World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6684
World Ranking
10642
National Ranking
321

Michael Wagner publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wagner sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Michael Wagner D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wagner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Wagner is affiliated with the University of Canberra in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine with notable contributions in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Language and Linguistics, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's work covers various main topics including Phonetics and Phonology Research, Pediatric Pain Management Techniques, Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation, Linguistic Variation and Morphology, Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Pain Management and Opioid Use, and Anesthesia and Pain Management.

Frequent co-authors of Michael Wagner include:

  • Angelika Berger
  • Vito Giordano
  • Alexandra Luister
  • Eik Vettorazzi
  • Nadine Pointner

Michael Wagner has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Psychological Review
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
  • Scientific Reports
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Recent publications by Michael Wagner include:

  • Two-dimensional parsing of the acoustic stream explains the Iambic-Trochaic Law., 2021, Psychological Review

Other related works in the recent literature connected through co-author collaborations or thematic relevance are:

  • Predictability modulates pronunciation variants through speech planning effects: A case study on coronal stop realizations, 2020, Laboratory Phonology Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology
  • Comparative analysis of artificial intelligence and expert assessments in detecting neonatal procedural pain, 2024, Scientific Reports
  • The iambic-trochaic law without iambs or trochees: Parsing speech for grouping and prominence, 2023, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Help-seeking behavior, treatment barriers and facilitators, attitudes and access to first-line treatment in German adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder, 2025, BMC Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable Text-Speech Alignment Using Kaldi.

    Michael McAuliffe;Michaela Socolof;Sarah Mihuc;Michael Wagner

  • Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review

    Michael Wagner;Duane G. Watson

  • Acoustic Correlates of Information Structure.

    Mara Breen;Evelina G. Fedorenko;Michael Wagner;Edward A. Gibson

  • Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond

    Michael Wagner

  • Prosodylab-aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech

    Kyle Gorman;Jonathan Howell;Michael Wagner

  • Emotion recognition in the wild challenge 2013

    Abhinav Dhall;Roland Goecke;Jyoti Joshi;Michael Wagner

  • Multimodal assistive technologies for depression diagnosis and monitoring

    Jyoti Joshi;Roland Goecke;Roland Goecke;Sharifa Alghowinem;Abhinav Dhall

  • Multimodal Depression Detection: Fusion Analysis of Paralinguistic, Head Pose and Eye Gaze Behaviors

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Julien Epps

  • Eye movement analysis for depression detection

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Gordon Parker

  • Vulnerability of speaker verification to voice mimicking

    Yee Wah Lau;M. Wagner;D. Tran

  • Contrastive topics decomposed

    Michael Wagner

  • Head Pose and Movement Analysis as an Indicator of Depression

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Gordon Parkerx

  • Production planning and coronal stop deletion in spontaneous speech

    James Tanner;Morgan Sonderegger;Michael Wagner

  • Detecting depression: A comparison between spontaneous and read speech

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Julien Epps

  • Spatiotemporal dynamics of audiovisual speech processing.

    Lynne E. Bernstein;Edward T. Auer;Michael Wagner;Curtis W. Ponton

  • PCx: an interior-point code for linear programming

    Joseph Czyzyk;Sanjay Mehrotra;Michael Wagner;Stephen J. Wright

  • Association by movement: evidence from NPI-licensing

    Michael Wagner

  • Anger recognition in speech using acoustic and linguistic cues

    Tim Polzehl;Alexander Schmitt;Florian Metze;Michael Wagner

  • Liveness Verification in Audio-Video Speaker Authentication

    Girija Chetty;Michael Wagner

  • A comparative study of different classifiers for detecting depression from spontaneous speech

    Sharifa Alghowinem;Roland Goecke;Michael Wagner;Julien Epps

  • Fuzzy entropy clustering

    D. Tran;M. Wagner

  • Multi-Level Liveness Verification for Face-Voice Biometric Authentication

    G. Chetty;M. Wagner

Frequent Co-Authors

Roland Goecke
Roland Goecke University of New South Wales
Tuan D. Pham
Tuan D. Pham Queen Mary University of London
Julien Epps
Julien Epps University of New South Wales
Michael Breakspear
Michael Breakspear University of Newcastle Australia
Gordon Parker
Gordon Parker University of New South Wales
Sebastian Möller
Sebastian Möller Technical University of Berlin
Mark Onslow
Mark Onslow University of Technology Sydney
Joanne Arciuli
Joanne Arciuli Flinders University
Denis K Burnham
Denis K Burnham Western Sydney University
Anne Cutler
Anne Cutler Western Sydney University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your educational journey in Computer Science opens the door to several related disciplines and career options. Many students choose to complement or broaden their skills with online degrees that are flexible, affordable, and recognized by employers.

If you want to pursue a technical field with strong industry demand, consider the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering programs. This path provides advanced knowledge for those interested in robotics, manufacturing, or aerospace.

Alternatively, you could start with an online bachelor's degree in physics to build a foundation in analytical thinking and problem solving—skills highly valued in tech.

Data analysis is rapidly growing. Earning data science degrees online can position you for roles in AI, machine learning, and big data, which often overlap with computer science careers.

For those interested in hardware, telecommunications, or automation, there are online electrical engineering courses USA that support specialized and interdisciplinary jobs.

Exploring these online degree options helps future-proof your skills and unlocks diverse career opportunities beyond traditional computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles