World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
7150
World Ranking
6259
National Ranking
2798

Marek Chrobak publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Chrobak sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 238 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marek Chrobak D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Chrobak sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marek Chrobak is affiliated with the University of California, Riverside in the United States. Their research contributions are primarily situated within the fields of Computer Science and Engineering.

The scientist's main areas of study include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Information Systems

The research topics covered by their work span:

  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Optimization and Search Problems
  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Advanced Wireless Network Optimization

Marek Chrobak's recent papers provide insight into their current research foci. Notable publications include:

  • A Simple Algorithm for Optimal Search Trees with Two-way Comparisons, 2021, published in ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • Online Algorithms for Multilevel Aggregation, 2020, published in Operations Research
  • A φ-Competitive Algorithm for Scheduling Packets with Deadlines, 2022, published in SIAM Journal on Computing
  • New results on multi-level aggregation, 2021, published in Theoretical Computer Science
  • Online Paging with Heterogeneous Cache Slots, 2024, published in Algorithmica

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theoretical Computer Science
  • ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • Algorithmica
  • Information and Computation

Collaborations have included frequent co-authors such as:

  • Neal E. Young
  • Huong Luu
  • Sunny Atalig
  • Mordecai J. Golin
  • Jiřı́ Sgall

Best Publications

  • New results on server problems

    M. Chrobak;H. Karloff;T. Payne;S. Vishwanathan

  • Fast broadcasting and gossiping in radio networks

    Marek Chrobak;Leszek Gasieniec;Wojciech Rytter

  • Finite automata and unary languages

    M Chrobak

  • Fast broadcasting and gossiping in radio networks

    M. Chrobak;L. Gasieniec;W. Rytter

  • A linear-time algorithm for drawing a planar graph on a grid

    M. Chrobak;T. H. Payne

  • An optimal on-line algorithm for K-servers on trees

    Marek Chrobak;Lawrence L. Larmore

  • Convex grid drawings of 3-connected planar graphs

    Marek Chrobak;Goos Kant

  • Dynamic Thermal Management through Task Scheduling

    Jun Yang;Xiuyi Zhou;M. Chrobak;Youtao Zhang

  • Analysis of Bacterial Community Composition by Oligonucleotide Fingerprinting of rRNA Genes

    Lea Valinsky;Gianluca Della Vedova;Alexandra J. Scupham;Sam Alvey

  • Reconstructing hv-convex polyominoes from orthogonal projections

    Marek Chrobak;Christoph Dürr

  • Competitive analysis of randomized paging algorithms

    Dimitris Achlioptas;Marek Chrobak;John Noga

  • Planar orientations with low out-degree and compaction of adjacency matrices

    Marek Chrobak;David Eppstein

  • The Server Problem and On-Line Games.

    Marek Chrobak;Lawrence L. Larmore

  • LRU Is Better than FIFO

    Marek Chrobak;John Noga

  • Reducing large internet topologies for faster simulations

    V. Krishnamurthy;M. Faloutsos;M. Chrobak;L. Lao

  • Convex drawings of graphs in two and three dimensions (preliminary version)

    Marek Chrobak;Michael T. Goodrich;Roberto Tamassia

  • Minimum-width grid drawings of plane graphs

    Marek Chrobak;Shin-Ichi Nakano

  • Probe selection algorithms with applications in the analysis of microbial communities.

    James Borneman;Marek Chrobak;Gianluca Della Vedova;Andres Figueroa

  • On some packing problem related to dynamic storage allocation

    Marek Chrobak;Maciej Ślusarek

  • The Wake-Up Problem in MultiHop Radio Networks

    Marek Chrobak;Leszek Ga¸sieniec;Dariusz R. Kowalski

  • Reconstructing hv-Convex Polyominoes from Orthogonal Projections

    Christoph Durr;Marek Chrobak

  • Online competitive algorithms for maximizing weighted throughput of unit jobs

    Yair Bartall;Francis Y. L. Chin;Marek Chrobak;Stanley P. Y. Fung

Frequent Co-Authors

Jiří Sgall
Jiří Sgall Charles University
Neal E. Young
Neal E. Young University of California, Riverside
Wojciech Rytter
Wojciech Rytter University of Warsaw
Leszek Gasieniec
Leszek Gasieniec University of Liverpool
Gerhard J. Woeginger
Gerhard J. Woeginger RWTH Aachen University
Claire Kenyon
Claire Kenyon Brown University
James Borneman
James Borneman University of California, Riverside
J. Ian Munro
J. Ian Munro University of Waterloo
Francis Y. L. Chin
Francis Y. L. Chin University of Hong Kong
Dariusz R. Kowalski
Dariusz R. Kowalski Augusta University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Computer Science doesn't always require a lengthy or expensive commitment. For students seeking flexible options, there are a wide variety of online programs tailored to fit different career goals and budgets.

For those interested in combining technical and business skills, exploring the cheapest mba programs can be a smart step. These MBA degrees help computer science professionals move into leadership and management roles without breaking the bank.

If you’re looking to fast-track your education, consider one of the 1 year masters programs in related fields. These accelerated options allow you to earn a graduate degree quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Alternatively, programs listed among fast degrees online can open doors to well-paying tech jobs with a shorter time investment.

With AI playing a crucial role in modern computing, you might also want to investigate the best online ai degrees for specialized skills that are increasingly in demand.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Chrobak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles