World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
71
Citations
38166
World Ranking
2142
National Ranking
972

Temple F. Smith publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Temple F. Smith sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 182 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Temple F. Smith D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Temple F. Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Temple F. Smith is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cancer Research.

The scientist's research focuses on areas such as Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer, Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy, and MicroRNA in disease regulation. These topics reflect a consistent interest in understanding molecular processes underlying cancer development and therapeutic responses.

Temple F. Smith has contributed to scholarly publications, including the following paper:

  • Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies KEAP1 perturbation as a vulnerability of ARID1A-deficient cells, 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Throughout their research career, they have collaborated with several frequent coauthors including Louis-Alexandre Fournier, Forouh Kalantari, JP. Wells, Lee Js, and Genny Trigo-Gonzalez.

The primary venue for publishing their research has been bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Identification of common molecular subsequences.

    T.F. Smith;M.S. Waterman

  • Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.

    Andrew G. Clark;Michael B. Eisen;Michael B. Eisen;Douglas R. Smith;Casey M. Bergman

  • The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins

    Eva J. Neer;Carl J. Schmidt;Raman Nambudripad;Temple F. Smith

  • Comparison of biosequences

    Temple F Smith;Michael S Waterman

  • The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions.

    Temple F Smith;Chrysanthe Gaitatzes;Kumkum Saxena;Eva J Neer

  • Some Biological Sequence Metrics

    M.S Waterman;T.F Smith;W.A Beyer

  • Comparison of the Complete Protein Sets of Worm and Yeast: Orthology and Divergence

    Stephen A. Chervitz;L. Aravind;Gavin Sherlock;Catherine A. Ball

  • The challenges of genome sequence annotation or "the devil is in the details".

    Temple F. Smith;Xiaolin Zhang

  • Operons in Escherichia coli: genomic analyses and predictions.

    Heladia Salgado;Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb;Temple F. Smith;Julio Collado-Vides

  • Prediction of gene structure.

    Roderic Guigó;Steen Knudsen;Neil Drake;Temple Smith

  • A fundamental division in the Alu family of repeated sequences.

    Jerzy Jurka;Temple Smith

  • Comparative biosequence metrics.

    T. F. Smith;M. S. Waterman;W. M. Fitch

  • Automatic generation of primary sequence patterns from sets of related protein sequences

    Randall F. Smith;Temple F. Smith

  • Pattern-induced multi-sequence alignment (PIMA) algorithm employing secondary structure-dependent gap penalties for use in comparative protein modelling.

    R F Smith;T F Smith

  • RNA secondary structure: a complete mathematical analysis

    M.S. Waterman;T.F. Smith

  • Identification of three related human GRO genes encoding cytokine functions

    Stephen Haskill;Amy Peace;John Morris;Sarah A. Sporn

  • Optimal sequence alignments

    Walter M. Fitch;Temple F. Smith

  • Reconstruction of Ancient Molecular Phylogeny

    Roderic Guigo;Ilya Muchnik;Temple F. Smith

  • In silico detection of control signals: mRNA 3′-end-processing sequences in diverse species

    Joel H. Graber;Charles R. Cantor;Scott C. Mohr;Temple F. Smith

  • Automatic generation of primary sequence patterns from sets of related protein sequences (amino acid/sequence comparison/protein families/cluster analysis/dynamic programming)

    Randall F. Smith;Temple F. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Waterman
Michael S. Waterman University of Southern California
Eva J. Neer
Eva J. Neer Brigham and Women's Hospital
William M. Gelbart
William M. Gelbart University of California, Los Angeles
Walter M. Fitch
Walter M. Fitch University of California, Irvine
Roderic Guigó
Roderic Guigó Pompeu Fabra University
Jerzy Jurka
Jerzy Jurka Genetic Information Research Institute
Julio Collado-Vides
Julio Collado-Vides National Autonomous University of Mexico
Sandor Vajda
Sandor Vajda Boston University
John Samuelson
John Samuelson Boston University
David Botstein
David Botstein Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in complementing your study of Genetics with other healthcare fields? The U.S. offers a variety of flexible online degree options, fitting many interests and career ambitions. For those considering a career in nursing, you might be wondering: do all nursing schools require the teas exam? Some schools have alternative admissions pathways, expanding your options.

If healthcare management appeals to you, mha online programs can prepare you for leadership roles without interrupting your current commitments. For quicker entry into the nursing field, explore the shortest lpn program options available online.

For those seeking advanced practice or academic roles, affordable doctoral programs like the cheapest dnp programs online provide flexible pathways to the highest nursing credentials. These diverse options open doors to a range of rewarding careers alongside or beyond genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Temple F. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles