World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amanda Jensen-Doss

Amanda Jensen-Doss

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9783 9155 5177 4727 109 6105

Amanda Jensen-Doss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Jensen-Doss between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Jensen-Doss published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 11 of the 124 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

124 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Jensen-Doss: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 2
2011 3
2012 2
2013 4
2014 5
2015 4
2016 3
2017 6
2018 11
2019 8
2020 12
2021 14
2022 12
2023 7
2024 12
2025 10
2026 1
Total 124
Download as CSV

Amanda Jensen-Doss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Jensen-Doss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 109
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Jensen-Doss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Jensen-Doss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Jensen-Doss is affiliated with the University of Miami in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Health Professions, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology and related subfields.

Their scholarly work covers multiple aspects of child and adolescent mental health, emphasizing measurement-based care and mental health service implementation. Key topics they address include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, health policy implementation science, mental health treatment and access, psychotherapy techniques and applications, digital mental health interventions, behavioral and psychological studies, and attachment and relationship dynamics.

Recent publications by Amanda Jensen-Doss include:

  • Measurement-based Care as a Practice Improvement Tool: Clinical and Organizational Applications in Youth Mental Health, 2020, Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health
  • What Gets Measured Gets Done: How Mental Health Agencies can Leverage Measurement-Based Care for Better Patient Care, Clinician Supports, and Organizational Goals, 2020, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • To Utility and Beyond! Specifying and Advancing the Utility of Measurement-Based Care for Youth, 2022, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • What is the Status of Multi-Informant Treatment Fidelity Research?, 2022, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Editorial Statement About JCCAP's 2023 Special Issue on Informant Discrepancies in Youth Mental Health Assessments: Observations, Guidelines, and Future Directions Grounded in 60 Years of Research, 2023, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jensen-Doss include Elizabeth Casline, Zabin S. Patel, Grace S. Woodard, Jill Ehrenreich-May, and Golda S. Ginsburg.

Their work has been published most often in the following venues:

  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health
  • UNC Libraries

Amanda Jensen-Doss's contributions explore the integration of measurement-based care tools to improve clinical outcomes and organizational processes within youth mental health services. Their research supports advancing health policy implementation and improving access to mental health treatment for younger populations.

Best Publications

  • What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice.

    John R. Weisz;Sofie Kuppens;Mei Yi Ng;Dikla Eckshtain

  • Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons.

    John R. Weisz;Amanda Jensen-Doss;Kristin M. Hawley

  • Performance of evidence-based youth psychotherapies compared with usual clinical care: a multilevel meta-analysis.

    John R. Weisz;Sofie Kuppens;Dikla Eckshtain;Ana M. Ugueto

  • Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy versus Usual Clinical Care for Youth Depression: An Initial Test of Transportability to Community Clinics and Clinicians.

    John R. Weisz;Michael A. Southam-Gerow;Elana B. Gordis;Jennifer K. Connor-Smith

  • Understanding Barriers to Evidence-Based Assessment: Clinician Attitudes Toward Standardized Assessment Tools

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Kristin M. Hawley

  • Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Emily M. Becker Haimes;Ashley M. Smith;Aaron R. Lyon

  • Diagnostic agreement predicts treatment process and outcomes in youth mental health clinics.

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;John R. Weisz

  • Using Evidence-Based Treatments: The Experiences of Youth Providers Working Under a Mandate

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Kristin M. Hawley;Molly A Lopez;Leticia Duvivier Osterberg

  • Initial Test of a Principle-Guided Approach to Transdiagnostic Psychotherapy With Children and Adolescents

    John Weisz;Sarah Kate Bearman;Lauren C. Santucci;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Clinical guide to the evidence-based assessment approach to diagnosis and treatment

    Eric Arden Youngstrom;Sophia Choukas-Bradley;Casey D. Calhoun;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Shared Decision-Making in Youth Mental Health Care: Using the Evidence to Plan Treatments Collaboratively.

    David A. Langer;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Understanding clinicians' diagnostic practices: Attitudes toward the utility of diagnosis and standardized diagnostic tools

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Kristin M. Hawley

  • Ethnicity as a moderator of how parents' attitudes and perceived stigma influence intentions to seek child mental health services.

    Erlanger A. Turner;Amanda Jensen-Doss;Robert W. Heffer

  • Who's using treatment manuals? A national survey of practicing therapists.

    Emily M. Becker;Ashley M. Smith;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Parent–youth informant disagreement: Implications for youth anxiety treatment:

    Emily M Becker-Haimes;Emily M Becker-Haimes;Amanda Jensen-Doss;Boris Birmaher;Philip C Kendall

  • Workshop-based Training in Trauma-focused CBT: An In-depth Analysis of Impact on Provider Practices

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Karen J. Cusack;Michael A. de Arellano

  • Computer-assisted therapies: examination of therapist-level barriers to their use.

    Emily M. Becker;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Do Noncontingent Incentives Increase Survey Response Rates among Mental Health Providers? A Randomized Trial Comparison

    Kristin M. Hawley;Jonathan R. Cook;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Predictors and moderators of agreement between clinical and research diagnoses for children and adolescents.

    Amanda Jensen-Doss;Eric A. Youngstrom;Jennifer Kogos Youngstrom;Norah C. Feeny

  • Evidence-Based Assessment Meets Evidence-Based Treatment: An Approach to Science-Informed Case Conceptualization

    Lillian M. Christon;Bryce D. McLeod;Amanda Jensen-Doss

  • Practice Involves More Than Treatment: How Can Evidence‐Based Assessment Catch Up to Evidence‐Based Treatment?

    Amanda Jensen-Doss

Frequent Co-Authors

John R. Weisz
John R. Weisz Harvard University
Bryce D. McLeod
Bryce D. McLeod Virginia Commonwealth University
Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente
Michael A. Southam-Gerow
Michael A. Southam-Gerow Virginia Commonwealth University
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Aaron Hogue
Aaron Hogue National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University
Aaron R. Lyon
Aaron R. Lyon University of Washington
Craig E. Henderson
Craig E. Henderson Sam Houston State University
Jill Ehrenreich-May
Jill Ehrenreich-May University of Miami
Golda S. Ginsburg
Golda S. Ginsburg University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online can be a flexible and cost-effective way to start your career. Many universities now offer fully accredited programs that allow students to study from anywhere, making higher education more accessible than ever. Choosing an affordable program also helps reduce student debt, which is a key concern for future graduates.

For those prioritizing affordability, there are plenty of options across the country. If you are based in New York, you can consider the cheapest online psychology master's programs in New York. Texas also offers a wealth of options, with affordable online psychology master's programs in Texas and affordable online psychology degrees in Texas for undergraduate and graduate students alike.

Students in Pennsylvania can explore the cheapest online psychology programs in Pennsylvania to start their journey in the field. Completing an online psychology degree opens doors to diverse career pathways, from counseling and research to human resources and social services. Evaluating these affordable options can make your dream of a psychology career more attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Jensen-Doss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles