World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 154 135 124 81 75 625 84460
Medicine 155 971 892 556 498 625 86383

Mary M. Horowitz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary M. Horowitz between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary M. Horowitz published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 17.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2016. 22 of the 711 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2016. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 16 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 19 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 26 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 2 publications
1987 2026

711 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary M. Horowitz: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 5
1989 16
1990 6
1991 9
1992 19
1993 15
1994 12
1995 10
1996 8
1997 16
1998 15
1999 10
2000 15
2001 11
2002 12
2003 15
2004 18
2005 19
2006 19
2007 26
2008 24
2009 26
2010 24
2011 21
2012 26
2013 23
2014 23
2015 27
2016 32
2017 26
2018 24
2019 18
2020 28
2021 25
2022 18
2023 28
2024 18
2025 20
2026 2
Total 711
Download as CSV

Mary M. Horowitz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 621–640 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 625 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386 625
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Mary M. Horowitz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary M. Horowitz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 154–155 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 155 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87 155
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2019 - Harriet P. Dustan Award, American College of Physicians (ACP) for outstanding science related to medicine
  • 2019 - Lifetime Achievement in Science Award, Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Foundation
  • 2019 - Lifetime Achievement in Science Award, Aplastic Anemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Foundation
  • 2019 - Harriet P. Dustan Award, American College of Physicians (ACP) for outstanding science related to medicine
  • 2014 - Lifetime Achievement Award, American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • 2014 - Lifetime Achievement Award, American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • 2010 - Mentor Award for Clinical Science, American Society of Hematology
  • 2010 - Mentor Award for Clinical Science, American Society of Hematology
  • 2008 - KMS Mechtild Harf Science Award for advancing unrelated donor transplantation
  • 2008 - KMS Mechtild Harf Science Award for advancing unrelated donor transplantation

Overview

Mary M. Horowitz is affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine with significant contributions in hematology, oncology, and public health. Their work spans several specialized subfields including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, CAR-T cell therapy, renal transplantation outcomes, polyomavirus-related diseases, and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research.

Horowitz has published extensively, with a notable presence in several scientific journals. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • Blood
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Their recent papers cover key topics in hematopoietic transplantation and lymphoma treatment. Selected papers include:

  • Current Use of and Trends in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in the United States (2020, Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation)
  • Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide-Based Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis (2023, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Real-world evidence of tisagenlecleucel for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (2020, Blood Advances)
  • One and a half million hematopoietic stem cell transplants: continuous and differential improvement in worldwide access with the use of non-identical family donors (2021, Haematologica)
  • Double unrelated umbilical cord blood vs HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: the BMT CTN 1101 trial (2020, Blood)

Mary M. Horowitz collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Their most common coauthors are:

  • Brent R. Logan
  • Steven M. Devine
  • Wael Saber
  • Bronwen E. Shaw
  • Mehdi Hamadani

The main areas of study that Horowitz contributes to reflect a strong focus on improving outcomes and treatment strategies in hematology and oncology, particularly through stem cell transplantation techniques and graft-versus-host disease management.

Best Publications

  • Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation

    MM Horowitz;RP Gale;PM Sondel;JM Goldman

  • Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.

    Andrea Bacigalupo;Karen Ballen;Doug Rizzo;Sergio Giralt

  • Evolving concepts in the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Giuseppe Saglio;John Goldman;Andreas Hochhaus

  • Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: An Update of Concepts and Management Recommendations of European LeukemiaNet

    Michele Baccarani;Jorge Cortes;Fabrizio Pane;Dietger Niederwieser

  • Outcomes after transplantation of cord Blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with leukemia

    Mary J. Laughlin;Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein;John E. Wagner

  • High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation.

    Stephanie J. Lee;John Klein;Michael Haagenson;Lee Ann Baxter-Lowe

  • Lenalidomide after stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

    Philip L. McCarthy;Kouros Owzar;Craig C. Hofmeister;David D. Hurd

  • Graft-versus-host disease in children who have received a cord-blood or bone marrow transplant from an HLA-identical sibling. Eurocord and International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Working Committee on Alternative Donor and Stem Cell Sources.

    Vanderson Rocha;John E. Wagner;Kathleen A. Sobocinski;John P. Klein

  • HLA Match Likelihoods for Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Grafts in the U.S. Registry

    Loren Gragert;Mary Eapen;Eric Williams;John Freeman

  • Solid Cancers after Bone Marrow Transplantation

    Rochelle E. Curtis;Philip A. Rowlings;H. Joachim Deeg;Donna A. Shriner

  • Bone marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase. Increased risk for relapse associated with T-cell depletion.

    John M. Goldman;Robert Peter Gale;Mary M. Horowitz;James C. Biggs

  • Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study

    Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein;Mei Jie Zhang;Cladd Stevens

  • Peripheral-Blood Stem Cells versus Bone Marrow from Unrelated Donors

    Claudio Anasetti;Brent R. Logan;Stephanie J. Lee;Edmund K. Waller

  • Impact of HLA class I and class II high-resolution matching on outcomes of unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: HLA-C mismatching is associated with a strong adverse effect on transplantation outcome.

    Neal Flomenberg;Lee Ann Baxter-Lowe;Dennis Confer;Marcelo Fernandez-Vina

  • T-cell depletion of HLA-identical transplants in leukemia.

    AM Marmont;MM Horowitz;RP Gale;K Sobocinski

  • Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research.

    Sergio Giralt;Karen Ballen;Douglas Rizzo;Andreas Bacigalupo

  • A decision analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the myelodysplastic syndromes: delayed transplantation for low-risk myelodysplasia is associated with improved outcome

    Corey S. Cutler;Stephanie J. Lee;Peter Greenberg;H. Joachim Deeg

  • Validation and refinement of the Disease Risk Index for allogeneic stem cell transplantation

    Philippe Armand;Haesook T. Kim;Brent R. Logan;Zhiwei Wang

  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective

    Alois Gratwohl;Helen Baldomero;Mahmoud Aljurf;Marcelo C. Pasquini

  • Oral Mucositis and the Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation

    Stephen T. Sonis;Gerry Oster;Hank Fuchs;Lisa Bellm

Frequent Co-Authors

Mei-Jie Zhang
Mei-Jie Zhang Medical College of Wisconsin
Daniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf University of Minnesota
Brent R. Logan
Brent R. Logan Medical College of Wisconsin
Marcelo C. Pasquini
Marcelo C. Pasquini Medical College of Wisconsin
John P. Klein
John P. Klein Medical College of Wisconsin
Stephanie J. Lee
Stephanie J. Lee Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Joseph H. Antin
Joseph H. Antin Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Sergio Giralt
Sergio Giralt Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John R. Wingard
John R. Wingard University of Florida
Richard E. Champlin
Richard E. Champlin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of online healthcare degrees, each offering distinct entry requirements and career opportunities. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials, finding the cheapest online dnp programs can make pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice more accessible and affordable.

Aspiring nurses and working professionals looking for a fast-track to better roles may consider the cheapest bsn programs. These online Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) options offer flexibility and cost savings, making them ideal for part-time students and career changers alike.

Individuals without a nursing background also have opportunities through online programs. Options like non nursing bachelor’s to msn online allow those with degrees in other fields to pursue a Master’s in Nursing quickly and efficiently. Additionally, online bsn programs for non nurses can provide a direct pathway into nursing, eliminating the need for a prior nursing degree.

These varied online pathways cater to learners from all backgrounds, supporting both career growth and transitions within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Mary M. Horowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles