World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
10901
World Ranking
3693
National Ranking
1762

Mohammad Mahdian publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Mahdian sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mohammad Mahdian D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohammad Mahdian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mohammad Mahdian is a researcher affiliated with Google in the United States, with a primary focus on computer science. Their scholarly work spans 31 publications, contributing extensively to various subfields including artificial intelligence, management science and operations research, signal processing, marketing, and computer networks and communications.

Their research topics encompass a wide range of areas, notably data management and algorithms, auction theory and applications, privacy-preserving technologies in data, consumer market behavior and pricing, complexity and algorithms in graphs, advanced clustering algorithms, and advanced bandit algorithms.

Mahdian's recent publications illustrate the thematic breadth and interdisciplinary nature of their work:

  • Budget-Management Strategies in Repeated Auctions, 2021, Operations Research
  • Fair Hierarchical Clustering, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Auto-Bidding and Auctions in Online Advertising: A Survey, 2024, ACM SIGecom Exchanges
  • Fair Correlation Clustering, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Hierarchical Clustering via Sketches and Hierarchical Correlation Clustering, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Throughout their career, Mahdian has regularly published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), ACM SIGecom Exchanges, Operations Research, and Mathematics of Operations Research. Their body of work includes 13 publications in arXiv, reflecting an active engagement with open-access scholarly dissemination.

In collaborative research, Mahdian frequently coauthors with several scholars, including:

  • Vahab Mirrokni (12 joint publications)
  • Alessandro Epasto (8 joint publications)
  • Jieming Mao (5 joint publications)
  • Santiago Balseiro (4 joint publications)
  • Yuan Deng (3 joint publications)

This extensive collaboration network supports research spanning multiple dimensions of computer science and operations research. Mahdian's work addresses theoretical and applied aspects in areas such as auctions, clustering algorithms, and privacy technologies, contributing to an understanding of consumer markets and algorithmic complexity.

Best Publications

  • Influence and correlation in social networks

    Aris Anagnostopoulos;Ravi Kumar;Mohammad Mahdian

  • Greedy facility location algorithms analyzed using dual fitting with factor-revealing LP

    Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Evangelos Markakis;Amin Saberi

  • A new greedy approach for facility location problems

    Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Amin Saberi

  • Limitations of cross-monotonic cost-sharing schemes

    Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian;Vahab S. Mirrokni

  • Marriage, honesty, and stability

    Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian

  • Comparing and aggregating rankings with ties

    Ronald Fagin;Ravi Kumar;Mohammad Mahdian;D. Sivakumar

  • Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Kamal Jain

  • Improved Approximation Algorithms for Metric Facility Location Problems

    Mohammad Mahdian;Yinyu Ye;Jiawei Zhang

  • Online bipartite matching with random arrivals: an approach based on strongly factor-revealing LPs

    Mohammad Mahdian;Qiqi Yan

  • Tolls for heterogeneous selfish users in multicommodity networks and generalized congestion games

    L. Fleischer;K. Jain;M. Mahdian

  • Packing Steiner trees

    Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Mohammad R. Salavatipour

  • Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian

  • Approximation Algorithms for Metric Facility Location Problems

    Mohammad Mahdian;Yinyu Ye;Jiawei Zhang

  • Suggesting contacts for social networks

    Malcolm Slaney;Alex Jaffe;Shanmugasundaram Ravikumar;Aris Anagnostopoulos

  • A Cascade Model for Externalities in Sponsored Search

    David Kempe;Mohammad Mahdian

  • Comparing Partial Rankings

    Ronald Fagin;Ravi Kumar;Mohammad Mahdian;D. Sivakumar

  • Allocating online advertisement space with unreliable estimates

    Mohammad Mahdian;Hamid Nazerzadeh;Amin Saberi

  • Online auctions with re-usable goods

    Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi

  • Optimizing the placement of Internet TAPs in wireless neighborhood networks

    R. Chandra;Lili Qiu;K. Jain;M. Mahdian

  • Click fraud resistant methods for learning click-through rates

    Nicole Immorlica;Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Kunal Talwar

  • Dynamics of conversations

    Ravi Kumar;Mohammad Mahdian;Mary McGlohon

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicole Immorlica
Nicole Immorlica Microsoft (United States)
Kamal Jain
Kamal Jain Microsoft (United States)
Jennifer Chayes
Jennifer Chayes University of California, Berkeley
Christian Borgs
Christian Borgs University of California, Berkeley
Ravi Kumar
Ravi Kumar Google (United States)
Amin Saberi
Amin Saberi Stanford University
Vahab Mirrokni
Vahab Mirrokni Google (United States)
Uriel Feige
Uriel Feige Weizmann Institute of Science
Sergei Vassilvitskii
Sergei Vassilvitskii Google (United States)
Ranveer Chandra
Ranveer Chandra Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science is just the beginning. Many students considering a technology career also look at related disciplines, such as electrical engineering. For those interested in a flexible path, there are top online electrical engineering schools in the USA that offer strong online programs, opening doors to specialized engineering roles.

Earning industry-recognized certifications can boost your career and salary potential, even before or after completing a degree. There are many certifications that pay well and can be completed online in a short time frame—ideal for building practical skills alongside your studies.

If you’re aiming to advance your education quickly, you may want to explore the fastest masters degree online options. These programs let you develop advanced expertise while managing work or personal commitments.

Not sure which graduate program aligns with your career goals? Discovering what masters program should I do can help you identify high-demand fields that offer strong job prospects and competitive salaries.

Best Scientists Citing Mohammad Mahdian

Trending Scientists