World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 48 2345 2165 589 518 123 12978

Louis S. Santiago publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louis S. Santiago between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louis S. Santiago published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2016. 18 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2016. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louis S. Santiago: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 4
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 4
2006 0
2007 5
2008 2
2009 4
2010 9
2011 8
2012 2
2013 6
2014 11
2015 7
2016 17
2017 4
2018 7
2019 11
2020 5
2021 8
2022 4
2023 5
2024 11
2025 7
Total 146
Download as CSV

Louis S. Santiago publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis S. Santiago sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 123 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233 123
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Louis S. Santiago D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis S. Santiago sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131 48
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Botany, Ecology, Photosynthesis, Specific leaf area and Stomatal conductance. The Botany study combines topics in areas such as Hydraulic conductivity, Ecosystem, Agronomy and Horticulture. His study on Xylem is often connected to Population density and Water transport as part of broader study in Horticulture.

His work deals with themes such as Nutrient cycle and Canopy, which intersect with Photosynthesis. His Specific leaf area research incorporates themes from Nutrient and Understory. His studies in Stomatal conductance integrate themes in fields like Soil water, Evapotranspiration and Transpiration.

His most cited work include:

  • Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide (1438 citations)
  • Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees (374 citations)
  • Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees (374 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Ecology, Botany, Agronomy, Photosynthesis and Stomatal conductance. His Ecology research focuses on subjects like Specific leaf area, which are linked to Photosynthetic capacity and Seasonality. His work on Crassulacean acid metabolism, Epiphyte and Evergreen as part of general Botany study is frequently linked to Relative growth rate, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His Agronomy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Canopy, Woody plant, Xylem, Water content and Dry season. In his research on the topic of Photosynthesis, Tropical trees is strongly related with Climate change. His Stomatal conductance research includes themes of Soil water, Deciduous, Horticulture, Water-use efficiency and Transpiration.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (60.87%)
  • Botany (42.75%)
  • Agronomy (47.83%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Ecology (60.87%)
  • Hydraulic conductivity (19.57%)
  • Horticulture (14.49%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Louis S. Santiago mainly focuses on Ecology, Hydraulic conductivity, Horticulture, Agronomy and Xylem. His work on Ecosystem, Competition, Biodiversity and Liana is typically connected to Vegetation as part of general Ecology study, connecting several disciplines of science. In Biodiversity, he works on issues like Araucaria, which are connected to Photosynthetic capacity and Specific leaf area.

Horticulture is closely attributed to Photosynthesis in his study. He focuses mostly in the field of Agronomy, narrowing it down to matters related to δ13C and, in some cases, AMAX, Woody plant and Isotopes of carbon. His work in Xylem tackles topics such as Turgor pressure which are related to areas like Canopy, Resistance, Tropics and Osmotic pressure.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Large hydraulic safety margins protect Neotropical canopy rainforest tree species against hydraulic failure during drought (10 citations)
  • Large hydraulic safety margins protect Neotropical canopy rainforest tree species against hydraulic failure during drought (10 citations)
  • Modeling of xylem vessel occlusion in grapevine. (6 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Ecosystem

Louis S. Santiago mainly investigates Canopy, Xylem, Rainforest, Hydraulic conductivity and Turgor pressure. Louis S. Santiago combines subjects such as Persea, Horticulture, Hass avocado, Photoinhibition and Water quality with his study of Canopy. His Xylem research includes elements of Anatomy and Vitis vinifera.

His Rainforest research incorporates elements of Photosynthetic capacity, Deciduous, Ecosystem, Biome and Specific leaf area. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Agronomy, Resistance, Tropics, Dry season and Liana. Louis S. Santiago connects Turgor pressure with Water transport in his study.

Best Publications

  • Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide

    William K. Cornwell;Johannes H. C. Cornelissen;Kathryn Amatangelo;Ellen Dorrepaal

  • Potassium, phosphorus, or nitrogen limit root allocation, tree growth, or litter production in a lowland tropical forest

    S. Joseph Wright;Joseph B. Yavitt;Nina Wurzburger;Nina Wurzburger;Benjamin L. Turner

  • Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees

    Louis S. Santiago;Louis S. Santiago;Guillermo Goldstein;Frederick C. Meinzer;Jack B. Fisher

  • Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties

    Yusuke Onoda;Mark Westoby;Peter B. Adler;Amy M.F. Choong

  • Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems.

    Todd E. Dawson;Stephen S. O. Burgess;Kevin P. Tu;Rafael S. Oliveira

  • Why are non-photosynthetic tissues generally 13C enriched compared with leaves in C3 plants? Review and synthesis of current hypotheses.

    Lucas A. Cernusak;Guillaume Tcherkez;Claudia Keitel;William K. Cornwell

  • Global effects of soil and climate on leaf photosynthetic traits and rates

    Vincent Maire;Ian J. Wright;I. Colin Prentice;I. Colin Prentice;Niels H. Batjes

  • A review of volatile analytical methods for determining the botanical origin of honey

    Luis F. Cuevas-Glory;Jorge A. Pino;Louis S. Santiago;E. Sauri-Duch

  • Leaf functional traits of tropical forest plants in relation to growth form

    L. S. Santiago;S. J. Wright

  • Tropical tree seedling growth responses to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium addition

    Louis S. Santiago;S. Joseph Wright;Kyle Edward Harms;Kyle Edward Harms;Joseph B. Yavitt

  • Crassulacean acid metabolism and epiphytism linked to adaptive radiations in the Orchidaceae

    Katia Silvera;Louis S. Santiago;John C. Cushman;Klaus Winter

  • Fog interception by Sequoia sempervirens (D. Don) crowns decouples physiology from soil water deficit.

    Kevin A. Simonin;Louis S. Santiago;Todd E. Dawson

  • Stem, root, and older leaf N:P ratios are more responsive indicators of soil nutrient availability than new foliage

    L. A. Schreeg;L. A. Schreeg;L. S. Santiago;L. S. Santiago;S. J. Wright;B. L. Turner

  • Coordination of stem and leaf hydraulic conductance in southern California shrubs: a test of the hydraulic segmentation hypothesis

    Alexandria L. Pivovaroff;Lawren Sack;Louis S. Santiago

  • Water relations of evergreen and drought-deciduous trees along a seasonally dry tropical forest chronosequence

    Niles J. Hasselquist;Michael F. Allen;Louis S. Santiago

  • Coordinated changes in photosynthesis, water relations and leaf nutritional traits of canopy trees along a precipitation gradient in lowland tropical forest

    Louis S. Santiago;Louis S. Santiago;Kaoru Kitajima;S. Joseph Wright;Stephen S. Mulkey

  • Extending the leaf economics spectrum to decomposition: evidence from a tropical forest.

    Louis Stephen Santiago

  • Multiple strategies for drought survival among woody plant species

    Alexandria L. Pivovaroff;Sarah C. Pasquini;Mark E. De Guzman;Karrin P. Alstad

  • Can vessel dimension explain tolerance toward fungal vascular wilt diseases in woody plants? Lessons from Dutch elm disease and esca disease in grapevine

    Jérôme Pouzoulet;Alexandria L. Pivovaroff;Louis S. Santiago;Philippe E. Rolshausen

  • Distribution of crassulacean acid metabolism in orchids of Panama: evidence of selection for weak and strong modes

    Katia Silvera;Louis S Santiago;Klaus Winter

  • Global-scale environmental control of plant photosynthetic capacity.

    Ashehad A. Ali;Ashehad A. Ali;Chonggang Xu;Alistair Rogers;Nathan G. McDowell

  • Transpiration and forest structure in relation to soil waterlogging in a Hawaiian montane cloud forest

    Louis S. Santiago;Guillermo Goldstein;Frederick C. Meinzer;James H. Fownes

  • Coordination and trade-offs among hydraulic safety, efficiency and drought avoidance traits in Amazonian rainforest canopy tree species.

    Louis S. Santiago;Louis S. Santiago;Mark E. De Guzman;Christopher Baraloto;Jacob E. Vogenberg

  • Nutrient cycling and plant-soil feedbacks along a precipitation gradient in lowland Panama

    Louis S. Santiago;Edward A. G. Schuur;Katia Silvera

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter B. Reich
Peter B. Reich University of Minnesota
Guillermo Goldstein
Guillermo Goldstein University of Miami
Todd E. Dawson
Todd E. Dawson University of California, Berkeley
Ian J. Wright
Ian J. Wright Western Sydney University
William K. Cornwell
William K. Cornwell University of New South Wales
Damien Bonal
Damien Bonal University of Lorraine
S. Joseph Wright
S. Joseph Wright Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Michael F. Allen
Michael F. Allen University of California, Riverside
Klaus Winter
Klaus Winter Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Frederick C. Meinzer
Frederick C. Meinzer Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Louis S. Santiago

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles