World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 63 2533 2417 260 256 207 11452

Ren-Cun Jin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ren-Cun Jin between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ren-Cun Jin published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2020. 31 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2020. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 16 publications
2006 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ren-Cun Jin: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 2
2010 0
2011 1
2012 9
2013 14
2014 17
2015 14
2016 12
2017 14
2018 12
2019 21
2020 22
2021 22
2022 5
2023 4
2024 15
2025 16
Total 207
Download as CSV

Ren-Cun Jin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ren-Cun Jin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 207 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 207
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Ren-Cun Jin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ren-Cun Jin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150 63
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Ren-Cun Jin is affiliated with Hangzhou Normal University in China. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant body of work covering pollution, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, industrial and manufacturing engineering, water science and technology, and environmental engineering.

Their main research topics include:

  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Phosphorus and nutrient management

Ren-Cun Jin has contributed to numerous publications, particularly in the following venues:

  • Bioresource Technology
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Chemical Engineering Journal
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

A selection of recent papers includes:

  • "Deciphering the toxic effects of antibiotics on denitrification: Process performance, microbial community and antibiotic resistance genes" (2020), Journal of Environmental Management
  • "Role and application of quorum sensing in anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process: A review" (2020), Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology
  • "Advances and challenges of sulfur-driven autotrophic denitrification (SDAD) for nitrogen removal" (2020), Chinese Chemical Letters
  • "Phosphorus removal from diluted wastewaters using a La/C nanocomposite-doped membrane with adsorption-filtration dual functions" (2020), Chemical Engineering Journal
  • "A review on anammox process for the treatment of antibiotic-containing wastewater: Linking effects with corresponding mechanisms" (2020), Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

Frequent collaborators include Bao-Cheng Huang, Nian-Si Fan, Quan Zhang, Jia-Min Zhou, and Ying-Jun Sun.

Best Publications

  • The inhibition of the Anammox process: A review

    Unknown

  • The effect of nitrite inhibition on the anammox process.

    T. Lotti;W.R.L. van der Star;R. Kleerebezem;C. Lubello

  • The effect of sulfide inhibition on the ANAMMOX process.

    Ren-Cun Jin;Guang-Feng Yang;Qian-Qian Zhang;Chun Ma

  • Impacts of transient salinity shock loads on Anammox process performance.

    Chun Ma;Ren-Cun Jin;Guang-Feng Yang;Jin-Jin Yu

  • A critical review of antibiotic removal strategies: Performance and mechanisms

    Zheng-Yang Lu;Yuan-Long Ma;Jiang-Tao Zhang;Nian-Si Fan

  • Beyond an Applicable Rate in Low-Strength Wastewater Treatment by Anammox: Motivated Labor at an Extremely Short Hydraulic Retention Time.

    Unknown

  • Successful start-up of the anammox process: Influence of the seeding strategy on performance and granule properties.

    Hui Chen;Hai-Yan Hu;Qian-Qian Chen;Man-Ling Shi

  • Short-term impacts of Cu, CuO, ZnO and Ag nanoparticles (NPs) on anammox sludge: CuNPs make a difference.

    Zheng-Zhe Zhang;Jia-Jia Xu;Zhi-Jian Shi;Ya-Fei Cheng

  • Resistance genes and extracellular proteins relieve antibiotic stress on the anammox process.

    Nian-Si Fan;Jin-Jin Fu;Dong-Qi Huang;Yuan-Long Ma

  • Evidence for the Cooccurrence of Nitrite-Dependent Anaerobic Ammonium and Methane Oxidation Processes in a Flooded Paddy Field

    Li-dong Shen;Shuai Liu;Qian Huang;Xu Lian

  • Enhancement of anammox performance by Cu(II), Ni(II) and Fe(III) supplementation.

    Hui Chen;Jin-Jin Yu;Xiu-Ying Jia;Ren-Cun Jin

  • Performance of an Anammox UASB reactor at high load and low ambient temperature

    Ren-Cun Jin;Chun Ma;Jin-Jin Yu

  • Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of heavy metals on anammox activity: A batch test study.

    Zheng-Zhe Zhang;Qian-Qian Zhang;Jia-Jia Xu;Rui Deng

  • The effect of Cu(II) stress on the activity, performance and recovery on the Anaerobic Ammonium-Oxidizing (Anammox) process

    Guang-Feng Yang;Wei-Min Ni;Kai Wu;Hui Wang

  • Performance comparison of two anammox reactors: SBR and UBF

    Ren-Cun Jin;Ren-Cun Jin;Ping Zheng;An-Hui Hu;Qaisar Mahmood

  • Towards simultaneously removing nitrogen and sulfur by a novel process: Anammox and autotrophic desulfurization–denitrification (AADD)

    Qiong Guo;Hai-Yan Hu;Zhi-Jian Shi;Chen-Chen Yang

  • Inhibition of wastewater pollutants on the anammox process: A review.

    Dong-Qi Huang;Jin-Jin Fu;Zi-Yue Li;Nian-Si Fan

  • Changes in the nitrogen removal performance and the properties of granular sludge in an Anammox system under oxytetracycline (OTC) stress

    Guang-Feng Yang;Qian-Qian Zhang;Ren-Cun Jin

  • Enrichment of anammox bacteria from three sludge sources for the startup of monosodium glutamate industrial wastewater treatment system.

    Li-dong Shen;An-hui Hu;Ren-cun Jin;Dong-qing Cheng

  • Long-term effects of oxytetracycline (OTC) on the granule-based anammox: Process performance and occurrence of antibiotic resistance genes

    Zhi-Jian Shi;Hai-Yan Hu;Yang-Yang Shen;Jia-Jia Xu

  • Kinetics of nitrogen removal in high rate anammox upflow filter

    Ren-Cun Jin;Ping Zheng

  • The joint inhibitory effects of phenol, copper (II), oxytetracycline (OTC) and sulfide on Anammox activity

    Guang-Feng Yang;Ren-Cun Jin

  • Anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria gain antibiotic resistance during long-term acclimatization

    Zheng-Zhe Zhang;Qian-Qian Zhang;Qiong Guo;Qian-Qian Chen

  • Behavior and fate of copper ions in an anammox granular sludge reactor and strategies for remediation.

    Zheng-Zhe Zhang;Rui Deng;Ya-Fei Cheng;Yu-Huang Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Ping Zheng
Ping Zheng Zhejiang University
Baolan Hu
Baolan Hu Zhejiang University
Min Yang
Min Yang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Qaisar Mahmood
Qaisar Mahmood University of Bahrain
Peiyue Li
Peiyue Li Chang'an University
Liping Lou
Liping Lou Zhejiang University
Hui Qian
Hui Qian Chang'an University
Han-Qing Yu
Han-Qing Yu University of Science and Technology of China
Tang Chongjian
Tang Chongjian Central South University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many universities now offer affordable options, such as online general studies bachelor degree cheap programs, which provide a flexible foundation for further specialization.

If you’re seeking a straightforward entry into environmental fields, consider some of the easiest bachelor's degree programs available online. These can help you build essential skills without overwhelming workloads, making them ideal for balancing work and study.

For those focused on earth sciences, pursuing a geologist degree online is a strategic choice. This specialized path equips students with knowledge about the planet’s physical structure, essential for environmental assessment and resource management careers.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is a rapidly growing field closely tied to environmental studies. Attending one of the best GIS undergraduate programs online can prepare you to analyze spatial data and contribute to sustainable planning and conservation efforts.

By understanding these related degrees, students can tailor their education to match career goals in environmental science and allied industries.

Best Scientists Citing Ren-Cun Jin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles