World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
42
Citations
8906
World Ranking
3390
National Ranking
126

Daniel Wipf publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Wipf sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 130 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Daniel Wipf D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Wipf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Agroecology: the key role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in ecosystem services.

    Silvio Gianinazzi;Armelle Gollotte;Marie-Noëlle Binet;Diederik van Tuinen

  • The Selaginella genome identifies genetic changes associated with the evolution of vascular plants.

    Jo Ann Banks;Tomoaki Nishiyama;Mitsuyasu Hasebe;Mitsuyasu Hasebe;John L. Bowman;John L. Bowman

  • TRANSPORT MECHANISMS FOR ORGANIC FORMS OF CARBON AND NITROGEN BETWEEN SOURCE AND SINK

    Sylvie Lalonde;Daniel Wipf;Wolf B. Frommer

  • Trading on the arbuscular mycorrhiza market: from arbuscules to common mycorrhizal networks

    Daniel Wipf;Franziska Krajinski;Diederik van Tuinen;Ghislaine Recorbet

  • Sugar transporters in plants and in their interactions with fungi

    Joan Doidy;Emily Grace;Christina Kühn;Françoise Simon-Plas

  • Conservation of amino acid transporters in fungi, plants and animals.

    Daniel Wipf;Uwe Ludewig;Mechthild Tegeder;Doris Rentsch

  • Occurrence, structure, and evolution of nitric oxide synthase–like proteins in the plant kingdom

    Sylvain Jeandroz;Daniel Wipf;Dennis J. Stuehr;Lorenzo Lamattina

  • AtIREG2 Encodes a Tonoplast Transport Protein Involved in Iron-dependent Nickel Detoxification in Arabidopsis thaliana Roots

    Gabriel Schaaf;Annegret Honsbein;Anderson R. Meda;Silvia Kirchner

  • Take a Trip Through the Plant and Fungal Transportome of Mycorrhiza

    Kevin Garcia;Joan Doidy;Sabine D. Zimmermann;Daniel Wipf

  • Arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis in viticulture: a review

    Sophie Trouvelot;Laurent Bonneau;Dirk Redecker;Diederik van Tuinen

  • Biotrophic transportome in mutualistic plant-fungal interactions.

    Leonardo Casieri;Nassima Ait Lahmidi;Joan Doidy;Claire Veneault-Fourrey

  • Characterization of a carbohydrate transporter from symbiotic glomeromycotan fungi

    Arthur Schüssler;Holger Martin;David Cohen;Michael Fitz

  • Combined phosphate and nitrogen limitation generates a nutrient stress transcriptome favorable for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in Medicago truncatula

    Laurent Bonneau;Stéphanie Huguet;Daniel Wipf;Nicolas Pauly

  • The family of ammonium transporters (AMT) in Sorghum bicolor: two AMT members are induced locally, but not systemically in roots colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    Sally Koegel;Nassima Ait Lahmidi;Christine Arnould;Odile Chatagnier

  • Inorganic Nitrogen Uptake and Transport in Beneficial Plant Root-Microbe Interactions

    Pierre Emmanuel Courty;Penelope Smith;Sally Koegel;Dirk Redecker

  • Impact of Beneficial Microorganisms on Strawberry Growth, Fruit Production, Nutritional Quality, and Volatilome.

    Valeria Todeschini;Nassima AitLahmidi;Eleonora Mazzucco;Francesco Marsano

  • Characterization of an Amino Acid Permease from the Endomycorrhizal Fungus Glomus mosseae

    Gilda Cappellazzo;Luisa Lanfranco;Michael Fitz;Daniel Wipf

  • RhizoTubes as a new tool for high throughput imaging of plant root development and architecture: test, comparison with pot grown plants and validation

    Christian Jeudy;Marielle Adrian;Christophe Baussard;Céline Bernard

  • Pezizomycetes genomes reveal the molecular basis of ectomycorrhizal truffle lifestyle

    Claude Murat;Thibaut Payen;Benjamin Noel;Alan Kuo

  • Understanding and managing soil biodiversity: a major challenge in agroecology

    Philippe Lemanceau;Pierre-Alain Maron;Sylvie Mazurier;Christophe Mougel

  • An update on nutrient transport processes in ectomycorrhizas

    Michel Chalot;Arnaud Javelle;Damien Blaudez;Raphaël Lambilliote

  • Arbuscular mycorrhiza: studies on the geosiphon symbiosis lead to the characterization of the first glomeromycotan sugar transporter.

    Arthur Schüßler;Holger Martin;David Cohen;Michael Fitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre-Emmanuel Courty
Pierre-Emmanuel Courty INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Wolf B. Frommer
Wolf B. Frommer Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Eliane Dumas-Gaudot
Eliane Dumas-Gaudot Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
François Buscot
François Buscot Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Michel Chalot
Michel Chalot University of Franche-Comté
Claude Murat
Claude Murat University of Lorraine
Thomas Boller
Thomas Boller University of Basel
Francis Martin
Francis Martin University of Lorraine
Meghan L. Avolio
Meghan L. Avolio Johns Hopkins University
Igor V. Grigoriev
Igor V. Grigoriev Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Wipf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles