World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
46472
World Ranking
4568
National Ranking
446

David I. Graham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David I. Graham sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 446 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David I. Graham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David I. Graham sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David I. Graham is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Engineering, with particular emphasis on Computational Mechanics, Ocean Engineering, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The main research topics addressed by Graham include:

  • Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
  • Wave and Wind Energy Systems
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Graham has contributed to various peer-reviewed journals in multiple disciplines. Frequent publication venues include:

  • British Journal of Cancer
  • International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Journal of the Operational Research Society
  • Physics of Fluids

Representative recent publications provide insight into the scope of their work:

  • "First results from five multidisciplinary diagnostic centre (MDC) projects for non-specific but concerning symptoms, possibly indicative of cancer" (2020, British Journal of Cancer)
  • "A Blind Comparative Study of Focused Wave Interactions with Floating Structures (CCP-WSI Blind Test Series 3)" (2020, International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering)
  • "Hydrodynamics of onshore oscillating water column devices: A numerical study using smoothed particle hydrodynamics" (2020, Ocean Engineering)
  • "An exact algorithm for small-cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation" (2020, Journal of the Operational Research Society)
  • "Modeling the effects of slip on dipole-wall collision problems using a lattice Boltzmann equation method" (2020, Physics of Fluids)

Graham collaborates with several co-authors across different research projects. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Deborah Greaves
  • T. Reis
  • Dave Chapman
  • V. Poirier
  • Daniel Vulkan

Best Publications

  • Diffuse axonal injury and traumatic coma in the primate

    T A Gennarelli;L E Thibault;J H Adams;D I Graham

  • Greenfield's Neuropathology

    Joseph Godwin Greenfield;David Ian Graham;Peter L Lantos

  • Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading.

    J H Adams;D Doyle;I Ford;T A Gennarelli

  • Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: an analysis of 45 cases.

    J. Hume Adams;D. I. Graham;Lilian S. Murray;Grace Scott

  • Glial‐Neuronal Interactions in Alzheimer's Disease: The Potential Role of a ‘Cytokine Cycle’ in Disease Progression

    W.S.T. Griffin;J.G. Sheng;J.G. Sheng;M.C. Royston;S.M. Gentleman

  • Beta amyloid protein deposition in the brain after severe head injury: implications for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

    G W Roberts;S M Gentleman;A Lynch;L Murray

  • Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele is associated with deposition of amyloid beta-protein following head injury.

    James A.R. Nicoll;Gareth W. Roberts;David I. Graham

  • Diffuse brain damage of immediate impact type. Its relationship to 'primary brain-stem damage' in head injury.

    J. Hume Adams;Dorothy E. Mitchell;D. I. Graham;David Doyle

  • βA4 amyloid protein deposition in brain after head trauma

    G.W. Roberts;S.M. Gentleman;A. Lynch;D.I. Graham

  • Ischaemic brain damage is still common in fatal non-missile head injury.

    D I Graham;I Ford;J H Adams;D Doyle

  • Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation.

    Hilaire J. Thompson;Jonathan Lifshitz;Jonathan Lifshitz;Niklas Marklund;M. Sean Grady

  • Ischaemic brain damage in fatal non-missile head injuries

    D.I. Graham;J.Hume Adams;David Doyle

  • Apoptosis After Traumatic Brain Injury

    Ramesh Raghupathi;David I. Graham;Tracy K. McINTOSH

  • Progressive Atrophy and Neuron Death for One Year Following Brain Trauma in the Rat

    Douglas H. Smith;Xiao-Han Chen;Jean E. S. Pierce;John A. Wolf

  • Association of interleukin-1 gene polymorphisms with Alzheimer's disease.

    James A. R. Nicoll;Robert E. Mrak;Robert E. Mrak;David I. Graham;Janice Stewart

  • Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?

    D M Morales;N Marklund;D Lebold;H J Thompson

  • Recent advances in neurotrauma.

    D. I. Graham;T. K. McIntosh;W. L. Maxwell;J. A. R. Nicoll

  • Effects of acutely induced hypertension in cats on pial arteriolar caliber, local cerebral blood flow, and the blood-brain barrier.

    E T MacKenzie;S Strandgaard;D I Graham;J V Jones

  • Brain damage in fatal non-missile head injury.

    J H Adams;D I Graham;G Scott;L S Parker

  • Multiple proteins implicated in neurodegenerative diseases accumulate in axons after brain trauma in humans.

    Kunihiro Uryu;Xiao-Han Chen;Dan Martinez;Kevin D. Browne

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. R. Nicoll
James A. R. Nicoll University of Southampton
Thomas A. Gennarelli
Thomas A. Gennarelli University of Pennsylvania
James McCulloch
James McCulloch University of Edinburgh
Tracy K. McIntosh
Tracy K. McIntosh Media NeuroConsultants
Ross Bullock
Ross Bullock University of Miami
Douglas H. Smith
Douglas H. Smith University of Pennsylvania
Graham M. Teasdale
Graham M. Teasdale University of Glasgow
Colin Smith
Colin Smith University of Edinburgh
John Q. Trojanowski
John Q. Trojanowski University of Pennsylvania
Karen Horsburgh
Karen Horsburgh University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens up various online options for related degrees and healthcare careers.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding schools online offer flexible study opportunities with financial aid, preparing students for essential support roles in hospitals and clinics.

If you’re looking to become a nurse but want to avoid standardized admission tests, consider nursing schools that don't require TEAS test. These schools streamline the application process and focus on core nursing skills.

Management-oriented students can explore a health care administration degree to build leadership and operational know-how for future roles in medical settings.

Nurses aiming to advance their clinical expertise may benefit from asn to np programs, which bridge the gap between an associate degree in nursing and nurse practitioner status through accelerated online pathways.

Exploring these related online degrees and pathways can help you find the right fit for your career goals in the evolving healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing David I. Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles