World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
111
Citations
54817
World Ranking
926
National Ranking
578

William M. Gelbart publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Gelbart sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 317 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

William M. Gelbart D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Gelbart sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 111 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1998 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1987 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For his many contributions to the light scattering and phase transition properties of simple fluids, liquid crystals, and surfactant solutions
  • 1974 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

William M. Gelbart is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions encompassing Molecular Biology, Ecology, Plant Science, Endocrinology, and Immunology.

The scientist's published work includes a variety of topics such as bacteriophages and microbial interactions, plant virus research studies, RNA interference and gene delivery, plant and fungal interactions research, RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms, CAR-T cell therapy research, and viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology.

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on viral structure, RNA-protein interactions, and virus particle assembly. These include:

  • Genome organization and interaction with capsid protein in a multipartite RNA virus (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Single-particle studies of the effects of RNA-protein interactions on the self-assembly of RNA virus particles (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Controlling the surface charge of simple viruses (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • Multiple Nucleocapsid Structural Forms of Shrimp White Spot Syndrome Virus Suggests a Novel Viral Morphogenetic Pathway (2023, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • In Vivo Delivery of Spherical and Cylindrical In Vitro Reconstituted Virus-like Particles Containing the Same Self-Amplifying mRNA (2024, Molecular Pharmaceutics)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with William M. Gelbart include:

  • Charles M. Knobler
  • Cheylene Tanimoto
  • Christian Beren
  • Rees F. Garmann
  • Ana L. Durán-Meza

The principal publication venues for their work consist of:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • PLoS ONE
  • Journal of Molecular Biology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Molecular Pharmaceutics

Throughout their career, William M. Gelbart has received several fellowships recognizing their contributions to science, including being a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2009), the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (1998), the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1992), the American Physical Society (APS) (1987) with a specific citation for work on light scattering and phase transition properties in various materials, and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1974).

Best Publications

  • The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster

    M. D. Adams;S. E. Celniker;R. A. Holt;C. A. Evans

  • Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.

    Andrew G. Clark;Michael B. Eisen;Michael B. Eisen;Douglas R. Smith;Casey M. Bergman

  • Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes

    Gerald M. Rubin;Mark D. Yandell;Jennifer R. Wortman;George L. Gabor

  • Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera

    George M. Weinstock;Gene E. Robinson;Richard A. Gibbs;Kim C. Worley

  • Genome sequence of Aedes aegypti, a major arbovirus vector

    Vishvanath Nene;Jennifer R. Wortman;Daniel Lawson;Brian Haas

  • A transcript from a Drosophila pattern gene predicts a protein homologous to the transforming growth factor- β family

    Richard W. Padgett;R. Daniel St. Johnston;William M. Gelbart

  • Thermodynamic Control of Gold Nanocrystal Size: Experiment and Theory

    Daniel V. Leff;Pamela C. Ohara;James R. Heath;William M. Gelbart

  • Genetic Characterization and Cloning of Mothers against Dpp, a Gene Required for Decapentaplegic Function in Drosophila Melanogaster

    Jeff J. Sekelsky;Stuart J. Newfeld;Laurel A. Raftery;Elena H. Chartoff

  • Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures

    Alexander Stark;Michael F Lin;Pouya Kheradpour;Jakob Skou Pedersen;Jakob Skou Pedersen

  • Micelles, Membranes, Microemulsions, and Monolayers

    William M. Gelbart;Avinoam Ben-Shaul;Didier Roux

  • Nonradiative electronic relaxation under collision-free conditions

    Phaedon. Avouris;William M. Gelbart;M. A. El-Sayed

  • DNA‐Inspired Electrostatics

    William M. Gelbart;Robijn F. Bruinsma;Philip A. Pincus;V. Adrian Parsegian

  • Comparative genome and proteome analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster.

    Evgeny M. Zdobnov;Christian Von Mering;Ivica Letunic;David Torrents

  • Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: Chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution

    Stephen Richards;Yue Liu;Brian R. Bettencourt;Pavel Hradecky

  • Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes

    Daniel E. Neafsey;Robert M. Waterhouse;Mohammad R. Abai;Sergey S. Aganezov

  • Counterion-Induced Attraction between Rigid Polyelectrolytes

    Niels Grønbech-Jensen;Niels Grønbech-Jensen;Robert J. Mashl;Robijn F. Bruinsma;William M. Gelbart

  • The Transmembrane Tyrosine Phosphatase DLAR Controls Motor Axon Guidance in Drosophila

    Neil X Krueger;David Van Vactor;Hong I Wan;William M Gelbart

  • Crystallization of opals from polydisperse nanoparticles

    Pamela C. Ohara;Daniel V. Leff;James R. Heath;William M. Gelbart

  • Decapentaplegic: A gene complex affecting morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster

    Forrest A. Spencer;F.Michael Hoffmann;William M. Gelbart

  • Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review.

    Sima Misra;Madeline A Crosby;Christopher J Mungall;Beverley B Matthews

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey H Miller
Jeffrey H Miller University of California, Los Angeles
Richard C Lewontin
Richard C Lewontin Harvard University
Avinoam Ben-Shaul
Avinoam Ben-Shaul Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Charles M. Knobler
Charles M. Knobler University of California, Los Angeles
Igal Szleifer
Igal Szleifer Northwestern University
James R. Heath
James R. Heath California Institute of Technology
Evgeny M. Zdobnov
Evgeny M. Zdobnov Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Karl F. Freed
Karl F. Freed University of Chicago
Frank H. Collins
Frank H. Collins University of Notre Dame
Zhen-Gang Wang
Zhen-Gang Wang California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you chart your education journey in Biology or Biochemistry, considering related online degrees can offer new career options in healthcare and research. For those seeking leadership positions in hospitals or the health sector, online mha programs cahme accredited are a flexible way to gain the management skills employers value, all while ensuring quality standards through CAHME accreditation.

If direct patient care appeals to you but you want a more academic approach, Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs are now available virtually—even with options for a dnp program without clinical hours, which is a great solution for working professionals or those with healthcare experience.

For those interested in research or high-level administration, there are opportunities like a phd in healthcare management online. Pharmacists seeking to advance their credentials can also explore specialized online pharm d programs.

These online programs blend scientific study with practical leadership and clinical knowledge, opening up diverse career pathways for students of Biology and Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing William M. Gelbart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles