World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
9243
World Ranking
3159
National Ranking
223

Michael Haugh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Haugh sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 185 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Michael Haugh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Haugh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Haugh is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research broadly spans the fields of Arts and Humanities, Psychology, and Social Sciences, with a notable emphasis on Language and Linguistics as well as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. The subfields closely associated with their work include Literature and Literary Theory, Artificial Intelligence, and Communication.

The scholar's primary research topics cover Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies; Language, Metaphor, and Cognition; and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies. They have also contributed to studies on Swearing, Euphemism, and Multilingualism, Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection, Humor Studies and Applications, and Multilingual Education and Policy.

Michael Haugh has published articles in several recurrent academic venues, such as:

  • Journal of Pragmatics
  • Language & Communication
  • Journal of Politeness Research
  • Lingua
  • International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Michael Haugh are:

  • The pragmatics of initial interactions: Cross-cultural and intercultural perspectives, 2021, Journal of Pragmatics
  • (Online) public denunciation, public incivilities and offence, 2022, Language & Communication

Other notable recent papers in their broader research domain include:

  • The metalinguistics of offence in (British) English, 2020, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
  • Analysing discourse around COVID-19 in the Australian Twittersphere: A real-time corpus-based analysis, 2021, Big Data & Society
  • Jocular flattery in Chinese multi-party instant messaging interactions, 2021, Journal of Pragmatics

Michael Haugh frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Dániel Z. Kádár
  • Wei-Lin Melody Chang
  • Marina Terkourafi
  • Martin Schweinberger
  • Amir Sheikhan

Best Publications

  • The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Understanding Politeness by Dániel Z. Kádár

    Unknown

  • Pragmatics and the English Language

    Jonathan Culpeper;Michael Haugh

  • Im/Politeness Implicatures

    Michael Haugh

  • Jocular mockery, (dis)affiliation, and face

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Mock impoliteness, jocular mockery and jocular abuse in Australian and British English

    Michael Bevan Haugh;Derek Bousfield

  • Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Face in interaction

    Michael Bevan Haugh;Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini

  • The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness

    Jonathan Culpeper;Michael Haugh;Dániel Z. Kádár

  • A metalinguistic approach to deconstructing the concepts of ‘face’ and ‘politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese

    Michael Bevan Haugh;Carl Hinze

  • When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese: Implications for the discursive negotiation of second language learner identities

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • The co-constitution of politeness implicature in conversation

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Intention in pragmatics

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Jocular Mockery as Interactional Practice in Everyday Anglo-Australian Conversation

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • The Cambridge handbook of sociopragmatics

    Michael Haugh;Dániel Z. Kádár;Marina Terkourafi

  • Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates

    Michael Bevan Haugh;Dániel Z. Kádár;Sara Mills

  • Speaker intentions and intentionality

    Michael Bevan Haugh;Kasia M. Jaszczolt

  • Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions

    Michael Haugh

  • Anticipated versus inferred politeness

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Revisiting the conceptualisation of politeness in English and Japanese

    Michael Haugh

  • The importance of "place" in Japanese politeness: Implications for cross-cultural and intercultural analyses

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Epilogue: the first-second order distinction in face and politeness research

    Michael Bevan Haugh

  • Face, communication and social interaction

    Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini;Michael Haugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Dániel Z. Kádár
Dániel Z. Kádár Eötvös Loránd University
Jonathan Culpeper
Jonathan Culpeper Lancaster University
Thomas C. Schmidt
Thomas C. Schmidt Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
Anthony J. Liddicoat
Anthony J. Liddicoat University of Warwick
Neal R. Norrick
Neal R. Norrick Saarland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. Students interested in helping professions can consider masters in social work accelerated programs, which provide a fast track to licensure and impactful careers in social work—ideal for those seeking to make a difference quickly.

Aspiring psychologists can benefit from fast track bachelor degree in psychology options. These programs are designed for students eager to enter the field sooner, offering flexibility and academic rigor for quick completion.

For those drawn to counseling, accredited options like cacrep-accredited online counseling programs ensure quality education and meet key professional standards. Graduates can pursue licensure and diverse roles in community, school, or clinical settings.

Additionally, if you’re focused on family dynamics, an mft degree (Marriage and Family Therapy) prepares you to support families and couples, with online programs making this career path more accessible than ever.

Each of these online degree options aligns well with careers dedicated to human wellbeing, guidance, and societal change.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Haugh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles