World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13664
World Ranking
4045
National Ranking
1924

Amin Saberi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amin Saberi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Amin Saberi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amin Saberi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Amin Saberi is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has published extensively in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Cognitive Neuroscience, Management Science and Operations Research, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main research topics covered by Amin Saberi include:

  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Amin Saberi's recent papers demonstrate a range of interdisciplinary interests bridging computational methods and neuroscience as well as clinical research:

  • The Accuracy of Visceral Adiposity Index for the Screening of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021), published in International Journal of Endocrinology
  • Evaluation of curcumin as add-on therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial (2022), published in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
  • ENIGMA-Sleep: Challenges, opportunities, and the road map (2021), published in Journal of Sleep Research
  • Convergent regional brain abnormalities in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: A neuroimaging meta-analysis of 73 studies (2022), published in Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Structural and functional neuroimaging of late-life depression: a coordinate-based meta-analysis (2021), published in Brain Imaging and Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amin Saberi include:

  • Simon B. Eickhoff
  • Sofie L. Valk
  • Rad Niazadeh
  • David Wajc
  • Boris C. Bernhardt

Publication venues where Amin Saberi frequently contributes are diverse and include both preprint servers and peer-reviewed journals:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Operations Research
  • Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Amin Saberi has been recognized with the award of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2010.

Best Publications

  • AdWords and generalized online matching

    Aranyak Mehta;Amin Saberi;Umesh Vazirani;Vijay Vazirani

  • Random walks in peer-to-peer networks

    C. Gkantsidis;M. Mihail;A. Saberi

  • Minimizing Effective Resistance of a Graph

    Arpita Ghosh;Stephen Boyd;Amin Saberi

  • On approximately fair allocations of indivisible goods

    R. J. Lipton;E. Markakis;E. Mossel;A. Saberi

  • Greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor-revealing LP

    Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Evangelos Markakis;Amin Saberi

  • A new greedy approach for facility location problems

    Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Amin Saberi

  • The spread of innovations in social networks

    Andrea Montanari;Amin Saberi

  • An O(log n/log log n)-Approximation Algorithm for the Asymmetric Traveling Salesman Problem

    Arash Asadpour;Michel X. Goemans;Aleksander Mądry;Shayan Oveis Gharan

  • AdWords and generalized on-line matching

    A. Mehta;A. Saberi;U. Vazirani;V. Vazirani

  • An Approximation Algorithm for Max-Min Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods

    Arash Asadpour;Amin Saberi

  • Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents

    Ercan Yildiz;Asuman Ozdaglar;Daron Acemoglu;Amin Saberi

  • Hybrid search schemes for unstructured peer-to-peer networks

    C. Gkantsidis;M. Mihail;A. Saberi

  • Approximation Algorithms for Computing Maximin Share Allocations

    Georgios Amanatidis;Evangelos Markakis;Afshin Nikzad;Amin Saberi

  • Random walks in peer-to-peer networks: algorithms and evaluation

    Christos Gkantsidis;Milena Mihail;Amin Saberi

  • Online Stochastic Matching: Online Actions Based on Offline Statistics

    Vahideh H. Manshadi;Shayan Oveis Gharan;Amin Saberi

  • Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian

  • On the spread of viruses on the internet

    Noam Berger;Christian Borgs;Jennifer T. Chayes;Amin Saberi

  • Market equilibrium via a primal--dual algorithm for a convex program

    Nikhil R. Devanur;Christos H. Papadimitriou;Amin Saberi;Vijay V. Vazirani

  • Message-Passing Algorithms for Sparse Network Alignment

    Mohsen Bayati;David F. Gleich;Amin Saberi;Ying Wang

  • A Randomized Rounding Approach to the Traveling Salesman Problem

    Shayan Oveis Gharan;Amin Saberi;Mohit Singh

  • Market equilibrium via a primal-dual-type algorithm

    N.R. Devanur;C.H. Papadimitriou;A. Saberi;V.V. Vazirani

  • An O(log n/log log n)-approximation algorithm for the asymmetric traveling salesman problem

    Arash Asadpour;Michel X. Goemans;Aleksander Madry;Shayan Oveis Gharan

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohammad Mahdian
Mohammad Mahdian Google (United States)
Vijay V. Vazirani
Vijay V. Vazirani University of California, Irvine
Yinyu Ye
Yinyu Ye Stanford University
David F. Gleich
David F. Gleich Purdue University West Lafayette
Christos Gkantsidis
Christos Gkantsidis Microsoft (United States)
Jennifer Chayes
Jennifer Chayes University of California, Berkeley
Christian Borgs
Christian Borgs University of California, Berkeley
Christos H. Papadimitriou
Christos H. Papadimitriou Columbia University
Kamal Jain
Kamal Jain Microsoft (United States)
Anna Scaglione
Anna Scaglione Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the right college programs is a crucial step for anyone interested in computer science. Many students today are choosing flexible and accessible online degrees, which can open up a variety of career pathways within the tech industry.

For those seeking advanced education without a heavy workload, reviewing the easiest online masters can be a smart strategy. These programs often offer more manageable coursework and accelerated options, helping you balance studies with work or other commitments.

Cost is a significant consideration for many. Thankfully, there are affordable phd programs online that make it possible to earn a doctorate without taking on excessive debt. These options are ideal for professionals looking to further their expertise in the field.

If you're interested in leadership or educational roles, exploring the online edd degrees can help you reach your goals faster through fast-track, flexible programs.

Best Scientists Citing Amin Saberi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles