World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
16590
World Ranking
6308
National Ranking
2819

David E. Kieras publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Kieras sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 128 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David E. Kieras D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Kieras sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Kieras is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic profile is characterized by a focus on cognitive science and human factors, although specific details about their fields of study, topics, and published works are not provided.

No records of recent papers or frequent co-authors are available in the provided data. Likewise, there is no information on publication venues, book publications, or awards associated with this researcher.

This profile thus reflects the current accessible information, highlighting the institutional connection without further detail on research contributions or collaborative efforts.

Best Publications

  • A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance : Part 1. Basic mechanisms

    David E. Meyer;David E. Kieras

  • A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena.

    David E. Meyer;David E. Kieras

  • The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast

    Bonnie E. John;David E. Kieras

  • An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction

    David E. Kieras;David E. Meyer

  • The role of a mental model in learning to operate a device

    David E. Kieras;Susan Bovair

  • An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity

    David Kieras;Peter G. Polson

  • Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck

    Eric H. Schumacher;Travis L. Seymour;Jennifer M. Glass;David E. Fencsik

  • An Approach to the Formal Analysis of User Complexity

    Unknown

  • Using GOMS for user interface design and evaluation: which technique?

    Bonnie E. John;David E. Kieras

  • Towards a Practical GOMS Model Methodology for User Interface Design

    David E. Kieras

  • Beyond pictures and words: Alternative information-processing models for imagery effect in verbal memory

    David Kieras

  • The acquisition and performance of text-editing skill: a cognitive complexity analysis

    Susan Bovair;David E. Kieras;Peter G. Polson

  • The acquisition of procedures from text: A production-system analysis of transfer of training

    David E Kieras;Susan Bovair

  • A Guide to Propositional Analysis for Research on Technical Prose.

    Susan Bovair;David E Kieras

  • Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recal

    David E. Kieras

  • Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose.

    David E Kieras

  • A Guide to GOMS Model Usability Evaluation using NGOMSL

    David Kieras

  • Predictive engineering models based on the EPIC architecture for a multimodal high-performance human-computer interaction task

    David E. Kieras;Scott D. Wood;David E. Meyer

  • Using the Keystroke-Level Model to Estimate Execution Times

    David Kieras

  • Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages

    David E. Kieras

  • Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling.

    Eric H. Schumacher;Erick J. Lauber;Jennifer M. Glass;Eileen L. Zurbriggen

  • Précis to a practical unified theory of cognition and action: Some lessons from EPIC computational models of human multiple-task performance

    David E. Meyer;David E. Kieras

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Meyer
David E. Meyer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Bonnie E. John
Bonnie E. John IBM (United States)
Jennifer M. Glass
Jennifer M. Glass University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Eric H. Schumacher
Eric H. Schumacher Georgia Institute of Technology
Michael D. Byrne
Michael D. Byrne Rice University
Jean Scholtz
Jean Scholtz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Marcel Adam Just
Marcel Adam Just Carnegie Mellon University
Patricia A. Carpenter
Patricia A. Carpenter Carnegie Mellon University
John R. Anderson
John R. Anderson Carnegie Mellon University
James G. Greeno
James G. Greeno University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career options. Specializations like cybersecurity, construction management, criminal justice, and accounting all offer affordable online study paths.

For those interested in information security, an online cybersecurity degree combines technical expertise and high job demand, especially as data threats grow. Alternatively, a cheapest online construction management degree can lead to roles managing technology and workflows in a vital industry.

If you are intrigued by law enforcement with a digital focus, a criminal justice online degree merges technology with legal systems. For those with a talent for numbers and data, a cheap online accounting degree provides flexible routes into finance, analytics, and forensic accounting.

Each of these affordable online degrees can help you build a specialized career, often from anywhere, and many complement the skills gained in computer science programs.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Kieras

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles