World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 82 1047 943 479 409 536 27467

David F. Stroncek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David F. Stroncek between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David F. Stroncek published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 14.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2023. 19 of the 683 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2023. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 47 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 2 publications
1981 2026

683 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David F. Stroncek: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 10
1994 3
1995 4
1996 10
1997 16
1998 6
1999 8
2000 9
2001 12
2002 15
2003 22
2004 18
2005 21
2006 19
2007 19
2008 19
2009 31
2010 21
2011 30
2012 20
2013 26
2014 19
2015 28
2016 35
2017 30
2018 25
2019 29
2020 33
2021 23
2022 23
2023 47
2024 19
2025 17
2026 2
Total 683
Download as CSV

David F. Stroncek publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Stroncek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 535–544 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 536 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14 536
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

David F. Stroncek D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Stroncek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47 82
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

David F. Stroncek is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology with a significant focus on oncology, genetics, immunology, molecular biology, and hematology as subfields of study.

The scientist has concentrated work on several main topics, including CAR-T cell therapy research, viral infectious diseases and gene expression in insects, immune cell function and interaction, virus-based gene therapy research, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, mesenchymal stem cell research, and immunotherapy and immune responses.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Stroncek are:

  • CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: Updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial (2020) - Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Long-Term Follow-Up of CD19-CAR T-Cell Therapy in Children and Young Adults With B-ALL (2021) - Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Safety and feasibility of anti-CD19 CAR T cells with fully human binding domains in patients with B-cell lymphoma (2020) - Nature Medicine
  • TCR-engineered T cells targeting E7 for patients with metastatic HPV-associated epithelial cancers (2021) - Nature Medicine
  • Characterization of HLH-like manifestations as a CRS variant in patients receiving CD22 CAR T cells (2021) - Blood

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Stroncek include:

  • Steven L. Highfill
  • Sandhya R. Panch
  • Ping Jin
  • Nirali N. Shah
  • Lipei Shao

The scientist has published extensively across several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Blood
  • Cytotherapy
  • Journal of Translational Medicine
  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Transfusion

Best Publications

  • CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy.

    Terry J Fry;Nirali N Shah;Rimas J Orentas;Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson

  • Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the national marrow donor program

    Nancy A. Kernan;Glenn Bartsch;Robert C. Ash;Patrick G. Beatty

  • Transfusion-related acute lung injury : Definition and review

    Pearl Toy;Mark A. Popovsky;Edward Abraham;Daniel R. Ambruso

  • T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of multiple myeloma

    Syed Abbas Ali;Victoria Shi;Irina Maric;Michael Wang

  • T Cells Genetically Modified to Express an Anti–B-Cell Maturation Antigen Chimeric Antigen Receptor Cause Remissions of Poor-Prognosis Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

    Jennifer N. Brudno;Irina Maric;Steven D. Hartman;Jeremy J. Rose

  • NAFLD causes selective CD4 + T lymphocyte loss and promotes hepatocarcinogenesis

    Chi Ma;Aparna H. Kesarwala;Tobias Eggert;José Medina-Echeverz

  • The association of biologically active lipids with the development of transfusion‐related acute lung injury: a retrospective study

    Christopher C. Silliman;Andrew J. Paterson;William O. Dickey;David F. Stroncek

  • International Society for Cellular Therapy perspective on immune functional assays for mesenchymal stromal cells as potency release criterion for advanced phase clinical trials

    Jacques Galipeau;Mauro Krampera;John Barrett;Francesco Dazzi

  • Complement activation and neutropenia occurring during cardiopulmonary bypass

    Dale E. Hammerschmidt;David F. Stroncek;Timothy K. Bowers;Carol J. Lammi-Keefe

  • CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: Updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial

    Nirali N. Shah;Steven L. Highfill;Haneen Shalabi;Bonnie Yates

  • Generation of clinical-grade CD19-specific CAR-modified CD8+ memory stem cells for the treatment of human B-cell malignancies.

    Marianna Sabatino;Jinhui Hu;Michele Sommariva;Michele Sommariva;Sanjivan Gautam

  • Long-Term Follow-Up of CD19-CAR T-Cell Therapy in Children and Young Adults With B-ALL.

    Nirali N Shah;Daniel W Lee;Bonnie Yates;Constance M Yuan

  • Prostaglandin E2 Enhances Human Cord Blood Stem Cell Xenotransplants and Shows Long-Term Safety in Preclinical Nonhuman Primate Transplant Models

    Wolfram Goessling;Robyn S. Allen;Xiao Guan;Ping Jin

  • Gene expression profiling of cutaneous wound healing.

    Kavita Deonarine;Monica C Panelli;Mitchell E Stashower;Ping Jin

  • Treatment of normal individuals with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: donor experiences and the effects on peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and on the collection of peripheral blood stem cells.

    D F Stroncek;M E Clay;M L Petzoldt;J Smith

  • Committee report. Nucleic acid amplification testing of blood donors for transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases: Report of the Interorganizational Task Force on Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing of Blood Donors.

    M P Busch;S H Kleinman;B Jackson;S L Stramer

  • Safety and feasibility of anti-CD19 CAR T cells with fully human binding domains in patients with B-cell lymphoma

    Jennifer N Brudno;Norris Lam;Danielle Vanasse;Yueh-Wei Shen

  • TCR-engineered T cells targeting E7 for patients with metastatic HPV-associated epithelial cancers.

    Nisha B. Nagarsheth;Scott M. Norberg;Andrew L. Sinkoe;Sabina Adhikary

  • Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation: considerations for donors

    Paolo Anderlini;Martin Körbling;David Dale;Alois Gratwohl

  • MicroRNA and gene expression patterns in the differentiation of human embryonic stem cells.

    Jiaqiang Ren;Ping Jin;Ena Wang;Francesco M Marincola

  • Future perspectives in melanoma research

    Paolo A. Ascierto;Sanjiv Agarwala;Gerardo Botti;Alessandra Cesano

  • Main roads to melanoma

    Giuseppe Palmieri;Mariaelena Capone;Maria Libera Ascierto;Giusy Gentilcore

  • Adverse reactions in patients transfused with cryopreserved marrow

    D. F. Stroncek;S. K. Fautsch;L. C. Lasky;D. D. Hurd

  • Cell and gene therapies: moving from research to clinic

    David F Stroncek;Raj K Puri

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco M. Marincola
Francesco M. Marincola National Institutes of Health
Susan F. Leitman
Susan F. Leitman National Institutes of Health
Ena Wang
Ena Wang Toro bio
Richard Childs
Richard Childs National Institutes of Health
Ronald E. Gress
Ronald E. Gress National Institutes of Health
Steven Z. Pavletic
Steven Z. Pavletic National Institutes of Health
Crystal L. Mackall
Crystal L. Mackall Stanford University
Terry J. Fry
Terry J. Fry University of Colorado Denver
Pamela Gehron Robey
Pamela Gehron Robey National Institutes of Health
James N. Kochenderfer
James N. Kochenderfer National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to varied healthcare-related careers. Beyond traditional lab roles, many graduates explore opportunities in health information management and medical coding, where their scientific background is valuable for handling clinical data.

For those interested in medical coding, obtaining a cpc certification salary and career paths provide insight into potential earnings and advancement. This certification is key for becoming a Certified Professional Coder, a role essential for accurate medical billing and compliance.

Alternatively, pursuing a degree focused on health data can lead to careers in managing patient information systems. Understanding the health information management degree salary landscape helps gauge long-term goals in this field.

When looking for quality programs, students should consider online health information management programs cahiim accredited, which ensure the education meets industry standards and supports career readiness.

For faster entry into the workforce, many choose a fast track medical billing and coding certificate online. These programs provide essential skills quickly and can complement a microbiology background for diverse career options.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Stroncek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles