and sexual assault and victimization studies.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Sexuality Research and Social Policy
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy
  • CrimRxiv
  • Autism

Some of the recent papers authored by Emily F. Rothman are:

  • "The Prevalence of Using Pornography for Information About How to Have Sex: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey of U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults" (2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior)

Other notable papers where Rothman is part of the referenced research or co-authored work include:

  • "Should Public Health Professionals Consider Pornography a Public Health Crisis?" (2020, American Journal of Public Health)
  • "The Prevalence of Brain Injury Among Survivors and Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence and the Prevalence of Violence Victimization and Perpetration Among People With Brain Injury: a Scoping Review" (2022, Current Epidemiology Reports)
  • "Validation of a screening tool for labor and sex trafficking among emergency department patients" (2021, Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open)
  • "Social Anxiety as a Consequence of Non-consensually Disseminated Sexually Explicit Media Victimization" (2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rothman include:

  • Julia K. Campbell
  • Laura Graham Holmes
  • Elizabeth A. Mumford
  • Megan Bair-Merritt
  • Kimberly M. Nelson

Best Publications

  • Longitudinal Associations Between Teen Dating Violence Victimization and Adverse Health Outcomes

    Deinera Exner-Cortens;John Eckenrode;Emily Rothman

  • The Prevalence of Sexual Assault Against People Who Identify as Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual in the United States: A Systematic Review

    Emily Faith Rothman;Deinera Exner;Allyson L. Baughman

  • Beyond correlates: a review of risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence perpetration

    Kevin J. Vagi;Emily Faith Rothman;Natasha E. Latzman;Andra Teten Tharp

  • Adverse Childhood Experiences Predict Earlier Age of Drinking Onset: Results From a Representative US Sample of Current or Former Drinkers

    Emily F. Rothman;Erika M. Edwards;Timothy Heeren;Ralph W. Hingson

  • Parents' Supportive Reactions to Sexual Orientation Disclosure Associated With Better Health: Results From a Population-Based Survey of LGB Adults in Massachusetts

    Emily F. Rothman;Mairead Sullivan;Susan Keyes;Ulrike Boehmer

  • Past 15-year trends in adolescent marijuana use: Differences by race/ethnicity and sex.

    Renee M. Johnson;Brian Fairman;Tamika Gilreath;Ziming Xuan

  • "Without Porn … I Wouldn't Know Half the Things I Know Now": A Qualitative Study of Pornography Use Among a Sample of Urban, Low-Income, Black and Hispanic Youth.

    Emily Faith Rothman;Courtney Kaczmarsky;Nina Burke;Emily Jansen

  • The Effect of a College Sexual Assault Prevention Program on First-year Students' Victimization Rates

    Emily Rothman;Jay G. Silverman

  • How employment helps female victims of intimate partner violence: a qualitative study.

    Emily Faith Rothman;Jeanne Hathaway;Andrea Stidsen;Heather F. de Vries

  • Firearm Ownership and Suicide Rates Among US Men and Women, 1981-2013.

    Michael Siegel;Emily F. Rothman

  • State Intimate Partner Violence-Related Firearm Laws and Intimate Partner Homicide Rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015.

    Carolina Díez;Rachel P. Kurland;Emily F. Rothman;Megan Bair-Merritt

  • Does the Alcohol Make Them Do It? Dating Violence Perpetration and Drinking Among Youth

    Emily Faith Rothman;Luz McNaughton Reyes;Renee M. Johnson;Michael Lavalley

  • Revictimization After Adolescent Dating Violence in a Matched, National Sample of Youth

    Deinera Exner-Cortens;John Eckenrode;John Bunge;Emily Rothman

  • Childhood abuse and early menarche: findings from the black women's health study.

    Lauren A. Wise;Julie R. Palmer;Emily Faith Rothman;Lynn Rosenberg

  • Public health research priorities to address US human trafficking

    Emily F. Rothman;Hanni Stoklosa;Susie B. Baldwin;Makini Chisolm-Straker

  • Neighborhood-Level Factors Associated with Physical Dating Violence Perpetration: Results of a Representative Survey Conducted in Boston, MA

    Emily Faith Rothman;Renee M. Johnson;Robin Young;Janice Weinberg

  • Perpetration of physical assault against dating partners, peers, and siblings among a locally representative sample of high school students in Boston, massachusetts

    Emily Faith Rothman;Renee M. Johnson;Deborah R. Azrael;Diane M. Hall

  • Abusers' Perceptions of the Effect of Their Intimate Partner Violence on Children

    Emily Faith Rothman;David G. Mandel;Jay G. Silverman

  • PREVALENCE AND TYPES OF GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERY AMONG A SAMPLE OF TRANSGENDER ENDOCRINOLOGY PATIENTS PRIOR TO STATE EXPANSION OF INSURANCE COVERAGE

    Maya Kailas;Hsun Ming Simon Lu;Emily F. Rothman;Joshua D. Safer

  • The Prevalence of Using Pornography for Information About How to Have Sex: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey of U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults

    Emily F Rothman;Jonathon J Beckmeyer;Debby Herbenick;Tsung-Chieh Fu

  • ChildhoodAbuseandEarlyMenarche:Findings FromtheBlackWomen'sHealthStudy

    Lauren A. Wise;Julie R. Palmer;Emily F. Rothman;Lynn Rosenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory L. Stuart
Gregory L. Stuart University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Renee M. Johnson
Renee M. Johnson Johns Hopkins University
Jeffrey Temple
Jeffrey Temple The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Jay G. Silverman
Jay G. Silverman University of California, San Diego
David Hemenway
David Hemenway Harvard University
Michael Siegel
Michael Siegel Tufts University
Michele R. Decker
Michele R. Decker Johns Hopkins University
Elizabeth Reed
Elizabeth Reed San Diego State University
Anita Raj
Anita Raj University of California, San Diego
Timothy Heeren
Timothy Heeren Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in social sciences and humanities can open doors in counseling, therapy, psychology, social work, and more. With the rise of flexible learning, many reputable online degrees can prepare you for specialized roles in these growing fields.

For those considering counseling, it’s important to select cacrep accreditation programs, as these ensure strong academic standards and are often required for licensure. If your interests lie in relationship dynamics, there are also high-quality marriage and family therapy online programs accredited, which can help you gain necessary clinical skills from home.

Students looking for affordable options might consider the cheapest online psychology degree programs, which offer strong foundational knowledge at a lower cost. For those aiming for direct entry into social work, there are also msw programs with accessible admissions, equipping graduates for impactful roles in communities.

Each of these accredited online degrees provides unique pathways to meaningful careers, whether your passion is mental health, therapy, or social change.

Best Scientists Citing Emily F. Rothman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles