World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
7620
World Ranking
11499
National Ranking
4726

Jean Scholtz publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Scholtz sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 197 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jean Scholtz D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean Scholtz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jean Scholtz is affiliated with the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans several aspects of medicine, with a particular focus on social psychology, emergency medicine, surgery, reproductive medicine, and plant science.

Scholtz's published works include contributions to topics related to human-automation interaction and safety, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, healthcare technology and patient monitoring, sperm and testicular function, seed germination and physiology, as well as reproductive biology and fertility.

The recent papers associated with Scholtz reflect a diverse research portfolio. One notable paper, published in 2023, is titled Human-Robot Teaming Challenges for the Military and First Response, appearing in the Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems. Another publication from 2025 is Short communication: Impact of rest intervals and habituation on electro-ejaculated semen quality in merino-type rams, featured in the South African Journal of Animal Science.

Scholtz frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Julie A. Adams
  • Albert Sciarretta
  • H.A. O'Neill
  • Lars Krüger
  • A. Maqhashu

Their work is published primarily through venues such as:

  • Annual Review of Control Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • South African Journal of Animal Science

Best Publications

  • Common metrics for human-robot interaction

    Aaron Steinfeld;Terrence Fong;David Kaber;Michael Lewis

  • Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions

    J. Scholtz

  • Awareness in human-robot interactions

    J.L. Drury;J. Scholtz;H.A. Yanco

  • Collaborative visualization: definition, challenges, and research agenda

    Petra Isenberg;Niklas Elmqvist;Jean Scholtz;Daniel Cernea

  • Beyond usability evaluation: analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition

    Holly A. Yanco;Jill L. Drury;Jean Scholtz

  • Toward a framework for evaluating ubiquitous computing applications

    J. Scholtz;S. Consolvo

  • Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue

    J. Scholtz;J. Young;J.L. Drury;H.A. Yanco

  • AAAI-2002 fall symposium series

    Yukio Ohsawa;Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons;Christopher A. Miller

  • Final report for the DARPA/NSF interdisciplinary study on human-robot interaction

    J.L. Burke;R.R. Murphy;E. Rogers;V.J. Lumelsky

  • How do visual explanations foster end users' appropriate trust in machine learning?

    Fumeng Yang;Zhuanyi Huang;Jean Scholtz;Dustin L. Arendt

  • Mental representations of programs by novices and experts

    Vikki Fix;Susan Wiedenbeck;Jean Scholtz

  • Engineering ethnography in the home

    Michael Mateas;Tony Salvador;Jean Scholtz;Doug Sorensen

  • Human-Robot Interactions: Creating Synergistic Cyber Forces

    Jean C. Scholtz

  • Characteristics of the mental representations of novice and expert programmers: an empirical study

    Susan Wiedenbeck;Vikki Fix;Jean Scholtz

  • Beyond Usability: Evaluation Aspects of Visual Analytic Environments

    J. Scholtz

  • The Denver model for groupware design

    Tony Salvador;Jean Scholtz;James Larson

  • Developing Usability Tools and Techniques for Designing and Testing Web Sites

    Jean C. Scholtz;Sharon J. Laskowski;L L. Downey

  • Learning second and subsequent programming languages: A problem of transfer

    Jean Scholtz;Susan Wiedenbeck

  • The Roles Beacons Play in Comprehension for Novice and Expert Programmers.

    Martha E. Crosby;Jean Scholtz;Susan Wiedenbeck

  • VISVIP: 3D visualization of paths through web sites

    J. Cugini;J. Scholtz

  • Common metrics for human-robot interaction

    T. Fong;D. Kaber;M. Lewis;J. Scholtz

Frequent Co-Authors

Susan Wiedenbeck
Susan Wiedenbeck Drexel University
Holly A. Yanco
Holly A. Yanco University of Massachusetts Lowell
Catherine Plaisant
Catherine Plaisant University of Maryland, College Park
Georges Grinstein
Georges Grinstein University of Massachusetts Lowell
Alan C. Schultz
Alan C. Schultz United States Naval Research Laboratory
Ben Shneiderman
Ben Shneiderman University of Maryland, College Park
Terrence Fong
Terrence Fong Ames Research Center
Sunny Consolvo
Sunny Consolvo Google (United States)
Michael A. Goodrich
Michael A. Goodrich Brigham Young University
John Stasko
John Stasko Georgia Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in computer science but looking for flexible options, online education offers many accessible alternatives. From 1 year associate degree programs online, students can acquire essential technical skills and qualify for entry-level tech roles, making it a fast way to launch a career.

Those seeking greater advancement might explore some of the most useful graduate degrees in computer science and related fields, which are highly valued by employers. For students aiming to boost credentials quickly, the quickest masters degree online programs can be completed in as little as a year—ideal if you need to balance work and study.

Additionally, career changers and busy professionals can benefit from tech-focused certifications that pay well. These certifications help demonstrate expertise and can lead to high-paying roles without committing to a full degree program. Consider these various online pathways to find the best route for your career goals in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Jean Scholtz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles