World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
79
Citations
124975
World Ranking
1106
National Ranking
589

Allen Newell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen Newell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 223 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Allen Newell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Allen Newell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Allen Newell is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their academic career is connected with this institution, which is known for its contributions to computer science and related fields.

No recent papers are listed for Allen Newell, and there is limited public data on specific publication venues or frequent collaborators associated with them.

There is no available information on the main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work connected to Allen Newell in the current dataset.

Information regarding book publications or awards attributed to Allen Newell is also not provided in the data.

The profile reflects an emphasis on factual data as provided, focusing strictly on verifiable academic affiliations and available publication records.

Best Publications

  • Human Problem Solving

    Allen Newell

  • Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970.

    Herbert A. Simon;Allen Newell

  • Human Problem Solving.

    Nick Axten;Allen Newell;Herbert A. Simon

  • The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction

    Stuart K. Card;Allen Newell;Thomas P. Moran

  • Computer science as empirical inquiry symbols and search

    Allen Newell;Herbert A. Simon

  • The psychology of human-computer interaction

    Unknown

  • Soar: an architecture for general intelligence

    J. E. Laird;A. Newell;P. S. Rosenbloom

  • The knowledge level

    Allen Newell

  • Elements of a theory of human problem solving.

    Allen Newell;J. C. Shaw;Herbert A. Simon

  • Physical Symbol Systems

    Allen Newell

  • The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems

    Stuart K. Card;Thomas P. Moran;Allen Newell

  • You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium

    Allen Newell

  • The Processes of Creative Thinking

    Allen Newell;J. C. Shaw;Herbert Alexander Simon

  • Production Systems: Models of Control Structures

    Allen Newell

  • Report on a general problem-solving program.

    Allen Newell;J. C. Shaw;Herbert A. Simon

  • The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems

    Stuart K. Card;Thomas P. Moran;Allen Newell

  • GPS, a program that simulates human thought

    Allen Newell;Herbert A. Simon

  • Heuristic Problem Solving: The Next Advance in Operations Research

    Herbert A. Simon;Allen Newell

  • GPS : a case study in generality and problem solving

    George W Ernst;Allen Newell

  • Computer Structures: Readings and Examples,

    C. Gordon Bell;Allen Newell

  • Computer Science as Empirical Enquiry : Symbols and Search.

    Allen Newell;Herbert A. Simon

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul S. Rosenbloom
Paul S. Rosenbloom University of Southern California
Herbert A. Simon
Herbert A. Simon Carnegie Mellon University
John E. Laird
John E. Laird University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Thomas P. Moran
Thomas P. Moran IBM (United States)
Stuart K. Card
Stuart K. Card Stanford University
Milind Tambe
Milind Tambe Harvard University
Bonnie E. John
Bonnie E. John IBM (United States)
George G. Robertson
George G. Robertson Microsoft (United States)
Thad A. Polk
Thad A. Polk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard L. Lewis
Richard L. Lewis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways in Computer Science goes beyond traditional on-campus degrees. Online education now offers flexibility and accessibility for students of all backgrounds. Prospective students can start their journey with online associate degree programs, providing a foundational knowledge base that can lead to entry-level tech roles or the option to transfer credits toward a bachelor’s program.

Affordability is often a key concern, and choosing from the cheapest online college options allows students to receive a quality education while managing costs. Those wondering “what masters program should I do” will find that advanced degrees in areas like data science and artificial intelligence remain highly valued in the workforce and can lead to specialized, high-demand careers.

For students concerned about previous academic performance, there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 GPA, making further education more accessible than ever. No matter your starting point, online programs open doors to a wide variety of rewarding computer science and tech career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Allen Newell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles