World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
24391
World Ranking
16129
National Ranking
1484

James McCulloch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

James McCulloch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James McCulloch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

James McCulloch is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile currently reflects a focus on research without publicly listed recent papers or frequent publication venues.

There are no records of recent papers authored by James McCulloch, nor information on frequent co-authors, indicating either early career status or limited public record of collaborative research outputs.

The scientist's documented research fields, subfields, and main topics of study are not available in the accessible data, leaving the precise thematic focus of their work unspecified.

Similarly, there are no noted book publications or awards linked to James McCulloch in the provided information.

The available data does not indicate any signs of the scientist being deceased, and their profile should be understood as current.

Best Publications

  • Focal cerebral ischaemia in the rat: 1. Description of technique and early neuropathological consequences following middle cerebral artery occlusion.

    A. Tamura;D. I. Graham;J. McCulloch;G. M. Teasdale

  • Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

    Lars Edvinsson;E. T. MacKenzie;J. McCulloch

  • The glutamate antagonist MK-801 reduces focal ischemic brain damage in the rat.

    C. K. Park;D. G. Nehls;D. I. Graham;G. M. Teasdale

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide: functional role in cerebrovascular regulation

    James McCulloch;Rolf Uddman;Tom A. Kingman;Lars Edvinsson

  • Protective effect of the glutamate antagonist, MK-801 in focal cerebral ischemia in the cat.

    E. Ozyurt;D. I. Graham;G. N. Woodruff;J. McCulloch

  • Innervation of the feline cerebral vasculature by nerve fibers containing calcitonin gene-related peptide: trigeminal origin and co-existence with substance P.

    Rolf Uddman;Lars Edvinsson;Rolf Ekman;Tom Kingman

  • Focal Cerebral Ischaemia in the Rat: 2. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Determined by [14C]Iodoantipyrine Autoradiography following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion

    A. Tamura;D. I. Graham;J. McCulloch;G. M. Teasdale

  • Quantitative assessment of early brain damage in a rat model of focal cerebral ischaemia.

    K A Osborne;T Shigeno;A M Balarsky;I Ford

  • Neuropeptide Y: cerebrovascular innervation and vasomotor effects in the cat.

    Lars Edvinsson;Piers Emson;James McCulloch;Kazuhiko Tatemoto

  • Correlation between amino acid release and neuropathologic outcome in rat brain following middle cerebral artery occlusion.

    Steven P. Butcher;Ross Bullock;David I. Graham;James McCulloch

  • Calcitonin gene-related peptide and cerebral blood vessels: distribution and vasomotor effects.

    L. Edvinsson;R. Ekman;I. Jansen;J. McCulloch

  • Focal Cerebral Ischaemia in the Cat: Treatment with the Glutamate Antagonist MK-801 After Induction of Ischaemia

    C. K. Park;D. G. Nehls;D. I. Graham;G. M. Teasdale

  • Endothelin-1-Induced Reductions in Cerebral Blood Flow: Dose Dependency, Time Course, and Neuropathological Consequences

    I. Mhairi Macrae;Michael J. Robinson;David I. Graham;John L. Reid

  • Substance P: immunohistochemical localization and effect upon cat pial arteries in vitro and in situ.

    L Edvinsson;J McCulloch;R Uddman

  • Effect of pretreatment with the calcium antagonist nimodipine on local cerebral blood flow and histopathology after middle cerebral artery occlusion.

    A. A. Mohamed;O. Gotoh;D. I. Graham;K. A. Osborne

  • Neuropeptide Y: Immunocytochemical localization to and effect upon feline pial arteries and veins in vitro and in situ

    Lars Edvinsson;Piers Emson;James McCULLOCH;Kazuhiko Tatemoto

  • Focal cerebral ischemia in the rat: topography of hemodynamic and histopathological changes.

    George W. Tyson;Graham M. Teasdale;Graham M. Teasdale;David I. Graham;James McCulloch

  • Nimodipine and the haemodynamic and histopathological consequences of middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat.

    Osamu Gotoh;Awni A. Mohamed;James McCulloch;David I. Graham

  • Acquired QT interval prolongation and HERG: implications for drug discovery and development.

    Keith Finlayson;Harry J. Witchel;James McCulloch;John Sharkey

  • Nerve fibers containing neuropeptide Y in the cerebrovascular bed: immunocytochemistry, radioimmunoassay, and vasomotor effects.

    L. Edvinsson;J. R. Copeland;P. C. Emson;J. McCulloch

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Edvinsson
Lars Edvinsson Lund University
Karen Horsburgh
Karen Horsburgh University of Edinburgh
David I. Graham
David I. Graham University of Glasgow
Ross Bullock
Ross Bullock University of Miami
Rolf Uddman
Rolf Uddman Malmö University
Michael J. O'Neill
Michael J. O'Neill Eli Lilly (United States)
Emma R. Wood
Emma R. Wood University of Edinburgh
Philip R. Holland
Philip R. Holland King's College London
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Daniela Montaldi
Daniela Montaldi University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Medicine in the USA, numerous related online degrees and career pathways can complement or expand your healthcare career. These programs offer flexibility for working students and professionals aiming to advance their expertise without relocating.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing one of the cheapest mha online programs can be a cost-effective way to earn a Master’s in Healthcare Administration. Nurses aiming for the highest levels of clinical practice can consider the best online dnp programs, which prepare graduates for advanced roles in nursing and healthcare leadership.

Pharmacy professionals seeking advancement may benefit from the flexibility of online pharmd programs, leading to a Doctor of Pharmacy degree. Meanwhile, those interested in the growing field of health information and data can start with an him associate degree online, which provides foundational skills for careers in health information management.

Exploring these options can open diverse pathways in healthcare, whether you’re aiming for clinical, administrative, or specialized support roles.

Best Scientists Citing James McCulloch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles