World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 39 4168 3897 148 144 96 5658

Guido Lingua publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guido Lingua between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guido Lingua published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2008. 7 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2008. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 2 publications
1998 2025

104 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guido Lingua: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 7
2006 7
2007 8
2008 12
2009 7
2010 6
2011 2
2012 4
2013 3
2014 4
2015 3
2016 2
2017 2
2018 4
2019 0
2020 7
2021 7
2022 1
2023 0
2024 5
2025 2
Total 104
Download as CSV

Guido Lingua publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Lingua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 96–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 96 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226 96
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Guido Lingua D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guido Lingua sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229 39
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • DNA

Guido Lingua mainly focuses on Botany, Mycorrhiza, Glomeromycota, Phytoremediation and Glomus. His Mycorrhiza research is classified as research in Symbiosis. His research investigates the link between Glomeromycota and topics such as Pseudomonas putida that cross with problems in Germination, Plant morphology, Pseudomonadaceae and Pseudomonadales.

The concepts of his Phytoremediation study are interwoven with issues in Soil contamination and Bioremediation. His Soil contamination course of study focuses on Microbial metabolism and Agronomy. His Glomus research integrates issues from Basilicum, Essential oil, Linalool, Ocimum and Trichome.

His most cited work include:

  • Effects of three AM fungi on growth, distribution of glandular hairs, and essential oil production in Ocimum basilicum L. var. Genovese (247 citations)
  • Beneficial role of plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant responses to heavy metal stress. (158 citations)
  • Beneficial role of plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant responses to heavy metal stress. (158 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Botany, Horticulture, Glomus, Inoculation and Symbiosis. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Phytoremediation and Mycorrhiza. He has researched Phytoremediation in several fields, including Soil contamination, Plant growth, Agronomy, Cutting and Glomeromycota.

The study incorporates disciplines such as Arbuscular mycorrhiza and Solanaceae in addition to Mycorrhiza. The Horticulture study which covers Microorganism that intersects with Human fertilization. His Glomus study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Basilicum, Essential oil, Ocimum and Secondary metabolism.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (60.00%)
  • Horticulture (24.00%)
  • Glomus (21.33%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Horticulture (24.00%)
  • Vineyard (5.33%)
  • Crop (5.33%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Horticulture, Vineyard, Crop, Inoculation and Rhizosphere. The various areas that Guido Lingua examines in his Horticulture study include Pest control and Phenology. His Vineyard research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Glomus, Glomeraceae, Bacteriome and Integrated pest management.

He has included themes like Pseudomonas fluorescens, Fertilizer, Pesticide, Cucurbita pepo and Pseudomonas in his Inoculation study. His research in Rhizosphere intersects with topics in Agronomy and Soil salinity. His study in Agronomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Biomass and Rhizobacteria.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Saline and Arid Soils: Impact on Bacteria, Plants, and their Interaction. (8 citations)
  • Selected autochthonous rhizobia, applied in combination with AM fungi, improve seed quality of common bean cultivated in reduced fertilization condition (6 citations)
  • Screening of Bacterial Endophytes Able to Promote Plant Growth and Increase Salinity Tolerance (5 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • DNA

Guido Lingua mainly investigates Crop, Horticulture, Biomass, Antibiotic resistance and Sorghum. His studies in Crop integrate themes in fields like Rhizobia, Inoculation, Rhizobium and Root nodule. His Horticulture study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Symbiosis.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Pseudomonas brassicacearum and 16S ribosomal RNA.

Best Publications

  • Effects of three AM fungi on growth, distribution of glandular hairs, and essential oil production in Ocimum basilicum L. var. Genovese

    Andrea Copetta;Guido Lingua;Graziella Berta

  • Beneficial role of plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant responses to heavy metal stress.

    Elisa GamaleroE. Gamalero;Elisa GamaleroE. Gamalero;Guido LinguaG. Lingua;Guido LinguaG. Lingua;Graziella BertaG. Berta;Graziella BertaG. Berta;Bernard R. GlickB.R. Glick;Bernard R. GlickB.R. Glick

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads improve yield, quality and nutritional value of tomato: a field study.

    Elisa Bona;Simone Cantamessa;Nadia Massa;Paola Manassero

  • Do interactions between plant roots and the rhizosphere affect parasitoid behaviour

    Emilio Guerrieri;Guido Lingua;Maria Cristina Digilio;Nadia Massa

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi differentially affect the response to high zinc concentrations of two registered poplar clones.

    Guido Lingua;Cinzia Franchin;Valeria Todeschini;Stefano Castiglione

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi restore normal growth in a white poplar clone grown on heavy metal-contaminated soil, and this is associated with upregulation of foliar metallothionein and polyamine biosynthetic gene expression.

    Angela Cicatelli;Guido Lingua;Valeria Todeschini;Stefania Biondi

  • AM fungi and PGP pseudomonads increase flowering, fruit production, and vitamin content in strawberry grown at low nitrogen and phosphorus levels

    Elisa Bona;Guido Lingua;Paola Manassero;Simone Cantamessa

  • Interactions between Pseudomonas putida UW4 and Gigaspora rosea BEG9 and their consequences for the growth of cucumber under salt-stress conditions.

    E. Gamalero;G. Berta;N. Massa;B.R. Glick

  • High zinc concentrations reduce rooting capacity and alter metallothionein gene expression in white poplar (Populus alba L. cv. Villafranca).

    Stefano Castiglione;Cinzia Franchin;Tiziana Fossati;Guido Lingua

  • Mycorrhiza-induced differential response to a yellows disease in tomato

    Guido Lingua;Giovanni D'Agostino;Nadia Massa;Michele Antosiano

  • Synergistic interactions between the ACC deaminase-producing bacterium Pseudomonas putida UW4 and the AM fungus Gigaspora rosea positively affect cucumber plant growth.

    Elisa Gamalero;Graziella Berta;Nadia Massa;Bernard R. Glick

  • Effects of high zinc concentration on poplar leaves: A morphological and biochemical study

    V. Todeschini;G. Lingua;G. D’Agostino;F. Carniato

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth-promoting pseudomonads increases anthocyanin concentration in strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa var. Selva) in conditions of reduced fertilization.

    Guido Lingua;Elisa Bona;Paola Manassero;Francesco Marsano

  • Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Strawberry Growth, Fruit Production, Nutritional Quality, and Volatilome.

    Valeria Todeschini;Nassima AitLahmidi;Eleonora Mazzucco;Francesco Marsano

  • Clonal differences in survival capacity, copper and zinc accumulation, and correlation with leaf polyamine levels in poplar: a large-scale field trial on heavily polluted soil.

    S. Castiglione;V. Todeschini;Cinzia Franchin;Patrizia Torrigiani

  • Tomato below ground-above ground interactions: Trichoderma longibrachiatum affects the performance of Macrosiphum euphorbiae and its natural antagonists.

    Donatella Battaglia;Simone Bossi;Pasquale Cascone;Maria Cristina Digilio

  • Expression of the PsMTA1 gene in white poplar engineered with the MAT system is associated with heavy metal tolerance and protection against 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine mediated-DNA damage

    Alma Balestrazzi;Silvia Botti;Samantha Zelasco;Stefania Biondi

  • Preferential Colonization of Solanum tuberosum L. Roots by the Fungus Glomus intraradices in Arable Soil of a Potato Farming Area

    Patrizia Cesaro;Diederik van Tuinen;Andrea Copetta;Odile Chatagnier

  • Colonization pattern of primary tomato roots by Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI characterized by dilution plating, flow cytometry, fluorescence, confocal and scanning electron microscopy

    Elisa Gamalero;Guido Lingua;Flavia Giusy Caprì;Anna Fusconi

  • Saline and Arid Soils: Impact on Bacteria, Plants, and their Interaction.

    Elisa Gamalero;Elisa Bona;Valeria Todeschini;Guido Lingua

  • Effects of Heavy Metals and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza on the Leaf Proteome of a Selected Poplar Clone: A Time Course Analysis

    Guido Lingua;Elisa Bona;Valeria Todeschini;Chiara Cattaneo

Frequent Co-Authors

Graziella Berta
Graziella Berta University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Patrizia Torrigiani
Patrizia Torrigiani University of Bologna
Stefania Biondi
Stefania Biondi University of Bologna
Bernard R. Glick
Bernard R. Glick University of Waterloo
Daniel Wipf
Daniel Wipf Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Emilio Marengo
Emilio Marengo University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Alma Balestrazzi
Alma Balestrazzi University of Pavia
Philippe Lemanceau
Philippe Lemanceau INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Domenico Osella
Domenico Osella University of Eastern Piedmont Amadeo Avogadro
Maria Cristina Digilio
Maria Cristina Digilio University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Guido Lingua

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles