World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
33
Citations
4213
World Ranking
7131
National Ranking
507

John Hajek publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hajek sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 278 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John Hajek D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hajek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet

    Carlos Gussenhoven;John Hajek;Madalena Cruz-Ferreira

  • A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials

    Jo-anne Hughson;Robyn Woodward-Kron;Anna Parker;John Hajek

  • Language Planning and the Sociolinguistic Environment in East Timor: Colonial Practice and Changing Language Ecologies

    John Hajek

  • The Rise of Pregnancy Apps and the Implications for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Women: Narrative Review

    Jo-anne Patricia Hughson;J Oliver Daly;Robyn Woodward-Kron;John Hajek

  • Challenging the monolingual mindset

    John Hajek;Yvette Slaughter

  • Tetun Dili: A Grammar of an East Timorese Language

    Catharina Lumien Williams-Van Klinken;John Tony Hajek;Rachel Nordlinger

  • The phonetic status of the labial flap

    Kenneth S. Olson;John Hajek

  • Metalinguistic knowledge: How important is it in studying a language at university?

    Cathie Elder;Jane Warren;John Hajek;Diane Manwaring

  • Building an audio-visual corpus of Australian English: large corpus collection with an economical portable and replicable Black Box

    Denis Burnham;Dominique Estival;Steven Fazio;Jette Viethen

  • Closure duration as an acoustic correlate of the word-initial singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Kelantan Malay

    Mohd Hilmi Hamzah;Janet Fletcher;John Hajek

  • Language contact and functional expansion in Tetun Dili: The evolution of a new press register

    Catharina Williams-van Klinken;John Hajek

  • Enhancing COVID-19 public health communication for culturally and linguistically diverse communities: An Australian interview study with community representatives

    Unknown

  • A Phonological Oddity in the Austronesian Area: Ejectives in Waimoa

    John T Hajek;John Frederick Bowden

  • Language contact and gender in Tetun Dili: What happens when Austronesian meets Romance?

    John Hajek;Catharina Williams-van Klinken

  • Patterns of Address in Dili Tetum, East Timor.

    Catharina Williams-van Klinken;John Hajek

  • Lóvaia: an East Timorese language on the verge of extinction

    John Hajek;Nikolaus Himmelmann;John Bowden

  • Non-durational acoustic correlates of word-initial consonant gemination in Kelantan Malay: The potential roles of amplitude and f0

    Mohd Hilmi Hamzah;John Hajek;Janet Fletcher

  • Patterns of address in Dili Tetum, East Timor

    Unknown

  • Positional effects on the characterization of ejectives in Waima'a

    Unknown

  • Double agent, double cross?Or how a suffix changes nature in an isolating language: dór in Tetun Dili

    J Hajek;C Williams-Van Klinken

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet Fletcher
Janet Fletcher University of Melbourne
Mark Onslow
Mark Onslow University of Technology Sydney
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Canberra
Robert Dale
Robert Dale Macquarie University
Julien Epps
Julien Epps University of New South Wales
Michael Clyne
Michael Clyne University of Melbourne
Joanne Arciuli
Joanne Arciuli Flinders University
Denis K Burnham
Denis K Burnham Western Sydney University
Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University
Catherine T. Best
Catherine T. Best Haskins Laboratories

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John Hajek

Recently Published Articles