World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcel Zeelenberg

Marcel Zeelenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 84 1208 1062 68 63 338 40623

Marcel Zeelenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcel Zeelenberg between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcel Zeelenberg published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2018. 19 of the 398 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2018. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 18 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

398 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcel Zeelenberg: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 9
1997 4
1998 14
1999 18
2000 5
2001 3
2002 8
2003 7
2004 9
2005 14
2006 11
2007 20
2008 17
2009 12
2010 9
2011 21
2012 19
2013 20
2014 19
2015 16
2016 21
2017 18
2018 25
2019 9
2020 10
2021 13
2022 10
2023 9
2024 7
2025 18
2026 1
Total 398
Download as CSV

Marcel Zeelenberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 338 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 338
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcel Zeelenberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Zeelenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86 84
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcel Zeelenberg is affiliated with Tilburg University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily centers on psychology, with a focus on both broad and specialized subfields including social psychology, applied psychology, economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, and general decision sciences.

Their work has appeared frequently in journals such as Emotion, SSRN Electronic Journal, Current Opinion in Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Zeelenberg's published research covers several key topics including psychological well-being and life satisfaction, decision-making and behavioral economics, behavioral health and interventions, cultural differences and values, emotions and moral behavior, personality traits and psychology, and social and intergroup psychology.

  • Supervised machine learning methods in psychology: A practical introduction with annotated R code (2021, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • What we talk about when we talk about hope: A prototype analysis (2020, Emotion)
  • The good, bad and ugly of dispositional greed (2022, Current Opinion in Psychology)
  • When enough is not enough: Overearning as a manifestation of dispositional greed (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Dispositional Greed Scales (2021, European Journal of Psychological Assessment)

Marcel Zeelenberg has collaborated extensively, with frequent co-authors including Seger M. Breugelmans, Karlijn Hoyer, Christoph Kogler, Hannes Rosenbusch, and Anthony M. Evans. The number of joint publications ranges from 6 to 20 with these collaborators.

Best Publications

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Alexander A. Aarts;Joanna E. Anderson;Christopher J. Anderson;Peter R. Attridge;Peter R. Attridge

  • Data analysis 2

    Fieke M. A. Wagemans;Mark Brandt;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Beyond valence in customer dissatisfaction: A review and new findings on behavioral responses to regret and disappointment in failed services

    M. Zeelenberg;R. Pieters

  • A Theory of Regret Regulation 1.0

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Angry Customers Don't Come Back, They Get Back: The Experience and Behavioral Implications of Anger and Dissatisfaction in Services

    Roger Bougie;Rik Pieters;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making

    Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Leveling up and down: the experiences of benign and malicious envy.

    Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Regret in Decision Making

    Terry Connolly;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • On bad decisions and disconfirmed expectancies: The psychology of regret and disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Wilco W. van Dijk;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead;Joop van der Pligt

  • Consequences of regret aversion : effects of expected feedback on risky decision making

    M Marcel Zeelenberg;J Beattie;van der J Pligt;de Nk Koen Vries

  • A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing

    Irene Blanken;Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rob M. A. Nelissen;Seger M. Breugelmans;Rik Pieters

  • Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability

    J.J. Inman;M. Zeelenberg

  • Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Decisions: The Role of Counterfactual Thought in the Experience of Regret and Disappointment.

    M. Zeelenberg;W. W. van Dijk;J. van der Pligt;Antony Stephen Reid Manstead

  • Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel like Losing

    Ziv Carmon;Klaus Wertenbroch;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • “Never eat in that restaurant, I did!”: Exploring why people engage in negative word‐of‐mouth communication

    Inge M. Wetzer;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit.

    Maria J. Louro;Rik Pieters;Marcel Zeelenberg

  • Moral sentiments and cooperation: Differential influences of shame and guilt

    Ilona E. de Hooge;Marcel Zeelenberg;Seger M. Breugelmans

  • Why Envy Outperforms Admiration

    Niels van de Ven;Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

  • Comparing Service Delivery to What Might Have Been: Behavioral Responses to Regret and Disappointment

    Marcel Zeelenberg;Rik Pieters

Frequent Co-Authors

Seger M. Breugelmans
Seger M. Breugelmans Tilburg University
Rik Pieters
Rik Pieters Tilburg University
Mark J. Brandt
Mark J. Brandt Michigan State University
Eric van Dijk
Eric van Dijk Leiden University
Emely de Vet
Emely de Vet Wageningen University & Research
Thomas Gilovich
Thomas Gilovich Cornell University
Joop van der Pligt
Joop van der Pligt University of Amsterdam
J. Jeffrey Inman
J. Jeffrey Inman University of Pittsburgh
Henk Aarts
Henk Aarts Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to various pathways, including specialized fields like substance abuse counseling. The journey to becoming a counselor can differ by location, reflecting state-specific requirements for education, certification, and practical experience. For example, individuals interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Dallas should pay close attention to Texas licensing guidelines and the need for approved internships.

In other regions, such as Colorado, aspiring professionals should be aware of the particular Denver substance abuse counselors education requirements. Similarly, for those seeking to work in Michigan, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Detroit can involve both academic and clinical supervision components before independent practice is permitted.

North Carolina also presents unique criteria; those pursuing this path should understand Durham substance abuse counselor certification requirements regarding coursework and licensing exams. Choosing an accredited online psychology degree or certification program is an effective way to meet regional rules while balancing work and studies, setting you up for a successful mental health career nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Zeelenberg

Trending Scientists