World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
7045
World Ranking
4775
National Ranking
193

Arnout R. H. Fischer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnout R. H. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 192 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Arnout R. H. Fischer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnout R. H. Fischer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnout R. H. Fischer is affiliated with Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands, engaging primarily in the Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their research contributions span several subfields, including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science, Social Psychology, Marketing, and Insect Science.

The scientist's work focuses on key topics such as Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Insect Utilization and Effects, Animal and Plant Science Education, Environmental Sustainability in Business, Genetically Modified Organisms Research, and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods.

Fischer has co-authored multiple papers with frequent collaborators such as Abhishek Nair, Petra Jorasch, Jessica Davies, Amrit K. Nanda, and Stacia Stetkiewicz. Their publications are commonly found in the following venues:

  • Food Quality and Preference
  • Journal of Insects as Food and Feed
  • Food and Energy Security
  • Emerald Open Research
  • Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Fischer include:

  • A meaningful reminder on sustainability: When explicit and implicit packaging cues meet, 2021, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • The price of sustainability: How consumers trade-off conventional packaging benefits against sustainability, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Consumer segments less or more willing to adopt foods with microalgae proteins, 2023, Food Quality and Preference
  • Potential Protein Production from Lignocellulosic Materials Using Edible Mushroom Forming Fungi, 2023, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
  • Consumer Moral Dilemma in the Choice of Animal-Friendly Meat Products, 2020, Sustainability

Best Publications

  • The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption

    M. J. Boland;A. N. Rae;J. M. Vereijken;M. P. M. Meuwissen

  • Insects as food: Exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance

    Hui Shan Grace Tan;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Patcharaporn Tinchan;Markus Stieger

  • Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification - a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lynn J. Frewer;Ivo A. van der Lans;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Machiel J. Reinders

  • Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review

    Nidhi Gupta;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects

    Hui Shan Grace Tan;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Hans C.M. van Trijp;Markus Stieger

  • Explicit and implicit attitude toward an emerging food technology: The case of cultured meat

    Gerben A. Bekker;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Hilde Tobi;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • Food4Me study: Validity and reliability of Food Choice Questionnaire in 9 European countries

    Jerko Markovina;Barbara J. Stewart-knox;Audrey Rankin;Mike Gibney

  • Consumer familiarity with foods and the perception of risks and benefits

    Arnout R.H. Fischer;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Toward improving food safety in the domestic environment: a multi-item Rasch scale for the measurement of the safety efficacy of domestic food-handling practices.

    Arnout R. H. Fischer;Lynn J. Frewer;Maarten J. Nauta

  • Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: An Interdisciplinary Investigation of Microbial Hazards During Food Preparation

    Arnout R. H. Fischer;Aarieke E. I. De Jong;Esther D. Van Asselt;Rob De Jonge

  • Consumer perceptions of best practice in food risk communication and management: Implications for risk analysis policy

    S.F. Cope;L.J. Frewer;J.R. Houghton;G. Rowe;G. Rowe

  • Risk/Benefit Communication about Food—A Systematic Review of the Literature

    L J Frewer;A R H Fischer;M Brennan;D Bánáti

  • Improving food safety in the domestic environment: the need for a transdisciplinary approach.

    Arnout R. H. Fischer;Aarieke E. I. De Jong;Rob De Jonge;Lynn J. Frewer

  • Consumer attitudes towards nanotechnologies applied to food production

    L.J. Frewer;N. Gupta;S. George;A.R.H. Fischer

  • Food Safety in the Domestic Environment: The Effect of Consumer Risk Information on Human Disease Risks

    Maarten J. Nauta;Arnout R. H. Fischer;Esther D. Van Asselt;Aarieke E. I. De Jong

  • The use of Delphi methodology in agrifood policy development: Some lessons learned

    L.J. Frewer;A.R.H. Fischer;M.T.A. Wentholt;H.J.P. Marvin

  • Meet meat: An explorative study on meat and cultured meat as seen by Chinese, Ethiopians and Dutch

    Gerben A. Bekker;Hilde Tobi;Arnout R.H. Fischer

  • To Think or Not to Think:The Effect of Cognitive Deliberation on the Influence of Injunctive Versus Descriptive Social Norms

    Vladimir Melnyk;Erica van Herpen;Arnout R.H. Fischer;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis

    Nidhi Gupta;Arnout R. H. Fischer;Ivo A. van der Lans;Lynn J. Frewer;Lynn J. Frewer

  • When Natural met Social: A Review of Collaboration between the Natural and Social Sciences

    Arnout R H Fischer;Hilde Tobi;Amber Ronteltap

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn J. Frewer
Lynn J. Frewer Newcastle University
Hans C.M. van Trijp
Hans C.M. van Trijp Wageningen University & Research
Evert Jacobsen
Evert Jacobsen Wageningen University & Research
Michael J. Gibney
Michael J. Gibney University College Dublin
Erica van Herpen
Erica van Herpen Wageningen University & Research
Joachim Scholderer
Joachim Scholderer Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Mariana C. Rufino
Mariana C. Rufino Lancaster University
Marinus J. M. Smulders
Marinus J. M. Smulders Wageningen University & Research
A. Veldkamp
A. Veldkamp University of Twente
Brendan Bunting
Brendan Bunting University of Ulster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA unlocks a variety of online degree paths, each offering unique career opportunities. Many students start by considering affordable online psychology degrees—ideal for those interested in understanding human behavior and pursuing roles in mental health or research.

For individuals inspired to become licensed counselors, enrolling in cacrep accredited schools is an important step. Accreditation ensures quality education, which is often required for certification and employment in counseling fields.

If helping families and couples appeals to you, explore marriage and family masters programs. These degrees train students to support clients facing relationship challenges, preparing graduates for licensure as therapists.

Social work is another rewarding pathway, with growing demand for compassionate professionals. For those seeking accessibility, there are msw schools offering flexible online options and manageable admission requirements.

Each online degree offers a flexible, affordable route to a fulfilling career in the expanding fields of human services and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Arnout R. H. Fischer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles