World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 46 1637 1465 975 849 130 12908

Richard C. Bishop publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard C. Bishop between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard C. Bishop published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2023. 13 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2023. 1970: 2 publications 1971: 2 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 4 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 7 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 2 publications
1970 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard C. Bishop: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 2
1971 2
1972 0
1973 2
1974 0
1975 4
1976 1
1977 2
1978 5
1979 3
1980 4
1981 2
1982 3
1983 1
1984 3
1985 4
1986 4
1987 5
1988 5
1989 0
1990 4
1991 3
1992 8
1993 3
1994 1
1995 7
1996 5
1997 8
1998 6
1999 4
2000 0
2001 2
2002 3
2003 6
2004 8
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 4
2010 6
2011 4
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 5
2017 3
2018 3
2019 5
2020 3
2021 1
2022 7
2023 11
2024 11
2025 2
Total 195
Download as CSV

Richard C. Bishop publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 127–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108 130
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Richard C. Bishop D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard C. Bishop sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78 46
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard C. Bishop is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with notable contributions primarily in Earth and Planetary Sciences and Business, Management and Accounting.

They focus on subfields such as Geochemistry and Petrology, Mechanics of Materials, Earth-Surface Processes, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Economics and Econometrics. Their work covers several main topics including Rock Mechanics and Modeling, Karst Systems and Hydrogeology, Landslides and related hazards, Economic and Environmental Valuation, Customer Service Quality and Loyalty, Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing, and 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard C. Bishop include:

  • Modified Design of Pillar Based on Estimated Stresses and Strength of Pillar in an Underground Limestone Mine, 2023, Mining Metallurgy & Exploration
  • On Adding-Up as a Validity Criterion for Stated-Preference Studies, 2021, Environmental and Resource Economics
  • Applications of Close-Range Terrestrial 3D Photogrammetry to Improve Safety in Underground Stone Mines, 2020, VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
  • 9 Respiratory microbiota in horses are individual-specific rather than biogeographically variable, 2023, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
  • ASSESSMENT OF CRITICAL RAW MATERIALS (CRM) IN PENNSYLVANIAN-AGE COALS AND ASSOCIATED SEDIMENTS OF THE CENTRAL APPALACHIAN BASIN, EASTERN U.S.A., 2025, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Frequent co-authors in their work include Aman Soni, Juan J. Monsalve, Nino Ripepi, Kevin Boyle, and Alessandro Migliorisi.

Their publications have appeared in several venues, illustrating a diverse research output, including:

  • Mining Metallurgy & Exploration
  • Environmental and Resource Economics
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
  • Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Richard C. Bishop has also contributed to the academic book market, with publications by Bloomsbury Professional eBooks and Bloomsbury Publishing plc. Titles include:

  • Articles of Association for Charities and Not for Profit Organisations: Guidance and Precedents (2020)
  • Law and Regulation of Community Interest Companies (2022)
  • Articles of Association: Guidance and Precedents (2020)

Best Publications

  • MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRAMARKET GOODS: ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED?

    Richard C. Bishop;Thomas A. Heberlein

  • Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?

    Richard C. Bishop;Thomas A. Heberlein

  • Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods

    Patricia A. Champ;Richard C. Bishop;Thomas C. Brown;Daniel W. McCollum

  • "Common Property" as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy * 1

    S. V. Ciriacy-Wantrup;Richard C. Bishop;Stephen O. Andersen

  • Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard

    Richard C. Bishop

  • Which response format reveals the truth about donations to a public good

    Thomas C. Brown;Patricia A. Champ;Richard C. Bishop;Daniel W. McCollum

  • Donation Payment Mechanisms and Contingent Valuation: An Empirical Study of Hypothetical Bias

    Patricia A. Champ;Richard C. Bishop

  • Welfare Measurements Using Contingent Valuation: A Comparison of Techniques

    Kevin J. Boyle;Richard C. Bishop

  • Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making

    Gail Bingham;Richard Bishop;Michael Brody;Daniel Bromley

  • The evolution of preferences Why 'sovereign' preferences may not lead to sustainable policies and what to do about it

    Bryan Norton;Robert Costanza;Richard C Bishop

  • Starting Point Bias in Contingent Valuation Bidding Games

    Kevin J. Boyle;Richard C. Bishop;Michael P. Welsh

  • Valuing wildlife in benefit‐cost analyses: A case study involving endangered species

    Kevin J. Boyle;Richard C. Bishop

  • The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies.

    Kevin J. Boyle;Michael P. Welsh;Richard C. Bishop

  • Option Value: An Exposition and Extension

    Unknown

  • The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources

    Unknown

  • Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation

    Thomas A. Heberlein;Matthew A. Wilson;Richard C. Bishop;Nora Cate Schaeffer

  • Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: comment

    Kevin Boyle;Michael P. Welsh;Richard C. Bishop

  • Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: comment

    Kevin J. Boyle;Michael P. Welsh;Richard C. Bishop

  • A Finite Mixture Logit Model of Recreational Angling with Serially Correlated Random Utility

    Bill Provencher;Kenneth A. Baerenklau;Richard C. Bishop

  • The Travel Cost Model for Lake Recreation: A Comparison of Two Methods for Incorporating Site Quality and Substitution Effects

    Peter P. Caulkins;Richard C. Bishop;Nicolaas W. Bouwes

  • How to Decide When Experts Disagree: Uncertainty-Based Choice Rules in Environmental Policy

    Richard T. Woodward;Richard C. Bishop

  • Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill

    Richard C. Bishop;Kevin J. Boyle;Richard T. Carson;David Chapman

  • Does accounting for preference heterogeneity improve the forecasting of a random utility model? A case study

    Bill Provencher;Richard C Bishop

  • A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias

    Patricia A. Champ;Rebecca Moore;Richard C. Bishop

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin J. Boyle
Kevin J. Boyle Virginia Tech
Jon A. Krosnick
Jon A. Krosnick Stanford University
Thomas A. Heberlein
Thomas A. Heberlein University of Wisconsin–Madison
V. Kerry Smith
V. Kerry Smith Arizona State University
Thomas C. Brown
Thomas C. Brown US Forest Service
Michael J. Welsh
Michael J. Welsh University of Iowa
W. Michael Hanemann
W. Michael Hanemann Arizona State University
Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Stanley Presser
Stanley Presser University of Maryland, College Park
John A. List
John A. List University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related degree programs and career paths. Today, many institutions offer flexible online options tailored for different career goals and personal circumstances.

For those seeking advanced business knowledge, you can explore online mba no gmat required programs, which waive standardized testing for experienced candidates. Cost-conscious learners may be interested in online mba under $30k programs, making high-quality business education more accessible and affordable.

The digital economy also offers exciting specialization options. Consider studying for an online marketing and social media degree to pursue roles in the growing fields of digital strategy or social brand management. Alternatively, graduate programs in hospitality—such as the best online hospitality management graduate programs—blend financial acumen with industry-specific leadership.

These online pathways equip you for careers in finance, management, marketing, and beyond—especially as organizations value flexible skills and real-world experience from accredited online programs.

Best Scientists Citing Richard C. Bishop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles