World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
11780
World Ranking
6377
National Ranking
2847

Nicole Immorlica publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole Immorlica sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nicole Immorlica D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicole Immorlica sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Nicole Immorlica is a researcher affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their academic work primarily focuses on decision sciences, with a significant emphasis on management science and operations research. Their contributions extend into related subfields such as economics and econometrics, computer networks and communications, sociology and political science, and marketing.

The topics covered in their research include auction theory and applications, game theory and voting systems, optimization and search problems, consumer market behavior and pricing, experimental behavioral economics studies, and advanced bandit algorithms research.

They have published numerous papers in various venues. Some notable recent papers include:

  • Information Acquisition in Matching Markets: The Role of Price Discovery (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)
  • A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for an Additive Buyer (2020, Journal of the ACM)
  • When to Be Agile: Ratings and Version Updates in Mobile Apps (2021, Management Science)
  • Adversarial Bandits with Knapsacks (2022, Journal of the ACM)
  • The Role of Referrals in Inequality, Immobility, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)

Frequent co-authors working with Nicole Immorlica include Brendan Lucier, Aleksandrs Slivkins, Lukas Bolte, Matthew O. Jackson, and Katrina Ligett.

Their publications appear predominantly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • ACM SIGecom Exchanges
  • Journal of the ACM

Nicole Immorlica has been recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation since 2012.

Best Publications

  • Locality-sensitive hashing scheme based on p-stable distributions

    Mayur Datar;Nicole Immorlica;Piotr Indyk;Vahab S. Mirrokni

  • Power optimization in fault-tolerant topology control algorithms for wireless multi-hop networks

    Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi;Nicole Immorlica;Vahab S. Mirrokni

  • Correlation clustering in general weighted graphs

    Erik D. Demaine;Dotan Emanuel;Amos Fiat;Nicole Immorlica

  • Limitations of cross-monotonic cost-sharing schemes

    Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian;Vahab S. Mirrokni

  • Marriage, honesty, and stability

    Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian

  • Matroids, secretary problems, and online mechanisms

    Moshe Babaioff;Nicole Immorlica;Robert Kleinberg

  • Dynamics of bid optimization in online advertisement auctions

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Kamal Jain

  • Semantic similarity between search engine queries using temporal correlation

    Steve Chien;Nicole Immorlica

  • Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Mohammad Mahdian

  • A Knapsack Secretary Problem with Applications

    Moshe Babaioff;Nicole Immorlica;David Kempe;Robert Kleinberg

  • A Simple and Approximately Optimal Mechanism for an Additive Buyer

    Moshe Babaioff;Nicole Immorlica;Brendan Lucier;S. Matthew Weinberg

  • A first look at peer-to-peer worms: threats and defenses

    Lidong Zhou;Lintao Zhang;Frank McSherry;Nicole Immorlica

  • Online auctions and generalized secretary problems

    Moshe Babaioff;Nicole Immorlica;David Kempe;Robert Kleinberg

  • On the costs and benefits of procrastination: approximation algorithms for stochastic combinatorial optimization problems

    Nicole Immorlica;David Karger;Maria Minkoff;Vahab S. Mirrokni

  • Click fraud resistant methods for learning click-through rates

    Nicole Immorlica;Kamal Jain;Mohammad Mahdian;Kunal Talwar

  • Correlation Clustering with Partial Information

    Erik D. Demaine;Nicole Immorlica

  • Decoupled classifiers for fair and efficient machine learning

    Cynthia Dwork;Nicole Immorlica;Adam Tauman Kalai;Mark D. M. Leiserson

  • The myth of the Folk Theorem

    Christian Borgs;Jennifer T. Chayes;Nicole Immorlica;Adam Tauman Kalai

  • The Disparate Effects of Strategic Manipulation

    Lily Hu;Nicole Immorlica;Jennifer Wortman Vaughan

  • Coordination mechanisms for selfish scheduling

    Nicole Immorlica;Li (Erran) Li;Vahab S. Mirrokni;Andreas S. Schulz

  • Coordination mechanisms for selfish scheduling

    Vahab Mirrokni;Li Li;Nicole Immorlica;Andreas S. Schulz

Frequent Co-Authors

Vahab Mirrokni
Vahab Mirrokni Google (United States)
Mohammad Mahdian
Mohammad Mahdian Google (United States)
Jennifer Chayes
Jennifer Chayes University of California, Berkeley
Christian Borgs
Christian Borgs University of California, Berkeley
Robert Kleinberg
Robert Kleinberg Cornell University
Adam Tauman Kalai
Adam Tauman Kalai Microsoft (United States)
Kamal Jain
Kamal Jain Microsoft (United States)
Uriel Feige
Uriel Feige Weizmann Institute of Science
Aleksandrs Slivkins
Aleksandrs Slivkins Microsoft (United States)
Jason D. Hartline
Jason D. Hartline Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of computer science is closely linked with a variety of other online degrees and certifications that can expand your career options. Many students choose to combine their CS studies with related disciplines, gaining specialized skills that are in high demand.

For example, a best online physics degree sharpens analytical thinking and problem-solving, which are highly valued in technology sectors. Likewise, data science programs integrate computer science with advanced data analysis, opening doors to lucrative roles in data analytics and AI.

Some students pursue engineering routes, such as studying at top online electrical engineering schools, to specialize in hardware, robotics, or embedded systems—a perfect complement to core CS knowledge.

For a quicker path to employment, consider adding quick certifications that pay well to your resume. These certifications cover skills like cybersecurity, cloud computing, and coding, often requiring less time and offering excellent salary potential.

Exploring these related online degrees and certifications can help you stand out and create a more flexible, rewarding career pathway in technology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Nicole Immorlica

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles