World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
94783
World Ranking
8716
National Ranking
263

Kurt Straif publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Straif sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 364 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kurt Straif D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kurt Straif sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kurt Straif is affiliated with the International Agency For Research On Cancer in France. Their research spans major fields such as Medicine and Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cancer Research, and Physiology.

The scientist's work addresses numerous topics related to environmental and occupational health, with emphasis on Air Quality and Health Impacts, Occupational and Environmental Lung Diseases, Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment, Climate Change and Health Impacts, Occupational Exposure and Asthma, COVID-19 and Mental Health, and Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging.

Frequent coauthors of Straif include:

  • Manolis Kogevinas
  • Hans Kromhout
  • Ann Olsson
  • Joachim Schüz
  • Roel Vermeulen

Research has been published in several venues, the most frequent being:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Abstracts
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • Environmental Health
  • Oral Presentations

Among their recent papers are:

  • WHO Air Quality Guidelines 2021-Aiming for Healthier Air for all: A Joint Statement by Medical, Public Health, Scientific Societies and Patient Representative Organisations (2021, International Journal of Public Health)
  • Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Subtype Risks. A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies (2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)
  • Aspartame and cancer - new evidence for causation (2021, Environmental Health)
  • Diesel Engine Exhaust Exposure, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Subtype Risks. A Pooled Exposure-Response Analysis of 14 Case-Control Studies (2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)
  • Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Lung Cancer Risk: Results from a Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies (SYNERGY) (2022, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention)

Best Publications

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Christopher J.L. Murray;Christopher J.L. Murray;Christopher J.L. Murray;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Aleksandr Y. Aravkin;Peng Zheng;Peng Zheng;Peng Zheng;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati;Cristiana Abbafati

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Mohammad H Forouzanfar;Lily Alexander;H Ross Anderson;Victoria F Bachman

  • Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Mohsen Naghavi;Haidong Wang;Rafael Lozano;Adrian Davis

  • A review of human carcinogens--Part B: biological agents

    Véronique Bouvard;Robert Baan;Kurt Straif;Yann Grosse

  • Body Fatness and Cancer — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group

    Béatrice Lauby-Secretan;Chiara Scoccianti;Dana Loomis;Yann Grosse

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013

    Mohammad H. Forouzanfar;Lily Alexander;H. Ross Anderson;Victoria F. Bachman

  • Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat

    Véronique Bouvard;Dana Loomis;Kathryn Z Guyton;Yann Grosse

  • Spatial, temporal, and demographic patterns in prevalence of smoking tobacco use and attributable disease burden in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

    Marissa B Reitsma;Parkes J Kendrick;Emad Ababneh;Cristiana Abbafati

  • The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution.

    Dana Loomis;Yann Grosse;Béatrice Lauby-Secretan;Fatiha El Ghissassi

  • A review of human carcinogens--Part E: tobacco, areca nut, alcohol, coal smoke, and salted fish.

    Béatrice Secretan;Kurt Straif;Robert Baan;Yann Grosse

  • Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting.

    Kurt Straif;Robert Baan;Yann Grosse;Béatrice Secretan

  • IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans: Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene

    Ahti Anttila;Ramesh V. Bhat;James A. Bond;Susan J. Borghoff

  • Carcinogenicity of alcoholic beverages

    Robert Baan;Kurt Straif;Yann Grosse;Béatrice Secretan

  • A review of human carcinogens--part D: radiation.

    Fatiha El Ghissassi;Robert Baan;Kurt Straif;Yann Grosse

  • Tobacco smoking and cancer: a brief review of recent epidemiological evidence.

    A.J. Sasco;A.J. Sasco;M.B. Secretan;K. Straif

  • Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields

    Robert Baan;Yann Grosse;Béatrice Lauby-Secretan;Fatiha El Ghissassi

  • Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group

    Béatrice Lauby‑Secretan;Chiara Scoccianti;Dana Loomis;Lamia Benbrahim‑Tallaa

  • Carcinogenicity of tetrachlorvinphos, parathion, malathion, diazinon, and glyphosate

    Kathryn Z Guyton;Dana Loomis;Yann Grosse;Fatiha El Ghissassi

  • Carcinogenicity of human papillomaviruses.

    Vincent Cogliano;Robert Baan;Kurt Straif;Yann Grosse

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Kromhout
Hans Kromhout Utrecht University
Roel Vermeulen
Roel Vermeulen Utrecht University
Paolo Boffetta
Paolo Boffetta Stony Brook Medicine
Thomas Brüning
Thomas Brüning Ruhr University Bochum
Jack Siemiatycki
Jack Siemiatycki University of Montreal
Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Karl-Heinz Jöckel University of Duisburg-Essen
Eleonora Fabianova
Eleonora Fabianova Regional Authority of Public Health
Jolanta Lissowska
Jolanta Lissowska Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Lenka Foretova
Lenka Foretova Masaryk University
Dario Consonni
Dario Consonni University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Medicine but want flexible alternatives, the U.S. education system offers several online options. For those who hold a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors allow you to transition into advanced nursing roles efficiently. These programs are ideal for career changers interested in healthcare.

Some students may prefer undergraduate routes. Options such as direct admit nursing programs let you start nursing coursework immediately after admission, eliminating the wait to enter nursing school. In addition, specialized nursing schools are available for those concerned about entrance exams; you can find nursing schools that don’t require teas or hesi tests, reducing barriers to entry.

Beyond clinical roles, there are non-patient-facing options as well. Programs in online medical billing and coding with financial aid can prepare you for vital administrative careers in healthcare, with flexible scheduling and financial support available. These varied pathways make it easier to join the healthcare industry according to your goals and background.

Best Scientists Citing Kurt Straif

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles