World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 52 5207 4783 2326 2102 128 20670

Joe Z. Tsien publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joe Z. Tsien between 1996 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joe Z. Tsien published across 24 years, from 1996 to 2019, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 7 of the 131 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication
1996 2019

131 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joe Z. Tsien: publications per year, 1996 to 2019
Year Publications
1996 4
1997 0
1998 0
1999 4
2000 8
2001 7
2002 3
2003 1
2004 2
2005 4
2006 4
2007 11
2008 7
2009 8
2010 8
2011 8
2012 5
2013 10
2014 6
2015 6
2016 12
2017 6
2018 6
2019 1
Total 131
Download as CSV

Joe Z. Tsien publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joe Z. Tsien sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 128 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 128
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Joe Z. Tsien D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joe Z. Tsien sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418 52
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Joe Z. Tsien is affiliated with Augusta University in the United States. Their academic contributions are linked to this institution, indicating an active role in research and education within this setting.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics listed for Joe Z. Tsien in the available data. Consequently, no detailed information about specific research focuses, collaborations, or publication activity can be provided at this time.

There is also no information about awards or recognitions associated with Joe Z. Tsien, nor any indication of the scientist being deceased.

Based on the available data, it is clear that Joe Z. Tsien's professional profile is connected to Augusta University, but comprehensive details on their research contributions or academic impact are not accessible from the current source.

Best Publications

  • Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice

    Ya Ping Tang;Eiji Shimizu;Gilles R. Dube;Claire Rampon

  • The Essential Role of Hippocampal CA1 NMDA Receptor–Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in Spatial Memory

    Joe Z Tsien;Patricio T Huerta;Susumu Tonegawa

  • Subregion- and Cell Type–Restricted Gene Knockout in Mouse Brain

    Joe Z Tsien;Dong Feng Chen;David Gerber;Cindy Tom

  • Enrichment induces structural changes and recovery from nonspatial memory deficits in CA1 NMDAR1-knockout mice.

    Claire Rampon;Ya Ping Tang;Joe Goodhouse;Eiji Shimizu

  • Impaired Hippocampal Representation of Space in CA1-Specific NMDAR1 Knockout Mice

    Thomas J McHugh;Kenneth I Blum;Joe Z Tsien;Susumu Tonegawa

  • Effects of environmental enrichment on gene expression in the brain

    Claire Rampon;Cecilia H. Jiang;Helin Dong;Helin Dong;Ya Ping Tang

  • NMDA receptor-dependent synaptic reinforcement as a crucial process for memory consolidation.

    Eiji Shimizu;Ya-Ping Tang;Claire Rampon;Joe Z. Tsien

  • Deficient neurogenesis in forebrain-specific presenilin-1 knockout mice is associated with reduced clearance of hippocampal memory traces.

    Ruiben Feng;Ruiben Feng;Claire Rampon;Ya Ping Tang;David Shrom

  • Memory and the NMDA receptors.

    Fei Li;Joseph Zhuo Tsien

  • Acquired deficit of forebrain glucocorticoid receptor produces depression-like changes in adrenal axis regulation and behavior

    Maureen P. Boyle;Judson A. Brewer;Michiyo Funatsu;David F. Wozniak

  • c-fos regulates neuronal excitability and survival.

    Jianhua Zhang;Dongsheng Zhang;Jill Slane McQuade;Michael Behbehani

  • Differential effects of enrichment on learning and memory function in NR2B transgenic mice

    Y.-P Tang;H Wang;R Feng;M Kyin

  • The effects of aging on gene expression in the hypothalamus and cortex of mice.

    Cecilia H. Jiang;Joseph Zhuo Tsien;Peter G. Schultz;Yinghe Hu

  • Linking Hebb's coincidence-detection to memory formation.

    Joseph Zhuo Tsien

  • Genome-wide gene expression profiles of the developing mouse hippocampus

    Monica Mody;Yanxiang Cao;Zhenzhong Cui;Khoon Yen Tay

  • Molecular and systems mechanisms of memory consolidation and storage.

    Huimin Wang;Yinghe Hu;Joe Z. Tsien;Joe Z. Tsien

  • Inducible and Reversible NR1 Knockout Reveals Crucial Role of the NMDA Receptor in Preserving Remote Memories in the Brain

    Zhenzhong Cui;Huimin Wang;Yuansheng Tan;Kimberly A Zaia

  • Remote Measurements of Heart and Respiration Rates for Telemedicine

    Fang Zhao;Meng Li;Yi Qian;Joseph Zhuo Tsien

  • Organizing principles of real-time memory encoding : neural clique assemblies and universal neural codes

    Longnian Lin;Longnian Lin;Remus Osan;Joe Z. Tsien

  • A Critical Role of the Adenosine A2A Receptor in Extrastriatal Neurons in Modulating Psychomotor Activity as Revealed by Opposite Phenotypes of Striatum and Forebrain A2A Receptor Knock-Outs

    Hai Ying Shen;Joana E. Coelho;Nobuhisa Ohtsuka;Paula M. Canas

  • Maintenance of superior learning and memory function in NR2B transgenic mice during ageing.

    Xiaohua Cao;Zhenzhong Cui;Ruiben Feng;Ya Ping Tang

  • Neuronal PPARγ Deficiency Increases Susceptibility to Brain Damage after Cerebral Ischemia

    Xiurong Zhao;Roger Strong;Jie Zhang;Guanghua Sun

Frequent Co-Authors

Claire Rampon
Claire Rampon Federal University of Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées
Kevan M. Shokat
Kevan M. Shokat University of California, San Francisco
Min Zhuo
Min Zhuo University of Toronto
Peter G. Schultz
Peter G. Schultz Scripps Research Institute
Dajiang Zhu
Dajiang Zhu The University of Texas at Arlington
Hanchuan Peng
Hanchuan Peng Southeast University
Thomas J. McHugh
Thomas J. McHugh RIKEN Center for Brain Science
Mark Mayford
Mark Mayford University of California, San Diego
Feng Wei
Feng Wei University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open up diverse career opportunities both inside and outside academic research. Many students consider expanding their qualifications with online graduate degrees in counseling, therapy, and psychology—fields that closely align with neuroscience, especially in clinical and mental health settings.

Those interested in becoming licensed counselors might look into cacrep online masters in counseling programs, which ensure a standardized, high-quality education. If affordability is a key concern, exploring cheapest online lpc programs can help students find budget-friendly pathways to licensure as a Licensed Professional Counselor.

For those interested in family dynamics and relationship counseling, an online masters mft can pave the way to becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist—a role closely tied to understanding brain behavior and emotional health.

Alternatively, a masters in psychology online offers a flexible option for those wanting broader psychological training alongside a neuroscience background, enhancing career prospects in mental health, education, or research fields.

Best Scientists Citing Joe Z. Tsien

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles