World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
9554
World Ranking
6169
National Ranking
2697

Paul G. Mermelstein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Mermelstein sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 88 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Paul G. Mermelstein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul G. Mermelstein sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Opposite Effects of mGluR1a and mGluR5 Activation on Nucleus Accumbens Medium Spiny Neuron Dendritic Spine Density

    Kellie S. Gross;Dieter D. Brandner;Luis A. Martinez;M. Foster Olive

  • L-type calcium channels and GSK-3 regulate the activity of NF-ATc4 in hippocampal neurons

    Isabella A. Graef;Paul G. Mermelstein;Kryn Stankunas;Joel R. Neilson

  • DARPP-32: Regulator of the Efficacy of Dopaminergic Neurotransmission

    A. A. Fienberg;N. Hiroi;Paul G Mermelstein;W. J. Song

  • Estradiol activates group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling, leading to opposing influences on cAMP response element-binding protein.

    Marissa I. Boulware;Jason P. Weick;Bryan R. Becklund;Bryan R. Becklund;Sidney P. Kuo

  • Signaling from synapse to nucleus: the logic behind the mechanisms.

    Karl Deisseroth;Paul G Mermelstein;Houhui Xia;Richard W Tsien

  • Caveolin Proteins Are Essential for Distinct Effects of Membrane Estrogen Receptors in Neurons

    Marissa I. Boulware;Holly Kordasiewicz;Holly Kordasiewicz;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • Membrane estrogen receptors activate the metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR5 and mGluR3 to bidirectionally regulate CREB phosphorylation in female rat striatal neurons

    Danielle Grove-Strawser;Marissa I. Boulware;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • Increased extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of the female rat during paced copulatory behavior

    Paul G. Mermelstein;Jill B. Becker

  • Critical dependence of cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation on L-type calcium channels supports a selective response to EPSPs in preference to action potentials.

    Paul G. Mermelstein;Haruhiko Bito;Haruhiko Bito;Karl Deisseroth;Richard W. Tsien

  • Membrane Estrogen Receptor-α Interactions with Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 1a Modulate Female Sexual Receptivity in Rats

    Phoebe Dewing;Marissa I. Boulware;Kevin Sinchak;Kevin Sinchak;Amy Christensen

  • Calcineurin regulation of neuronal plasticity

    Rachel D Groth;Robert L Dunbar;Paul G Mermelstein

  • Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Activation of NFAT (Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cells)-Dependent Transcription: A Role for the Transcription Factor NFATc4 in Neurotrophin-Mediated Gene Expression

    Rachel D. Groth;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • Membrane Estrogen Receptors Acting Through Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors: An Emerging Mechanism of Estrogen Action in Brain

    Paul E. Micevych;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • Interactions with PDZ Proteins Are Required for L-Type Calcium Channels to Activate cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein-Dependent Gene Expression

    Jason P. Weick;Rachel D. Groth;Ann L. Isaksen;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • CIPP, a Novel Multivalent PDZ Domain Protein, Selectively Interacts with Kir4.0 Family Members, NMDA Receptor Subunits, Neurexins, and Neuroligins

    Cornelia Kurschner;Paul G. Mermelstein;William T. Holden;D.James Surmeier

  • Rapid Estrogen Signaling in the Brain: Implications for the Fine-Tuning of Neuronal Circuitry

    Deepak P. Srivastava;Elizabeth M. Waters;Paul G. Mermelstein;Enikö A. Kramár

  • The weaver mutation of GIRK2 results in a loss of inwardly rectifying K+ current in cerebellar granule cells

    D J Surmeier;P G Mermelstein;D Goldowitz

  • Estrogen receptors stimulate brain region specific metabotropic glutamate receptors to rapidly initiate signal transduction pathways

    John Meitzen;Paul G. Mermelstein

  • Inwardly Rectifying Potassium (IRK) Currents Are Correlated with IRK Subunit Expression in Rat Nucleus Accumbens Medium Spiny Neurons

    Paul G. Mermelstein;Wen Jie Song;Tatiana Tkatch;Zhen Yan

  • The influence of estradiol on nervous system function.

    Marissa I Boulware;Paul G Mermelstein

  • Calmodulin priming: Nuclear translocation of a calmodulin complex and the memory of prior neuronal activity

    Paul G. Mermelstein;Karl Deisseroth;Neela Dasgupta;Ann L. Isaksen

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Meisel
Robert L. Meisel University of Minnesota
Paul E. Micevych
Paul E. Micevych University of California, Los Angeles
Mark J. Thomas
Mark J. Thomas University of Minnesota
Richard W. Tsien
Richard W. Tsien New York University
Karl Deisseroth
Karl Deisseroth Stanford University
Jill B. Becker
Jill B. Becker University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Timothy J. Ebner
Timothy J. Ebner University of Minnesota
M. Foster Olive
M. Foster Olive Arizona State University
Marilyn E. Carroll
Marilyn E. Carroll University of Minnesota
Rebecca W. Doerge
Rebecca W. Doerge Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Neuroscience, exploring online education options can expand your skills and open new career doors. Many students ask what certifications can I get online that complement neuroscience studies or lead to high-paying roles in healthcare, research, or counseling.

If you are juggling work or family commitments, you may be looking for the easy degrees to get online. Certain fields related to neuroscience, such as psychology or behavioral science, offer online degree paths that may be less intensive while still providing valuable knowledge and credentials.

Budget is also a key consideration. If a career in social work aligns with your interests—such as supporting individuals with neurological conditions—it’s worth researching the most affordable online MSW programs. Similarly, those keen on behavioral therapy can explore BCBA accredited programs online to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst with flexible, cost-effective study options.

Online degrees and certifications can make neuroscience-related careers more accessible, affordable, and compatible with your life plans.

Best Scientists Citing Paul G. Mermelstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles