World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcel Zeelenberg

Marcel Zeelenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
84
Citations
40623
World Ranking
1208
National Ranking
68

Marcel Zeelenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 338 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marcel Zeelenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcel Zeelenberg is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily centers on psychology, with a focus on both broad and specialized subfields including social psychology, applied psychology, economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, and general decision sciences.

Their work has appeared frequently in journals such as Emotion, SSRN Electronic Journal, Current Opinion in Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Zeelenberg's published research covers several key topics including psychological well-being and life satisfaction, decision-making and behavioral economics, behavioral health and interventions, cultural differences and values, emotions and moral behavior, personality traits and psychology, and social and intergroup psychology.

  • Supervised machine learning methods in psychology: A practical introduction with annotated R code (2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • What we talk about when we talk about hope: A prototype analysis (2020, Emotion)
  • The good, bad and ugly of dispositional greed (2022, Current Opinion in Psychology)
  • When enough is not enough: Overearning as a manifestation of dispositional greed (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Dispositional Greed Scales (2021, European Journal of Psychological Assessment)

Marcel Zeelenberg has collaborated extensively, with frequent co-authors including Seger M. Breugelmans, Karlijn Hoyer, Christoph Kogler, Hannes Rosenbusch, and Anthony M. Evans. The number of joint publications ranges from 6 to 20 with these collaborators.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Data analysis 2

    Fieke M. A. Wagemans;Mark Brandt;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services

    M. Zeelenberg;R. Pieters

  • A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Angry Customers Don't Come Back, They Get Back: The Experience and Behavioral Implications of Anger and Dissatisfaction in Services

    Roger Bougie;Rik Pieters;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making

    Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Leveling up and down: the experiences of benign and malicious envy.

    Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Regret in Decision Making

    Terry Connolly;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Wilco W. van Dijk;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Joop van der Pligt

  • Consequences of regret aversion : effects of expected feedback on risky decision making

    M Marcel Zeelenberg;J Beattie;van der J Pligt;de Nk Koen Vries

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing

    Irene Blanken;Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rob M. A. Nelissen;Seger M. Breugelmans;Rik Pieters

  • Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability

    J.J. Inman;M. Zeelenberg

  • Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment.

    M. Zeelenberg;W. W. van Dijk;J. van der Pligt;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead

  • Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel like Losing

    Ziv Carmon;Klaus Wertenbroch;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • “Never eat in that restaurant, I did!”: Exploring why people engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication

    Inge M. Wetzer;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit.

    Maria J. Louro;Rik Pieters;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt

    Ilona E. de Hooge;Marcel Zeelenberg;Seger M. Breugelmans

  • Why Envy Outperforms Admiration

    Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Comparing Service Delivery to What Might Have Been: Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

Frequent Co-Authors

Seger M. Breugelmans
Seger M. Breugelmans Tilburg University
Rik Pieters
Rik Pieters Tilburg University
Mark J. Brandt
Mark J. Brandt Michigan State University
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet Wageningen University & Research
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
Joop van der Pligt
Joop van der Pligt University of Amsterdam
J. Jeffrey Inman
J. Jeffrey Inman University of Pittsburgh
Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to various pathways, including specialized fields like substance abuse counseling. The journey to becoming a counselor can differ by location, reflecting state-specific requirements for education, certification, and practical experience. For example, individuals interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Dallas should pay close attention to Texas licensing guidelines and the need for approved internships.

In other regions, such as Colorado, aspiring professionals should be aware of the particular Denver substance abuse counselors education requirements. Similarly, for those seeking to work in Michigan, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Detroit can involve both academic and clinical supervision components before independent practice is permitted.

North Carolina also presents unique criteria; those pursuing this path should understand Durham substance abuse counselor certification requirements regarding coursework and licensing exams. Choosing an accredited online psychology degree or certification program is an effective way to meet regional rules while balancing work and studies, setting you up for a successful mental health career nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Zeelenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles