World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
40745
World Ranking
8848
National Ranking
4558

John P. Klein publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Klein sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 300 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John P. Klein D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John P. Klein sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John P. Klein was affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in the United States. Their research spanned a multidisciplinary range that prominently included Medicine and Computer Science.

The main areas of study for Klein's work included Medicine with 34 publications and Computer Science with 14 publications. Subfields within these encompassed Artificial Intelligence, Surgery, Hepatology, Epidemiology, and Molecular Biology. Their research covered specific topics such as Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment, Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, AI in cancer detection, and Medical Image Segmentation Techniques.

Klein contributed to multiple peer-reviewed venues with a noted frequency in the following journals and platforms:

  • The Journal of Urology (6 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (5 publications)
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology (3 publications)
  • UNC Libraries (2 publications)
  • European Urology (2 publications)

The scientist regularly collaborated with several coauthors, including Shawn Marhamati (8 papers), Inderjit Singh (7 papers), Rosie Foucault (5 papers), Anouk Leathead (5 papers), and John Sioufi (5 papers).

Among Klein's recent published papers, the following titles, years, and venues are of note:

  • Model-Driven Engineering: Automatic Code Generation and Beyond, 2023, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Hepatic Resection as the Primary Treatment Method for Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation, 2024, Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • Next-generation cell line selection methodology leveraging data lakes, natural language generation and advanced data analytics, 2023, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Combination Prostatic Artery Embolization Prior to Water-Jet Ablation (Aquablation) for Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy: A Propensity Score Analysis, 2024, Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Architecting complex, long-lived scientific software, 2023, Journal of Systems and Software

Best Publications

  • Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data

    John P. Klein;Melvin L. Moeschberger

  • High-resolution donor-recipient HLA matching contributes to the success of unrelated donor marrow transplantation.

    Stephanie J. Lee;John Klein;Michael Haagenson;Lee Ann Baxter-Lowe

  • Graft-versus-host disease in children who have received a cord-blood or bone marrow transplant from an HLA-identical sibling. Eurocord and International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Working Committee on Alternative Donor and Stem Cell Sources.

    Vanderson Rocha;John E. Wagner;Kathleen A. Sobocinski;John P. Klein

  • Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study

    Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein;Mei Jie Zhang;Cladd Stevens

  • Long-term survival and late deaths after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Late Effects Working Committee of the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry.

    G Socié;J V Stone;J R Wingard;D Weisdorf

  • A decision analysis of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for the myelodysplastic syndromes: delayed transplantation for low-risk myelodysplasia is associated with improved outcome

    Corey S. Cutler;Stephanie J. Lee;Peter Greenberg;H. Joachim Deeg

  • IBMTR Severity INDEX FOR GRADING ACUTE GRAFT‐VERSUS‐HOST DISEASE: RETROSPECTIVE COMPARISON WITH GLUCKSBERG GRADE

    Rowlings Pa;Przepiorka D;Klein Jp;Gale Rp

  • Bone marrow transplantation for leukemia following a new busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen

    Peter J. Tutschka;Edward A. Copelan;John P. Klein

  • Blood stem cells compared with bone marrow as a source of hematopoietic cells for allogeneic transplantation

    Richard E. Champlin;Norbert Schmitz;Mary M. Horowitz;Bernard Chapuis

  • Donor selection for natural killer cell receptor genes leads to superior survival after unrelated transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    Sarah Cooley;Daniel J. Weisdorf;Lisbeth A. Guethlein;John P. Klein

  • Severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease: association with treatment-related mortality and relapse

    Stephanie J. Lee;John P. Klein;A. John Barrett;Olle Ringden

  • Results of Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplants for Leukemia Using Donors Other Than HLA-Identical Siblings

    R Szydlo;J M Goldman;J P Klein;R P Gale

  • Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm.

    John P. Klein

  • Donors with group B KIR haplotypes improve relapse-free survival after unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    Sarah A Cooley;Elizabeth Trachtenberg;Tracy L. Bergemann;Koy Saeteurn

  • Hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute leukemia in relapse or primary induction failure

    Michel Duval;John P. Klein;Wensheng He;Jean Yves Cahn

  • Regression Modeling of Competing Risks Data Based on Pseudovalues of the Cumulative Incidence Function

    John P. Klein;Per Kragh Andersen

  • High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America.

    K. H. Antman;P. A. Rowlings;W. P. Vaughan;C. J. Pelz

  • Analyzing survival curves at a fixed point in time.

    John P Klein;Brent Logan;Mette Harhoff;Per Kragh Andersen

  • Donor selection for natural killer cell receptor genes leads to superior survival after unrelated transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia

    S Cooley;DJ Weisdorf;LA Guethlein;JP Klein

  • Outcomes of transplantation of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood and bone marrow in children with acute leukaemia: a comparison study. Editorial comment

    Vanderson Rocha;Eliane Gluckman;Mary Eapen;Pablo Rubinstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Mary M. Horowitz
Mary M. Horowitz Medical College of Wisconsin
Mei-Jie Zhang
Mei-Jie Zhang Medical College of Wisconsin
Daniel J. Weisdorf
Daniel J. Weisdorf University of Minnesota
Stephanie J. Lee
Stephanie J. Lee Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Effie W. Petersdorf
Effie W. Petersdorf University of Washington
Hillard M. Lazarus
Hillard M. Lazarus Case Western Reserve University
Stephen R. Spellman
Stephen R. Spellman Medical College of Wisconsin
Richard E. Champlin
Richard E. Champlin The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Navneet S. Majhail
Navneet S. Majhail Cleveland Clinic
Joseph H. Antin
Joseph H. Antin Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Alongside traditional medical degrees, there are flexible online programs that open doors to in-demand healthcare careers. For instance, pharmacists are vital members of the healthcare team, and those looking for advanced training can explore pharmd online programs to achieve a doctoral degree from home.

With the growing importance of digital health records, health informatics degrees offer an exciting path at the intersection of healthcare and technology. These programs train students in managing patient data and improving administrative efficiency.

For those interested in the administrative side of medicine, medical billing and coding cost is an important consideration. Affordable online courses can prepare you for this critical role, ensuring smooth financial operations in healthcare facilities.

If you want to provide patient care in a clinical setting, becoming an advanced practice nurse is a rewarding choice. The cheapest online nurse practitioner programs allow you to gain specialized skills while balancing work and study.

These diverse online pathways make healthcare careers more accessible, helping you contribute to the field in ways beyond a traditional MD degree.

Best Scientists Citing John P. Klein

Recently Published Articles