World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3475 3201 584 535 151 40840

Karen Devries publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen Devries between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen Devries published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 13 of the 193 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

193 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen Devries: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 4
2010 2
2011 9
2012 2
2013 12
2014 14
2015 13
2016 23
2017 15
2018 11
2019 6
2020 10
2021 10
2022 14
2023 12
2024 19
2025 12
2026 1
Total 193
Download as CSV

Karen Devries publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Devries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 144–153 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 151 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407 151
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen Devries D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Devries sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Karen Devries is affiliated with the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of violence, health, and social issues, particularly concerning children and intimate partner relationships.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology, social sciences, and health professions, with a notable emphasis on clinical psychology. Their work spans subfields such as health, general health professions, sociology and political science, and safety research.

Key topics in their research include child abuse and trauma, intimate partner and family violence, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, migration, health and trauma, homelessness and social issues, sex work and related issues, and poverty, education, and child welfare.

Devries has published multiple papers in various journals. Some recently published works include:

  • Violence against children during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2021, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • COVID-19 response measures and violence against children, 2020, Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • Violence against children and intimate partner violence against women: overlap and common contributing factors among caregiver-adolescent dyads, 2020, BMC Public Health
  • Modelling the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on violent discipline against children, 2020, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Intensified inequities: Young people's experiences of Covid-19 and school closures in Uganda, 2022, Children & Society

The frequent co-authors working with Devries include Amiya Bhatia, Dipak Naker, Camilla Fabbri, Ellen Turner, and Louise Knight.

Devries's research is regularly published in venues such as BMC Public Health, BMJ Open, Child Abuse & Neglect, PLOS Global Public Health, and SSM - Qualitative Research in Health.

Best Publications

  • A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Stephen S. Lim;Theo Vos;Abraham D. Flaxman;Goodarz Danaei

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Mohammad H Forouzanfar;Lily Alexander;H Ross Anderson;Victoria F Bachman

  • Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013

    Mohammad H. Forouzanfar;Lily Alexander;H. Ross Anderson;Victoria F. Bachman

  • Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.

    Garcia-Moreno C;Pallitto C;Devries K;Stockl H

  • The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women

    K. M. Devries;Joelle Y. T. Mak;C. García-Moreno;M. Petzold

  • What Factors Are Associated With Recent Intimate Partner Violence? Findings From the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence

    Tanya Abramsky;Charlotte H. Watts;Claudia Garcia-Moreno;Karen Devries

  • Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies

    Karen Devries;Joelle Mak;Loraine J Bacchus;Jennifer Christine Child

  • The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: a systematic review.

    Heidi Stöckl;Karen Devries;Alexandra Rotstein;Naeemah Abrahams

  • Violence against women is strongly associated with suicide attempts: Evidence from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women

    Karen Devries;Charlotte Watts;Mieko Yoshihama;Ligia Kiss

  • Intimate partner violence during pregnancy: analysis of prevalence data from 19 countries

    Karen M. Devries;Sunita Kishor;Holly Johnson;Heidi Stöckl

  • Intimate partner violence victimization and alcohol consumption in women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Karen M. Devries;Jennifer C. Child;Loraine J. Bacchus;Joelle Y. T. Mak

  • Findings from the SASA! Study: a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of a community mobilization intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV risk in Kampala, Uganda

    Tanya Abramsky;Karen Devries;Ligia Kiss;Janet Nakuti

  • Worldwide prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: a systematic review

    Naeemah Abrahams;Karen Devries;Charlotte H. Watts;Christina Pallitto

  • Recent intimate partner violence against women and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

    Loraine J Bacchus;Meghna Ranganathan;Charlotte Watts;Karen Devries

  • Global differences between women and men in the prevalence of obesity: is there an association with gender inequality?

    F Garawi;K Devries;N Thorogood;R Uauy

  • Associations between intimate partner violence and health among men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Ana Maria Buller;Karen M. Devries;Louise M. Howard;Loraine J. Bacchus

  • Childhood sexual abuse and suicidal behavior: a meta-analysis.

    Karen M Devries;Joelle Mak;Jennifer Christine Child;Gail Falder

  • The Good School Toolkit for reducing physical violence from school staff to primary school students: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Uganda

    Karen M Devries;Louise Knight;Jennifer C Child;BA Angel Mirembe

  • Who perpetrates violence against children? A systematic analysis of age-specific and sex-specific data

    Karen Devries;Louise Knight;Max Petzold;Katherine G. Merrill

  • Estimating the Effect of Intimate Partner Violence on Women's Use of Contraception: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Lauren Maxwell;Karen Devries;Danielle Zionts;Jeanne L. Alhusen

  • Burden attributable to child maltreatment in Australia

    Sophie E. Moore;James G. Scott;Alize J. Ferrari;Ryan Mills

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlotte Watts
Charlotte Watts London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Kaye Wellings
Kaye Wellings London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Graham Hart
Graham Hart University College London
Phil Edwards
Phil Edwards London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Ian Roberts
Ian Roberts London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Heidi Stöckl
Heidi Stöckl University of London
Claudia Garcia-Moreno
Claudia Garcia-Moreno World Health Organization
Lori Heise
Lori Heise Johns Hopkins University
Naeemah Abrahams
Naeemah Abrahams South African Medical Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Social Sciences and Humanities unlocks a diverse range of career paths—from counseling to education leadership. With the growth of flexible online programs, students can now access high-quality education from anywhere, tailoring their studies to fit their schedules and career goals.

For those interested in clinical practice, psyd programs online provide a direct route into professional psychology roles. If helping families and couples is your passion, consider affordable online mft programs, which train you for marriage and family therapy positions.

Psychology remains one of the most popular fields, and several universities now offer affordable online masters in psychology to help students advance in counseling, social work, or research. Meanwhile, those aiming for leadership roles in education may benefit from accelerated doctoral programs in education online, designed for working professionals seeking rapid career progression.

Exploring these online degree options not only broadens your academic horizons but also opens doors to fulfilling careers in both public and private sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Devries

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles