D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 32 Citations 4,884 116 World Ranking 4120 National Ranking 281

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Linguistics
  • Law
  • Social science

Michael Haugh spends much of his time researching Linguistics, Politeness, Pragmatics, Politeness theory and Face. The concepts of his Linguistics study are interwoven with issues in Officer and Appeal. As part of his studies on Politeness, Michael Haugh often connects relevant subjects like Conversation analysis.

His studies deal with areas such as Epistemology, Action, Social actions and Australian English as well as Pragmatics. His Politeness theory research incorporates elements of Sociolinguistics, Politeness maxims and Applied linguistics. His research in Face intersects with topics in Cross-cultural, Face-to-face interaction and Media studies.

His most cited work include:

  • The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative (189 citations)
  • Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face (132 citations)
  • Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English (119 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Michael Haugh focuses on Linguistics, Politeness, Pragmatics, Social psychology and Face. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Communication and Linguistics. His Politeness study combines topics in areas such as Interpersonal communication, Context and Emic and etic.

His study focuses on the intersection of Pragmatics and fields such as Epistemology with connections in the field of Social science and Identity. Michael Haugh works mostly in the field of Social psychology, limiting it down to concerns involving Action and, occasionally, Accountability. His Face study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Gender studies and Media studies.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Linguistics (50.66%)
  • Politeness (40.13%)
  • Pragmatics (26.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?

  • Linguistics (50.66%)
  • Politeness (40.13%)
  • Pragmatics (26.97%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Linguistics, Politeness, Pragmatics, Social psychology and Metapragmatics. Michael Haugh combines subjects such as Situated and Communication with his study of Linguistics. Specifically, his work in Politeness is concerned with the study of Politeness theory.

His Pragmatics research includes elements of Field and Negotiation. His Social psychology research includes themes of Action, Brazilian Portuguese, Portuguese, Voice and Conversation analysis. The study incorporates disciplines such as Lexicon and Metalanguage in addition to Metapragmatics.

Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (35 citations)
  • Joint fantasising as relational practice in Brazilian Portuguese interactions (17 citations)
  • Getting to know you: Teasing as an invitation to intimacy in initial interactions: (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Linguistics
  • Law
  • Social science

His primary scientific interests are in Politeness, Linguistics, Social psychology, Action and Pragmatics. His studies deal with areas such as Space, Field and Focus as well as Politeness. His Linguistics study typically links adjacent topics like Interpersonal communication.

His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Variation, Cultural group selection, Perception and Australian English. His Action research integrates issues from Ascription, American English and Situational ethics. The various areas that Michael Haugh examines in his Pragmatics study include Brother and Politeness theory.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative

Michael Bevan Haugh.
Journal of Politeness Research-language Behaviour Culture (2007)

418 Citations

Face in interaction

Michael Bevan Haugh;Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini.
Journal of Pragmatics (2010)

250 Citations

Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face

Michael Bevan Haugh.
Journal of Pragmatics (2010)

238 Citations

Pragmatics and the English Language

Jonathan Culpeper;Michael Haugh.
(2014)

232 Citations

Im/Politeness Implicatures

Michael Haugh.
(2014)

231 Citations

Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English

Michael Bevan Haugh;Derek Bousfield.
Journal of Pragmatics (2012)

200 Citations

A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese

Michael Bevan Haugh;Carl Hinze.
Journal of Pragmatics (2003)

195 Citations

Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order

Michael Bevan Haugh.
Journal of Pragmatics (2013)

195 Citations

When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness

Michael Bevan Haugh.
Journal of Politeness Research-language Behaviour Culture (2010)

164 Citations

Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities

Michael Bevan Haugh.
Journal of Pragmatics (2007)

150 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing Michael Haugh

Marc D. Pell

Marc D. Pell

McGill University

Publications: 3

Douglas Walton

Douglas Walton

University of Windsor

Publications: 2

Janet Holmes

Janet Holmes

Victoria University of Wellington

Publications: 2

Karen Tracy

Karen Tracy

University of Colorado Boulder

Publications: 2

Something went wrong. Please try again later.