World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 61 3715 3397 1702 1534 172 11583

Danny G. Winder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danny G. Winder between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danny G. Winder published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 14 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 3 publications
1992 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danny G. Winder: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 4
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 5
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 7
2007 3
2008 7
2009 9
2010 6
2011 9
2012 8
2013 11
2014 6
2015 5
2016 5
2017 8
2018 8
2019 11
2020 10
2021 11
2022 9
2023 11
2024 11
2025 3
Total 195
Download as CSV

Danny G. Winder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny G. Winder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 172 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 172
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Danny G. Winder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danny G. Winder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328 61
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Danny G. Winder is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and primarily conducts research in the field of neuroscience, with a particular focus on cellular and molecular neuroscience. Their body of work also encompasses cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, pharmacology, and physiology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior
  • Neuroscience and neuropharmacology research
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Receptor mechanisms and signaling
  • Stress responses and cortisol
  • Cannabis and cannabinoid research
  • Alcohol consumption and health effects

Among recent publications authored by or involving Winder are:

  • "Acute restraint stress redirects prefrontal cortex circuit function through mGlu5 receptor plasticity on somatostatin-expressing interneurons", 2022, published in Neuron
  • "BNST GluN2D-Containing NMDA Receptors Influence Anxiety- and Depressive-like Behaviors and Modulate Cell-Specific Excitatory/Inhibitory Synaptic Balance", 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Contrasting sex-dependent adaptations to synaptic physiology and membrane properties of prefrontal cortex interneuron subtypes in a mouse model of binge drinking", 2020, Neuropharmacology
  • "Delineation of an insula-BNST circuit engaged by struggling behavior that regulates avoidance in mice", 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Danger and distress: Parabrachial-extended amygdala circuits", 2021, Neuropharmacology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Winder include:

  • Samuel W. Centanni
  • Danielle N. Adank
  • Marie A. Doyle
  • Joseph R. Luchsinger
  • Sachin Patel

The venues where Winder has frequently published are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuropharmacology
  • Neuropsychopharmacology

Danny G. Winder's research contributes to understanding the neural mechanisms behind behavior, stress responses, and the physiology of neurotransmitter receptor systems through both molecular and cellular approaches. Their work spans experimental studies involving synaptic physiology, pharmacological influences, and neural circuit dynamics related to behaviors such as anxiety, depression, and responses to substances including alcohol and cannabinoids.

Best Publications

  • Inducible and reversible enhancement of learning, memory, and long-term potentiation by genetic inhibition of calcineurin

    Gaël Malleret;Ursula Haditsch;David Genoux;Matthew W. Jones

  • Rolipram, a type IV-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, facilitates the establishment of long-lasting long-term potentiation and improves memory

    Mark Barad;Roussoudan Bourtchouladze;Danny G. Winder;Hava Golan

  • Roles of serine/threonine phosphatases in hippocampal synaptic plasticity.

    D G Winder;J D Sweatt

  • Genetic and Pharmacological Evidence for a Novel, Intermediate Phase of Long-Term Potentiation Suppressed by Calcineurin

    Danny G Winder;Isabelle M Mansuy;Mona Osman;Theodore M Moallem

  • ERK Plays a Regulatory Role in Induction of LTP by Theta Frequency Stimulation and Its Modulation by β-Adrenergic Receptors

    Danny G Winder;Kelsey C Martin;Isabel A Muzzio;Daniel Rohrer

  • Inducible and Reversible Gene Expression with the rtTA System for the Study of Memory

    Isabelle M Mansuy;Danny G Winder;Theodore M Moallem;Mona Osman

  • Rap1 couples cAMP signaling to a distinct pool of p42/44MAPK regulating excitability, synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory.

    Alexei Morozov;Isabel A Muzzio;Rusiko Bourtchouladze;Niels Van-Strien

  • Strain differences in stress responsivity are associated with divergent amygdala gene expression and glutamate-mediated neuronal excitability

    Khyobeni Mozhui;Rose Marie Karlsson;Thomas L. Kash;Jessica Ihne

  • Differential involvement of group II and group III mGluRs as autoreceptors at lateral and medial perforant path synapses

    T. A. Macek;D. G. Winder;R. W. Gereau;C. O. Ladd

  • Activation of NR2A-Containing NMDA Receptors Is Not Obligatory for NMDA Receptor-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation

    Carl Weitlauf;Yumiko Honse;Yves P. Auberson;Masayoshi Mishina

  • Neuropeptide Y and corticotropin-releasing factor bi-directionally modulate inhibitory synaptic transmission in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

    Thomas L. Kash;Danny G. Winder

  • Genetic Disruption of 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Synthesis Reveals a Key Role for Endocannabinoid Signaling in Anxiety Modulation

    Brian C. Shonesy;Rebecca J. Bluett;Teniel S. Ramikie;Rita Báldi

  • BNST neurocircuitry in humans.

    Suzanne N. Avery;Jacqueline A. Clauss;Danny G. Winder;Neil D. Woodward

  • Repeated Homotypic Stress Elevates 2-Arachidonoylglycerol Levels and Enhances Short-Term Endocannabinoid Signaling at Inhibitory Synapses in Basolateral Amygdala

    Sachin Patel;Philip J Kingsley;Ken Mackie;Lawrence J Marnett

  • A Corticotropin Releasing Factor Pathway for Ethanol Regulation of the Ventral Tegmental Area in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis

    Yuval Silberman;Robert T. Matthews;Danny G. Winder

  • Extracellular-Signal Regulated Kinase 1-Dependent Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5-Induced Long-Term Depression in the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Is Disrupted by Cocaine Administration

    Brad A. Grueter;Heather B. Gosnell;Christopher M. Olsen;Nicole L. Schramm-Sapyta

  • Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors increases cAMP accumulation in hippocampus by potentiating responses to endogenous adenosine

    DG Winder;PJ Conn

  • Endocannabinoid signalling modulates susceptibility to traumatic stress exposure

    Rebecca J. Bluett;Rita Báldi;Andre Haymer;Andrew D. Gaulden

  • Norepinephrine modulates glutamatergic transmission in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

    Regula E Egli;Thomas L Kash;Kevin Choo;Valentina Savchenko

  • Alcohol exposure alters NMDAR function in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

    Thomas L. Kash;Thomas L. Kash;Anthony J. Baucum;Kelly L. Conrad;Roger J. Colbran

  • Dopamine enhances fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the extended amygdala by a CRF-R1-dependent process.

    Thomas L. Kash;William P. Nobis;Robert T. Matthews;Danny G. Winder

Frequent Co-Authors

Sachin Patel
Sachin Patel Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Thomas L. Kash
Thomas L. Kash University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
P. Jeffrey Conn
P. Jeffrey Conn Vanderbilt University
Roger J. Colbran
Roger J. Colbran Vanderbilt University
Eric R. Kandel
Eric R. Kandel Columbia University
Craig W. Lindsley
Craig W. Lindsley Vanderbilt University
Jennifer Urbano Blackford
Jennifer Urbano Blackford Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Isabelle M. Mansuy
Isabelle M. Mansuy University of Zurich
Lawrence J. Marnett
Lawrence J. Marnett Vanderbilt University
Alfred J. Robison
Alfred J. Robison Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a wide range of related fields, both in research and practice. For students interested in mental health and counseling, online mft programs provide a strong foundation for working with families and couples in clinical settings.

If you are considering a broader approach to understanding human behavior, an online degree in psychology is a popular and accessible option. These programs often offer flexible learning formats and diverse career opportunities in counseling, research, and education.

For those seeking advanced credentials at a lower cost, the cheapest online master's degree in psychology can prepare graduates for specialized roles in healthcare, industry, or academia. Cost-effective master's programs can make advancing your education more achievable.

Alternatively, pursuing an msw online degree can lead to a career in social work, allowing you to address complex social and psychological issues at the community level. With multiple online pathways available, you can find a degree that aligns with your interests and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Danny G. Winder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles