World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
30
Citations
5235
World Ranking
2957
National Ranking
85

Erica van Herpen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica van Herpen sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 89 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Erica van Herpen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica van Herpen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines

    Violeta Stefan;Erica van Herpen;Ana Alina Tudoran;Liisa Lähteenmäki

  • Missing Food, Missing Data? A Critical Review of Global Food Losses and Food Waste Data

    Li Xue;Gang Liu;Julian Parfitt;Xiaojie Liu

  • Consumer response to packaging design: The role of packaging materials and graphics in sustainability perceptions and product evaluations

    Nigel D. Steenis;Erica van Herpen;Ivo A. van der Lans;Tom N. Ligthart

  • Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels: Their Effect on Attention and Choices when Consumers have Varying Goals and Time Constraints

    Erica van Herpen;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • When demand accelerates demand: Trailing the bandwagon

    Erica van Herpen;Rik Pieters;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Research Note: The Variety of an Assortment: An Extension to the Attribute-Based Approach

    Erica van Herpen;Rik Pieters

  • Can a virtual supermarket bring realism into the lab? Comparing shopping behavior using virtual and pictorial store representations to behavior in a physical store

    Erica van Herpen;Eva van den Broek;Hans C.M. van Trijp;Tian Yu

  • Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging

    Nigel D. Steenis;Ivo A. van der Lans;Erica van Herpen;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • Comparing wasted apples and oranges: An assessment of methods to measure household food waste

    Erica van Herpen;Ivo A. van der Lans;Nancy Holthuysen;Mariska Nijenhuis-de Vries

  • Food waste as the consequence of competing motivations, lack of opportunities, and insufficient abilities

    Lisanne van Geffen;Erica van Herpen;Siet Sijtsema;Hans van Trijp

  • The relationship between in-store marketing and observed sales for organic versus fair trade products

    Erica van Herpen;Erjen van Nierop;Laurens Sloot

  • Household Food Waste—How to Avoid It? An Integrative Review

    Unknown

  • How to reduce consumer food waste at household level: A literature review on drivers and levers for behavioural change

    Unknown

  • Consumers' evaluations of socially responsible activities in retailing

    E. van Herpen;J.M.E. Pennings;M.T.G. Meulenberg

  • Regulatory fit effects for injunctive versus descriptive social norms: Evidence from the promotion of sustainable products

    Vladimir Melnyk;Erica van Herpen;Arnout R. H. Fischer;Hans C. M. van Trijp

  • A validated survey to measure household food waste

    Erica van Herpen;Lisanne van Geffen;Mariska Nijenhuis-de Vries;Nancy Holthuysen

  • How Product Scarcity Impacts on Choice: Snob and Bandwagon Effects

    E. van Herpen;F.G.M. Pieters;M. Zeelenberg

  • Inferring Product Healthfulness from Nutrition Labelling: The Influence of Reference Points.

    Erica van Herpen;Sophie Hieke;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • The role of familiarity in front-of-pack label evaluation and use: A comparison between the United Kingdom and The Netherlands

    Erica van Herpen;Ellen Seiss;Hans C.M. van Trijp

  • Organics unpacked: The influence of packaging on the choice for organic fruits and vegetables

    Erica van Herpen;Victor Immink;Jos van den Puttelaar

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans C.M. van Trijp
Hans C.M. van Trijp Wageningen University & Research
Rik Pieters
Rik Pieters Tilburg University
Arnout R. H. Fischer
Arnout R. H. Fischer Wageningen University & Research
Marcel Zeelenberg
Marcel Zeelenberg Tilburg University
Liisa Lähteenmäki
Liisa Lähteenmäki Aarhus University
Bart J. Bronnenberg
Bart J. Bronnenberg Tilburg University
Wim Verbeke
Wim Verbeke Ghent University
Monique Raats
Monique Raats University of Surrey
Marco Bertini
Marco Bertini University of Florence
Brian Wansink
Brian Wansink Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Erica van Herpen

Recently Published Articles