World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
73
Citations
38587
World Ranking
1998
National Ranking
908

Walter M. Fitch publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter M. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 153 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Walter M. Fitch D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Walter M. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1989 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

Walter M. Fitch was affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their academic career involved contributions to scientific research, although specific details regarding research topics, papers, or co-authors are not documented in the available data.

Throughout their career, Fitch was recognized by prominent scientific organizations. In 1989, they became a Member of the National Academy of Sciences. Later, in 1994, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). These affiliations indicate acknowledgement by peers within the scientific community.

The data does not provide explicit information regarding Fitch's main fields of study, subfields, or specific research topics. There are also no listed recent papers, frequent publication venues, or documented book publications. This limits direct insight into the specific areas of science in which they contributed.

Despite the absence of detailed publication records and collaboration networks, the awards and affiliations suggest that Walter M. Fitch played a role in advancing scientific knowledge within their academic domain during their career.

Best Publications

  • Toward Defining the Course of Evolution: Minimum Change for a Specific Tree Topology

    Walter M. Fitch

  • Construction of Phylogenetic Trees

    Walter M. Fitch;Emanuel Margoliash

  • Distinguishing Homologous From Analogous Proteins

    Walter M. Fitch

  • Homology: a personal view on some of the problems

    Walter M. Fitch

  • A natural classification of the basic helix–loop–helix class of transcription factors

    William R. Atchley;Walter M. Fitch

  • An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution

    Walter M. Fitch;Etan Markowitz

  • TESTING SPECIES PHYLOGENIES AND PHYLOGENETIC METHODS WITH CONGRUENCE

    Michael M. Miyamoto;Walter M. Fitch

  • Predicting the evolution of human influenza A.

    Robin M. Bush;Catherine A. Bender;Kanta Subbarao;Nancy J. Cox

  • “Homology” in proteins and nucleic acids: A terminology muddle and a way out of it

    Gerald R. Reeck;Christoph de Haën;David C. Teller;Russell F. Doolittle

  • An examination of the constancy of the rate of molecular evolution

    Charles H. Langley;Walter M. Fitch

  • Long term trends in the evolution of H(3) HA1 human influenza type A

    Walter M. Fitch;Robin M. Bush;Catherine A. Bender;Nancy J. Cox

  • Positive Darwinian evolution in human influenza A viruses.

    Walter M. Fitch;Josef M. E. Leiter;Xingqiang Li;Peter Palese

  • An improved method of testing for evolutionary homology.

    Walter M. Fitch

  • Comparative biosequence metrics.

    T. F. Smith;M. S. Waterman;W. M. Fitch

  • Positive selection on the H3 hemagglutinin gene of human influenza virus A.

    Robin M. Bush;Walter M. Fitch;Catherine A. Bender;Nancy J. Cox

  • Correlations Among Amino Acid Sites in bHLH Protein Domains: An Information Theoretic Analysis

    William R. Atchley;Kurt R. Wollenberg;Walter M. Fitch;Werner Terhalle

  • Evolution of human influenza A viruses over 50 years: rapid, uniform rate of change in NS gene

    Deborah A. Buonagurio;Susumu Nakada;Jeffrey D. Parvin;Mark Krystal

  • Covalent structure of human haptoglobin: a serine protease homolog

    Alexander Kurosky;Don R. Barnett;Tong-Ho Lee;Billy Touchstone

  • Optimal sequence alignments

    Walter M. Fitch;Temple F. Smith

  • Tempo and mode in evolution.

    W M Fitch;F J Ayala

Frequent Co-Authors

Francisco J. Ayala
Francisco J. Ayala University of California, Irvine
Stephan Ludwig
Stephan Ludwig University of Münster
Christoph Scholtissek
Christoph Scholtissek University of Giessen
Temple F. Smith
Temple F. Smith Boston University
Nancy J. Cox
Nancy J. Cox Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Marco Salemi
Marco Salemi University of Florida
Michael M. Miyamoto
Michael M. Miyamoto University of Florida
Peter Palese
Peter Palese Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jaap J. Beintema
Jaap J. Beintema University of Groningen
Charles H. Langley
Charles H. Langley University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, there are various online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many students complement their studies in genetics with training in nursing and healthcare fields. Pursuing healthcare degrees can open doors to a range of career options, including research, laboratory work, and clinical practice.

For those looking to advance their nursing qualifications, there are online np programs designed for flexibility and affordability. In addition to nurse practitioner tracks, students can explore low cost nursing programs that provide a solid foundation for healthcare professionals.

If you already hold a BSN and are seeking leadership or research roles, the most affordable bsn to dnp programs online deliver advanced skills to help shape healthcare systems. Registered nurses can also find cheap rn to bsn programs to enhance their credentials and prepare for more specialized career paths.

These related options are excellent for students aiming to blend their passion for genetics with real-world healthcare experience, paving the way for diverse and rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Walter M. Fitch

Recently Published Articles