World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
9472
World Ranking
9256
National Ranking
684

Emma R. Wood publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma R. Wood sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 103 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Emma R. Wood D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emma R. Wood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emma R. Wood is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research contributions span multiple fields within neuroscience and related biological sciences.

The scientist's main fields of study include Neuroscience and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. These areas reflect a focus on understanding the molecular and cellular foundations of neural function and development.

Subfields of particular interest in their work are:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Genetics
  • Cell Biology
  • Social Psychology

Emma R. Wood's research covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Cellular transport and secretion

Their publication record features papers in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Autism, Journal of Academic Ophthalmology, Nature Neuroscience, and Cell Reports. Notably, bioRxiv accounts for eight of their publications.

Recent papers include:

  • Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Examination: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5 (2023) in Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
  • Improved Performance of ChatGPT-4 on the OKAP Exam: A Comparative Study with ChatGPT-3.5 (2023) in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Bidirectional control of infant rat social behavior via dopaminergic innervation of the basolateral amygdala (2021) in Neuron
  • Lateral entorhinal cortex lesions impair odor-context associative memory in male rats (2022) in Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Local origin of excitatory-inhibitory tuning equivalence in a cortical network (2024) in Nature Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators in Emma R. Wood's research include:

  • Peter C. Kind
  • Daisy Arkell
  • Oliver Hardt
  • Owen Dando
  • Paul A. Dudchenko

Best Publications

  • Schemas and memory consolidation

    Dorothy Tse;Rosamund F. Langston;Masaki Kakeyama;Ingrid Bethus

  • The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells: Is It Spatial Memory or a Memory Space?

    Howard Eichenbaum;Paul Dudchenko;Emma Wood;Matthew Shapiro

  • Hippocampal neurons encode information about different types of memory episodes occurring in the same location.

    Emma R. Wood;Paul A. Dudchenko;R.Jonathan Robitsek;Howard Eichenbaum

  • The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity.

    Emma R. Wood;Paul A. Dudchenko;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial

    Martin Dennis;Gillian Mead;John Forbes;Catriona Graham

  • Object-recognition memory is only mildly impaired in rats with lesions of the hippocampus and amygdala

    Dave G. Mumby;Emma R. Wood;John P. J. Pinel

  • Associative recognition and the hippocampus: differential effects of hippocampal lesions on object-place, object-context and object-place-context memory.

    Rosamund F. Langston;Emma R. Wood

  • Neurotoxic Hippocampal Lesions Have No Effect on Odor Span and Little Effect on Odor Recognition Memory But Produce Significant Impairments on Spatial Span, Recognition, and Alternation

    Paul A. Dudchenko;Emma R. Wood;Howard Eichenbaum

  • Exploring the role of context-dependent hippocampal activity in spatial alternation behavior.

    James A. Ainge;Matthijs A.A. van der Meer;Rosamund F. Langston;Emma R. Wood

  • Impaired object recognition memory in rats following ischemia-induced damage to the hippocampus

    Emma R. Wood;Dave G. Mumby;John P. Pinel;Anthony G. Phillips

  • Nonrecurring-items delayed nonmatching-to-sample in rats: A new paradigm for testing nonspatial working memory

    Dave G. Mumby;John P. J. Pinel;Emma R. Wood

  • The role of hippocampal subregions in memory for stimulus associations.

    Rosamund F. Langston;Cassie H. Stevenson;Claire L. Wilson;Ian Saunders

  • The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size.

    James A Ainge;Claire Heron-Maxwell;Panos Theofilas;Paul Wright

  • Ischemia-induced object-recognition deficits in rats are attenuated by hippocampal ablation before or soon after ischemia

    David G. Mumby;Emma R. Wood;Christopher A. Duva;Tom J. Kornecook

  • Rapid Disruption of Axon–Glial Integrity in Response to Mild Cerebral Hypoperfusion

    Michell Mario Reimer;Jamie McQueen;Luke Searcy;Gillian Scullion

  • Place cells on a maze encode routes rather than destinations

    Roddy M Grieves;Roddy M Grieves;Emma R Wood;Paul A Dudchenko;Paul A Dudchenko

  • Conserved hippocampal cellular pathophysiology but distinct behavioural deficits in a new rat model of FXS

    Sally M. Till;Antonis Asiminas;Adam D. Jackson;Danai Katsanevaki

  • Gliovascular disruption and cognitive deficits in a mouse model with features of small vessel disease

    Philip R Holland;James L Searcy;Natalia Salvadores;Gillian Scullion

  • Expectancies in decision making, reinforcement learning, and ventral striatum.

    Matthijs A. A. van der Meer;A. David Redish

  • Place field repetition and spatial learning in a multicompartment environment

    Roddy M. Grieves;Roddy M. Grieves;Bryan W. Jenkins;Bruce C. Harland;Bruce C. Harland;Emma R. Wood

  • Selective white matter pathology induces a specific impairment in spatial working memory

    Robin Coltman;Aisling Spain;Yanina Tsenkina;Jill H. Fowler

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Dudchenko
Paul A. Dudchenko University of Stirling
Howard Eichenbaum
Howard Eichenbaum Boston University
Peter C. Kind
Peter C. Kind University of Edinburgh
Sumantra Chattarji
Sumantra Chattarji National Centre for Biological Sciences
Anthony G. Phillips
Anthony G. Phillips University of British Columbia
John P. J. Pinel
John P. J. Pinel University of British Columbia
Karen Horsburgh
Karen Horsburgh University of Edinburgh
David J. A. Wyllie
David J. A. Wyllie University of Edinburgh
Masafumi Ihara
Masafumi Ihara Kyoto University
Jeremy Hall
Jeremy Hall Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in neuroscience goes hand-in-hand with various allied fields such as social work, psychology, and counseling. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider degrees that provide flexible, online, and accelerated pathways to rewarding careers. For instance, if you are looking for programs that can be completed rapidly, 1 year msw programs online offer a streamlined route to a master's in social work, opening up roles in mental health, public health, and clinical practice.

Similarly, those considering a faster entry into psychology-related careers may benefit from fast track psychology degree online options. These programs help students quickly build foundational knowledge for further neuroscience study or applied psychology roles.

Counseling is another important pathway closely related to neuroscience. The university of the cumberlands school counseling program stands out for affordability and CACREP accreditation, an essential credential for many professional counseling positions.

Many universities also offer online masters counseling programs that prepare graduates to support diverse populations, integrating neuroscience principles into therapeutic practice. By exploring these related degrees, you can create flexible and specialized interdisciplinary career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Emma R. Wood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles