World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
45
Citations
20536
World Ranking
1412
National Ranking
623

Dana Scott publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Scott sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 141 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Dana Scott D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana Scott sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the American Mathematical Society
  • 1994 - ACM Fellow For their joint paper 'Finite Automataand Their Decision Problem,' which introduced the idea of nondeterministic machines, which has proved to be an enormously valuable concept. Their (Scott & Rabin) classic paper has been a continuous source of inspiration for subsequent work in this field.
  • 1992 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1988 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1978 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 1976 - A. M. Turing Award Along with Michael O. Rabin, for their joint paper "Finite Automata and Their Decision Problem," which introduced the idea of nondeterministic machines, which has proved to be an enormously valuable concept. Their (Scott & Rabin) classic paper has been a continuous source of inspiration for subsequent work in this field.
  • 1972 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1964 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Dana Scott is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, in the United States. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their work also touches on Emergency Medical Services, Research and Theory, Sociology and Political Science, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The research topics Dana Scott has contributed to include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Nursing education and management
  • Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Semigroups and automata theory

Recent publications by Dana Scott cover a range of interdisciplinary subjects. These papers include:

  • "Computer-Supported Exploration of a Categorical Axiomatization of Modeloids," 2020, Lecture notes in computer science
  • "Notes on Gödel's and Scott's variants of the ontological argument," 2025, Monatshefte für Mathematik
  • "Articulating pathways for a diverse nursing workforce in a community college," 2023, Teaching and learning in nursing
  • "Interpreting Lambda Calculus in Domain-Valued Random Variables," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Category Theory in Isabelle/HOL as a Basis for Meta-logical Investigation," 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Dana Scott has published in several venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Monatshefte für Mathematik
  • Teaching and learning in nursing
  • Lecture notes in computer science
  • Assessment Update

Their research collaborations involve multiple coauthors, notably:

  • Christoph Benzmüller
  • Jonas Bayer
  • Patricia Allen
  • Rita Krummen
  • Mandi Mauck

Dana Scott has been recognized with several awards and honors over their career, including:

  • Fellow of the American Mathematical Society (2013)
  • ACM Fellow (1994) for the joint paper that introduced nondeterministic machines
  • Member of Academia Europaea (1992)
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (1988)
  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation (1978)
  • A. M. Turing Award (1976) alongside Michael O. Rabin for a classic paper on finite automata and nondeterministic machines
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1972)
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1964)

Best Publications

  • Finite automata and their decision problems

    M. O. Rabin;D. Scott

  • Continuous Lattices and Domains

    G. Gierz;K. H. Hofmann;K. Keimel;J. D. Lawson

  • A Compendium of Continuous Lattices

    Gerhard Gierz;Karl Heinrich Hofmann;Klaus Keimel;Jimmie D. Lawson

  • Data Types as Lattices

    Dana S. Scott

  • Domains for Denotational Semantics

    Dana S. Scott

  • Outline of a Mathematical Theory of Computation

    Dana Scott

  • Toward a mathematical semantics for computer languages

    Dana Scott;Christopher Strachey

  • Foundational aspects of theories of measurement

    Dana S. Scott;Patrick Suppes

  • Measurement structures and linear inequalities

    Dana Scott

  • The lattice of flow diagrams

    Dana S. Scott

  • Sheaves and logic

    M. P. Fourman;D. S. Scott

  • A type-theoretical alternative to ISWIM, CUCH, OWHY

    Dana S. Scott

  • An Introduction to Modal Logic

    E. J. Lemmon;Dana Scott;Krister Segerberg

  • Completeness and Axiomatizability in Many-Valued Logic

    Dana Scott

  • Lectures on a Mathematical Theory of Computation

    Dana S. Scott

  • Identity and existence in intuitionistic logic

    Dana Scott

  • Measurable Cardinals and Constructible Sets

    Dana Scott

  • LOGIC WITH DENUMERABLY LONG FORMULAS AND FINITE STRINGS OF QUANTIFIERS

    Dana Scott;Dana Scott

  • Reduced Direct Products

    T. Frayne;A. C. Morel;D. S. Scott

  • Assigning Probabilities to Logical Formulas

    Dana Scott;Peter Krauss

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Birkedal
Lars Birkedal Aarhus University
Gordon Plotkin
Gordon Plotkin University of Edinburgh
Carl A. Gunter
Carl A. Gunter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania
Allen Newell
Allen Newell Carnegie Mellon University
Benjamin C. Pierce
Benjamin C. Pierce University of Pennsylvania
Ugo Montanari
Ugo Montanari University of Pisa
Glynn Winskel
Glynn Winskel University of Cambridge
Patrick Suppes
Patrick Suppes Stanford University
Gilbert Harman
Gilbert Harman Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students complement mathematical skills with specialized knowledge through online degrees. For those interested in blending quantitative analysis with business, exploring marketing masters can be a strategic choice, offering insights into data-driven market strategies and boosting earning potential.

Additionally, aspiring professionals aiming for leadership roles often pursue accelerated business education options like 1 year MBA programs in USA. These intensive programs provide essential management skills in a condensed timeframe, ideal for math graduates looking to fast-track their careers.

Many online MBA programs are flexible with credits, allowing students to leverage prior coursework. Understanding policies about can you transfer MBA credits can save time and reduce costs, making advanced degrees more accessible.

For those focused on data and analytics, pursuing specialized data analysis programs aligns closely with mathematical foundations and meets growing industry demand. These programs equip students with practical skills in big data and predictive modeling, enhancing job prospects in tech, finance, and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Dana Scott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles