World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Friedrich G. Woermann

Friedrich G. Woermann

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
10488
World Ranking
4381
National Ranking
1982

Friedrich G. Woermann publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friedrich G. Woermann sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 189 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Friedrich G. Woermann D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Friedrich G. Woermann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Friedrich G. Woermann is affiliated with Bethel University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research primarily addresses topics related to epilepsy, neurological disorders, and brain function, with significant publications spanning several specialized subfields.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these broader disciplines, Woermann has focused on subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Woermann's body of work covers various scientific topics, particularly:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
  • Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

The scientist's recent publications reflect contributions to understanding epilepsy and neurological conditions, including:

  • External validation of automated focal cortical dysplasia detection using morphometric analysis, 2021, published in Epilepsia
  • Temporal lobe epilepsy with GAD antibodies: neurons killed by T cells not by complement membrane attack complex, 2022, published in Brain
  • Clinical Features, Neuropathology, and Surgical Outcome in Patients With Refractory Epilepsy and Brain Somatic Variants in the SLC35A2 Gene, 2022, published in Neurology
  • Mosaic trisomy of chromosome 1q in human brain tissue associates with unilateral polymicrogyria, very early-onset focal epilepsy, and severe developmental delay, 2020, published in Acta Neuropathologica
  • Negative content enhances stimulus-specific cerebral activity during free viewing of pictures, faces, and words, 2020, published in Human Brain Mapping

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Woermann include:

  • Christian G. Bien
  • Thilo Kalbhenn
  • Tilman Polster
  • Thomas Cloppenborg
  • Johanna Kißler

Woermann's research is frequently published in venues such as:

  • Epilepsia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Epileptology
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Frontiers in Neurology

Best Publications

  • Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy

    F. G. Woermann;H. Jokeit;R. Luerding;H. Freitag

  • Abnormal cerebral structure in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy demonstrated with voxel-based analysis of MRI

    F. G. Woermann;S. L. Free;M. J. Koepp;S. M. Sisodiya

  • EEG-triggered functional MRI of interictal epileptiform activity in patients with partial seizures

    K. Krakow;F. G. Woermann;M. R. Symms;P. J. Allen

  • Affective aggression in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantitative MRI study of the amygdala.

    L. Tebartz van Elst;F. G. Woermann;L. Lemieux;P. J. Thompson

  • Fast, accurate, and reproducible automatic segmentation of the brain in T1‐weighted volume MRI data

    Louis Lemieux;Georg Hagemann;Georg Hagemann;Karsten Krakow;Friedrich G. Woermann

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder and fMRI activation patterns of traumatic memory in patients with borderline personality disorder

    Martin Driessen;Thomas Beblo;Markus Mertens;Martina Piefke

  • Memory fMRI lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy

    Hennric Jokeit;Michael Okujava;Friedrich G. Woermann

  • Voxel-by-voxel comparison of automatically segmented cerebral gray matter--A rater-independent comparison of structural MRI in patients with epilepsy.

    Friedrich G. Woermann;Samantha L. Free;Matthias J. Koepp;John Ashburner

  • The contribution of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative epilepsy surgery evaluation for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: A meta-analysis

    O. Willmann;R. Wennberg;T. May;F.G. Woermann

  • Neuropathological abnormalities in schizophrenia: evidence from magnetization transfer imaging.

    J Foong;M R Symms;G J Barker;M Maier

  • Quantitative MRI in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Evidence of widespread cerebral structural changes.

    F G Woermann;S M Sisodiya;S L Free;J S Duncan

  • Regional changes in hippocampal T2 relaxation and volume: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study of hippocampal sclerosis

    Friedrich G Woermann;Gareth J Barker;Kim D Birnie;Heinz J Meencke

  • Epileptic activity influences the speech organization in medial temporal lobe epilepsy

    J. Janszky;H. Jokeit;D. Heinemann;R. Schulz

  • Short echo time single-voxel 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy in magnetic resonance imaging-negative temporal lobe epilepsy: different biochemical profile compared with hippocampal sclerosis.

    Friedrich G. Woermann;Mary A. McLean;Philippa A. Bartlett;Geoffrey J. Parker

  • Quantitative analysis of short echo time 1H-MRSI of cerebral gray and white matter

    Mary A. McLean;Friedrich G. Woermann;Gareth J. Barker;John S. Duncan

  • Functional organization of the brain with malformations of cortical development.

    Jozsef Janszky;Alois Ebner;Bernd Kruse;Markus Mertens

  • Amygdala enlargement in dysthymia--a volumetric study of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Ludger Tebartz van Elst;Friedrich G Woermann;Louis Lemieux;Michael R Trimble

  • Functional MRI Predicts Memory Performance after Right Mesiotemporal Epilepsy Surgery

    Jozsef Janszky;Hennric Jokeit;Konstantina Kontopoulou;Markus Mertens

  • Consensus on diagnosis and management of JME: From founder's observations to current trends.

    Dorothée G.A. Kasteleijn Nolst Trenité;Bettina Schmitz;Bettina Schmitz;Dieter Janz;Dieter Janz;Antonio V. Delgado-Escueta;Antonio V. Delgado-Escueta

  • Amygdala pathology in psychosis of epilepsy: A magnetic resonance imaging study in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.

    L. Tebartz van Elst;D. Baeumer;L. Lemieux;F. G. Woermann

  • Development of Hippocampal Atrophy: A Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in a Patient Who Developed Epilepsy After Generalized Status Epilepticus

    U. C. Wieshmann;F. G. Woermann;L. Lemieux;S. L. Free

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Alois Ebner
Alois Ebner Bethel University
Christian G. Bien
Christian G. Bien Bielefeld University
Matthias J. Koepp
Matthias J. Koepp University College London
Gareth J. Barker
Gareth J. Barker King's College London
Hans J. Markowitsch
Hans J. Markowitsch Bielefeld University
Samantha L. Free
Samantha L. Free University College London
Martin Driessen
Martin Driessen Bielefeld University
Louis Lemieux
Louis Lemieux University College London
Ingrid Tuxhorn
Ingrid Tuxhorn Bethel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to various interconnected fields, both in academics and career opportunities. For those seeking an expedited path in social service, a social work accelerated program provides practical skills for roles in healthcare, counseling, and community engagement. If your interests lean toward human behavior and mental processes, pursuing a best online psychology degree is an excellent way to build foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience careers.

For students focusing on clinical application and therapy, accredited programs are crucial. Consider cacrep accredited counseling programs to gain respected credentials in counseling, which frequently intersects with neuropsychological assessment and intervention. If affordability is a priority, exploring the cheapest online masters in mental health counseling offers a pathway to professional practice without overwhelming financial burden.

Whether your goal is research, therapy, or advocacy, these online degrees create diverse routes to complement and expand your neuroscience expertise, supporting a dynamic and meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Friedrich G. Woermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles