World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
18746
World Ranking
2977
National Ranking
1383

A. David Redish publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. David Redish sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

A. David Redish D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. David Redish sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

A. David Redish is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

They have contributed extensively to scientific literature, publishing in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), arXiv (Cornell University), Nature Neuroscience, Hippocampus, and Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Their recent papers include:

  • "Formalizing planning and information search in naturalistic decision-making" (2021) published in Nature Neuroscience
  • "Divergent Strategies for Learning in Males and Females" (2020) published in Current Biology
  • "On the Role of Theory and Modeling in Neuroscience" (2023) published in Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species" (2021) published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Global disruption in excitation-inhibition balance can cause localized network dysfunction and Schizophrenia-like context-integration deficits" (2021) published in PLoS Computational Biology

Frequent coauthors with whom they have collaborated include Olivia L. Calvin, Sophia Vinogradov, Brian M. Sweis, Ugurcan Mugan, and Cody J. Walters.

Among their book publications, they have published "Changing How We Choose" (2022) with The MIT Press.

A. David Redish was awarded the Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Neural Ensembles in CA3 Transiently Encode Paths Forward of the Animal at a Decision Point

    Adam Johnson;A. David Redish

  • Hippocampal replay is not a simple function of experience.

    Anoopum S. Gupta;Matthijs A.A. van der Meer;David S. Touretzky;A. David Redish

  • Viewpoints: how the hippocampus contributes to memory, navigation and cognition

    John Lisman;György Buzsáki;Howard Eichenbaum;Lynn Nadel

  • Quantitative measures of cluster quality for use in extracellular recordings

    N. Schmitzer-Torbert;J. Jackson;D. Henze;K. Harris

  • A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process

    A. David Redish;Steve Jensen;Adam Johnson

  • Addiction as a Computational Process Gone Awry

    A. David Redish

  • Exploration versus exploitation in space, mind, and society

    Thomas Trenholm Hills;Peter M. Todd;David Lazer;David Lazer;A. David Redish

  • Addiction as vulnerabilities in the decision process

    A. David Redish;Steve Jensen;Adam Johnson

  • Beyond the Cognitive Map: From Place Cells to Episodic Memory

    A. David Redish

  • Vicarious trial and error.

    A. David Redish

  • Reconciling reinforcement learning models with behavioral extinction and renewal: implications for addiction, relapse, and problem gambling.

    A. David Redish;Steve Jensen;Adam Johnson;Zeb Kurth-Nelson

  • Segmentation of spatial experience by hippocampal theta sequences

    Anoopum S Gupta;Matthijs A A van der Meer;David S Touretzky;A David Redish

  • Hippocampal theta sequences reflect current goals

    Andrew M Wikenheiser;A David Redish

  • The role of the hippocampus in solving the Morris water maze

    A. David Redish;David S. Touretzky

  • Cognitive Maps Beyond the Hippocampus

    A. David Redish;David S. Touretzky;David S. Touretzky

  • Theory of rodent navigation based on interacting representations of space

    David S. Touretzky;A. David Redish

  • Prediction, sequences and the hippocampus.

    John Lisman;A.D. Redish

  • Integrating hippocampus and striatum in decision-making

    Adam Johnson;Matthijs A. A. Van Der Meer;A. David Redish

  • Triple Dissociation of Information Processing in Dorsal Striatum, Ventral Striatum, and Hippocampus on a Learned Spatial Decision Task

    Matthijs A.A. van der Meer;Adam Johnson;Adam Johnson;Neil C. Schmitzer-Torbert;Neil C. Schmitzer-Torbert;A. David Redish

  • Covert expectation-of-reward in rat ventral striatum at decision points

    Matthijs A A Van Der Meer;A. David Redish

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Touretzky
David S. Touretzky Carnegie Mellon University
Angus W. MacDonald
Angus W. MacDonald University of Minnesota
Mark J. Thomas
Mark J. Thomas University of Minnesota
Carol A. Barnes
Carol A. Barnes University of Arizona
Bruce L. McNaughton
Bruce L. McNaughton University of California, Irvine
Joshua A. Gordon
Joshua A. Gordon National Institutes of Health
Warren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel Virginia Tech
Veronica A. Alvarez
Veronica A. Alvarez National Institutes of Health
Lynn Nadel
Lynn Nadel University of Arizona
Charan Ranganath
Charan Ranganath University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens the door to a diverse range of careers in healthcare, research, and mental health services. In addition to traditional neuroscience degrees, there are many related online options to consider for those looking to broaden their expertise or pivot in their career paths.

For those interested in mental health, you can find accelerated msw programs without bsw, making it possible to earn a Master of Social Work even if your undergraduate degree is not in social work. Another alternative is pursuing an accelerated psychology degree, which can prepare you for roles in counseling, therapy, or research.

If you’re aiming for a counseling career, it’s essential to look for cacrep-accredited programs online, as CACREP accreditation is preferred or required by many employers and state licensure boards. Affordability is also a key concern for many students; explore affordable online masters counseling programs to find high-quality options that won't break the bank.

By considering these related online degrees and career pathways, you can tailor your education to match your interests and achieve your professional goals in the neuroscience or broader behavioral health fields.

Best Scientists Citing A. David Redish

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles