World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
28570
World Ranking
9421
National Ranking
914

David Coggon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Coggon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 480 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David Coggon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Coggon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Coggon is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to workplace health, COVID-19, mental health, and occupational medicine.

Their recent research papers include:

  • Risks of COVID-19 by occupation in NHS workers in England, 2021, Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • Are depressive disorders caused by psychosocial stressors at work? A systematic review with metaanalysis, 2021, European Journal of Epidemiology
  • Assessment of workers' personal vulnerability to covid-19 using 'covid-age', 2020, Occupational Medicine
  • Consequences of ignoring clustering in linear regression, 2021, BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sickness absence for mental ill health in National Health Service staff, 2021, BMJ Open

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Paul Cullinan
  • Ira Madan
  • Vaughan Parsons
  • Georgia Ntani
  • Martie van Tongeren

David Coggon has published regularly in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Occupational Medicine
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • BMJ Open

Their main fields of study are Medicine and Health Professions. Within these, subfields include General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Oncology, Infectious Diseases, and Statistics and Probability.

Their research extensively covers these topics:

  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for the incidence and progression of radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

    Cyrus Cooper;Shelagh Snow;Timothy E. McAlindon;Samantha Kellingray

  • Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population

    Karen Walker-Bone;Keith T. Palmer;Isabel Reading;David Coggon

  • Manual handling activities and risk of low back pain in nurses.

    Julia Smedley;Peter Egger;Cyrus Cooper;David Coggon

  • Knee osteoarthritis and obesity.

    D. Coggon;I. Reading;P. Croft;M. McLaren

  • Inflammatory bowel disease and domestic hygiene in infancy

    A.E. Gent;M.D. Hellier;R.H. Grace;E.T. Swarbrick

  • Occupational physical activities and osteoarthritis of the knee

    David Coggon;Peter Croft;Samantha Kellingray;David Barrett

  • Individual Risk factors for Hip Osteoarthritis: Obesity, Hip Injury and Physical Activity

    C Cooper;H Inskip;P Croft;L Campbell

  • Occupational activity and osteoarthritis of the knee

    C Cooper;T McAlindon;D Coggon;P Egger

  • DEFINING OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES

    Peter Croft;Cyrus Cooper;Carol Wickham;David Coggon

  • Cancer Mortality in Workers Exposed to Phenoxy Herbicides, Chlorophenols, and Dioxins An Expanded and Updated International Cohort Study

    Manolis Kogevinas;Heiko Becher;Trevor Benn;Pier Alberto Bertazzi

  • Prospective cohort study of predictors of incident low back pain in nurses

    Julia Smedley;Peter Egger;Cyrus Cooper;David Coggon

  • Carpal tunnel syndrome and its relation to occupation: a systematic literature review

    Keith T. Palmer;E. Clare Harris;David Coggon

  • Low back pain in eight areas of Britain.

    K Walsh;M Cruddas;D Coggon

  • Risk of prematurity, low birthweight and pre-eclampsia in relation to working hours and physical activities: a systematic review

    Matteo Bonzini;David Coggon;Keith T Palmer

  • Risk factors for incident neck and shoulder pain in hospital nurses.

    Julia Smedley;Hazel Inskip;F. Trevelyan;P. Buckle

  • Smoking and musculoskeletal disorders: findings from a British national survey

    Keith T. Palmer;Holly Syddall;Cyrus Cooper;D. Coggon

  • Cancer mortality in workers exposed to chlorophenoxy herbicides and chlorophenols.

    R. Saracci;M. Kogevinas;R. Winkelmann;P.A. Bertazzi

  • Back pain in Britain: comparison of two prevalence surveys at an interval of 10 years

    Keith T Palmer;Kevin Walsh;Holly Bendall;Cyrus Cooper

  • Osteoarthritis of the hip: an occupational disease in farmers.

    P. Croft;D. Coggon;M. Cruddas;C. Cooper

  • Evaluation of work-related psychosocial factors and regional musculoskeletal pain: results from a EULAR Task Force

    G.J. Macfarlane;N. Pallewatte;P. Paudyal;F.M. Blyth

Frequent Co-Authors

Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Hazel Inskip
Hazel Inskip University of Southampton
Peter Croft
Peter Croft Keele University
Michael J. Griffin
Michael J. Griffin University of Southampton
Manolis Kogevinas
Manolis Kogevinas Pompeu Fabra University
Clive Osmond
Clive Osmond University of Southampton
Elsebeth Lynge
Elsebeth Lynge University of Copenhagen
Stephen T. Holgate
Stephen T. Holgate University of Southampton
Fernando G. Benavides
Fernando G. Benavides Pompeu Fabra University
Panos Bitsios
Panos Bitsios University of Crete

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities in the healthcare field, even if you’re not planning to become a physician. For students interested in health and wellness, nutrition degrees online offer flexible options for pursuing careers in dietetics, public health, or wellness coaching.

Accreditation is key when selecting a program. If you’re considering healthcare administration, it’s important to look for which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? Accredited MHA programs can help you qualify for leadership positions and are recognized by employers nationwide.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials, online rn to bsn programs without clinicals provide a convenient way to complete your degree without additional hands-on requirements. This pathway enables working professionals to achieve career growth while balancing existing commitments.

Those seeking the highest level of nursing practice may want to explore accelerated msn to dnp programs. These fast-track options are designed for experienced nurses who wish to move quickly into leadership, education, or clinical expert roles.

Best Scientists Citing David Coggon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles