World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
10887
World Ranking
7756
National Ranking
3329

Mark J. Thomas publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark J. Thomas D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Thomas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark J. Thomas is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a substantial body of work totaling 28 related publications. Within neuroscience, their studies engage deeply with cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, and general decision sciences.

Their work covers several key topics, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Ion channel regulation and function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Mark J. Thomas has published in a variety of scientific venues, with the most frequent venues being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Communications Biology
  • Neuron
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • Psychopharmacology

Some recent notable papers authored by Thomas include:

  • "Dopamine-Evoked Synaptic Regulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Requires Astrocyte Activity" (2020, Neuron)
  • "A quadruple dissociation of reward-related behaviour in mice across excitatory inputs to the nucleus accumbens shell" (2023, Communications Biology)
  • "The ethanol metabolite acetic acid activates mouse nucleus accumbens shell medium spiny neurons" (2021, Journal of Neurophysiology)
  • "Caveolin-1 regulates medium spiny neuron structural and functional plasticity" (2020, Psychopharmacology)
  • "Sunk cost sensitivity during change-of-mind decisions is informed by both the spent and remaining costs" (2022, Communications Biology)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Andrew D. Chapp
  • P. Mermelstein
  • Brian M. Sweis
  • Chinonso A. Nwakama
  • A. David Redish

Best Publications

  • A new prognostic classification of chronic lymphocytic leukemia derived from a multivariate survival analysis.

    J. L. Binet;A. Auquier;G. Dighiero;C. Chastang

  • Long-term depression in the nucleus accumbens: a neural correlate of behavioral sensitization to cocaine.

    Mark J. Thomas;Corinne Beurrier;Antonello Bonci;Robert C. Malenka

  • Selective vulnerability of dentate hilar neurons following traumatic brain injury: a potential mechanistic link between head trauma and disorders of the hippocampus

    Daniel H. Lowenstein;Mark J. Thomas;Douglas H. Smith;Tracy K. McIntosh

  • Biological substrates of reward and aversion: a nucleus accumbens activity hypothesis.

    William A. Carlezon;Mark J. Thomas

  • Neuroplasticity in the mesolimbic dopamine system and cocaine addiction

    Mark J Thomas;P. W. Kalivas;Y. Shaham

  • Cocaine Experience Controls Bidirectional Synaptic Plasticity in the Nucleus Accumbens

    Saïd Kourrich;Patrick E. Rothwell;Jason R. Klug;Mark J. Thomas

  • Evaluation of memory dysfunction following experimental brain injury using the Morris water maze.

    Douglas H. Smith;Koichi Okiyama;Mark J. Thomas;Brian Claussen

  • Activity-Dependent β-Adrenergic Modulation of Low Frequency Stimulation Induced LTP in the Hippocampal CA1 Region

    Mark J Thomas;Teena D Moody;Mike Makhinson;Thomas J O'Dell

  • Dopamine-Evoked Synaptic Regulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Requires Astrocyte Activity.

    Michelle Corkrum;Ana Covelo;Justin Lines;Luigi Bellocchio

  • Modulation of long-term depression by dopamine in the mesolimbic system.

    Mark J. Thomas;Robert C. Malenka;Antonello Bonci

  • Postsynaptic Complex Spike Bursting Enables the Induction of LTP by Theta Frequency Synaptic Stimulation

    Mark J. Thomas;Ayako M. Watabe;Teena D. Moody;Michael Makhinson

  • Hippocampal long-term potentiation is normal in heme oxygenase-2 mutant mice

    Kenneth D. Poss;Mark J. Thomas;Alexander K. Ebralidze;Thomas J. O'Dell

  • Cocaine-induced potentiation of synaptic strength in dopamine neurons: Behavioral correlates in GluRA(–/–) mice

    Y. Dong;D. Saal;M. Thomas;R. Faust

  • Behavioral and structural responses to chronic cocaine require a feedforward loop involving ΔFosB and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the nucleus accumbens shell.

    Alfred J. Robison;Vincent Vialou;Michelle Mazei-Robison;Jian Feng

  • Synaptic plasticity in the mesolimbic dopamine system.

    Mark J Thomas;Robert C Malenka

  • Sensitivity to “sunk costs” in mice, rats, and humans

    Brian M. Sweis;Samantha V. Abram;Brandy J. Schmidt;Kelsey D. Seeland

  • Reversal of morphine-induced cell-type–specific synaptic plasticity in the nucleus accumbens shell blocks reinstatement

    Matthew C. Hearing;Jakub Jedynak;Stephanie R. Ebner;Anna Ingebretson

  • Similar Neurons, Opposite Adaptations: Psychostimulant Experience Differentially Alters Firing Properties in Accumbens Core versus Shell

    Saïd Kourrich;Mark J. Thomas

  • Effects of the excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists kynurenate and indole-2-carboxylic acid on behavioral and neurochemical outcome following experimental brain injury

    Douglas H. Smith;Koichi Okiyama;Mark J. Thomas;Tracy K. McIntosh

  • Development of prolonged focal cerebral edema and regional cation changes following experimental brain injury in the rat.

    Holly D. Soares;Mark Thomas;Keri Cloherty;Tracy K. McIntosh

Frequent Co-Authors

A. David Redish
A. David Redish University of Minnesota
Thomas J. O'Dell
Thomas J. O'Dell University of California, Los Angeles
Robert C. Malenka
Robert C. Malenka Stanford University
Paul G. Mermelstein
Paul G. Mermelstein University of Minnesota
Mark Mayford
Mark Mayford University of California, San Diego
Antonello Bonci
Antonello Bonci National Institute on Drug Abuse
Angus W. MacDonald
Angus W. MacDonald University of Minnesota
Joe Z. Tsien
Joe Z. Tsien Augusta University
Kirill A. Martemyanov
Kirill A. Martemyanov Scripps Research Institute
Terry E. Robinson
Terry E. Robinson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Thomas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles